Literature DB >> 29911967

From Principles to Practice: Real-World Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Breast Cancer Research.

Sarah M Greene1, Susan Brandzel2, Karen J Wernli3.   

Abstract

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) in Washington, DC, has catalyzed a meaningful shift in the composition of research project teams since its initial research funding cycle in 2011. Despite the influx of funding in the research community for patient-centered research, research on how to effectively engage patients and stakeholders in the research process is still relatively nascent. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (KPWHRI) in Seattle, WA, was an early recipient of PCORI research funding and, as of December 2017, has received 8 PCORI research awards totaling nearly $15 million. Anticipating the pivotal importance of PCORI's patient-focused approach, KPWHRI developed a set of 8 principles to guide how research teams should work with patients and other stakeholders to simultaneously achieve research aims and embrace this new paradigm in how research teams collaborate. With a goal of assisting other research teams, this article describes the genesis of the KPWHRI principles, their relevance to patient- and stakeholder-engaged research, and how these principles were brought to life in the context of a specific PCORI-funded project on surveillance imaging in women after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29911967      PMCID: PMC6004970          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/17-232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  14 in total

1.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

2.  Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.

Authors:  John M Westfall; James Mold; Lyle Fagnan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit.

Authors:  Jessica R Ridpath; Cheryl J Wiese; Sarah M Greene
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

4.  Toward patient-centered cancer care: patient perceptions of problematic events, impact, and response.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Douglas W Roblin; Sarah M Greene; Celeste A Lemay; Cassandra L Firneno; Josephine Calvi; Carolyn D Prouty; Kathryn Horner; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; A Donner; I R McWhinney; J Oates; W W Weston; J Jordan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 6.  A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Melissa Fuster; Tully Saunders; Kamal Patel; John B Wong; Laurel K Leslie; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech?

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Paul Wicks; Rafael Alfonso Cristancho; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Patients' and family members' views on patient-centered communication during cancer care.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Reneé L Beard; Gwen L Alexander; Neeraj K Arora; Cassandra Firneno; Bridget Gaglio; Sarah M Greene; Celeste A Lemay; Brandi E Robinson; Douglas W Roblin; Kathleen Walsh; Richard L Street; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A framework for making patient-centered care front and center.

Authors:  Sarah M Greene; Leah Tuzzio; Dan Cherkin
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012

10.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  5 in total

1.  PEARL: A Guide for Developing Community-Engaging and Culturally-Sensitive Education Materials.

Authors:  David Haynes; Kelly D Hughes; Annette Okafor
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2022-10-20

2.  Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders' perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement.

Authors:  Andrea Heckert; Laura P Forsythe; Kristin L Carman; Lori Frank; Rachel Hemphill; Emily A Elstad; Laura Esmail; Julie Kennedy Lesch
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-10-07

3.  Go Slow to Go Fast: Successful Engagement Strategies for Patient-Centered, Multi-Site Research, Involving Academic and Community-Based Organizations.

Authors:  Laura T Pinsoneault; Emily R Connors; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Jerica Broeckling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Utilizing patient advocates in Parkinson's disease: A proposed framework for patient engagement and the modern metrics that can determine its success.

Authors:  Megan Feeney; Christiana Evers; Danielle Agpalo; Lisa Cone; Jori Fleisher; Karlin Schroeder
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Stakeholder Engagement in Adoption, Implementation, and Sustainment of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Increase Mammography Adherence Among Low-Income Women.

Authors:  Jennifer Holcomb; Gayla M Ferguson; Jiali Sun; Gretchen H Walton; Linda Highfield
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.771

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.