| Literature DB >> 29911482 |
Leonardo Lorente1, Sergio T Rodriguez2, Pablo Sanz3, Antonia Pérez-Cejas4, Pedro Abreu-González5, Javier Padilla3, Dácil Díaz6, Antonio González6, María M Martín2, Alejandro Jiménez7, Purificación Cerro8, Manuel A Barrera3.
Abstract
Objective To determine whether there was an association between serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels prior to in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1-year LT mortality. Methods This observational retrospective single-centre study of patients with LT for HCC measured serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde (as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation) before LT. The study endpoint was 1-year LT mortality. Results This study included 142 patients who underwent LT for HCC. Patients who survived the first year ( n = 127) had significantly lower aged liver donors, significantly higher serum TAC levels, and significantly lower serum malondialdehyde levels compared with the non-survivors ( n = 15). Logistic regression analysis found that serum TAC levels (odds ratio [OR] 0.275; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.135, 0.562) and the age of the LT donor (OR 1.050; 95% CI 1.009, 1.094) were associated with 1-year LT mortality. There was an inverse association between serum levels of TAC and malondialdehyde levels (rho = -0.22). Conclusions There was an association between low serum TAC levels prior to LT for HCC and mortality during the first year after LT. There was an inverse association between serum TAC levels and lipid peroxidation as measured by malondialdehyde levels.Entities:
Keywords: Serum total antioxidant capacity; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; mortality; outcome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29911482 PMCID: PMC6124293 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518768150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients (n = 142) with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver transplantation stratified according to their 1-year survival.
| 1-year survivors | 1-year non-survivors | Statistical significance[ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, female | 21 (16.5) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
| Met the Milan criteria prior to LT | 122 (96.1) | 14 (93.3) | NS |
| Met the Milan criteria after LT | 106 (83.5) | 11 (73.3) | NS |
| Degree of tumour differentiation | NS | ||
| Well | 95 (74.8) | 12 (80.0) | |
| Moderate | 29 (22.8) | 2 (13.3) | |
| Poor | 3 (2.4) | 1 (6.7) | |
| Multinodular tumour | 39 (30.7) | 5 (33.3) | NS |
| Portal hypertension | 87 (65.8) | 11 (73.3) | NS |
| Infiltration | 40 (31.5) | 4 (26.7) | NS |
| Macrovascular invasion | 7 (5.5) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
| Microvascular invasion | 27 (21.3) | 3 (20.0) | NS |
| Child-Pugh score | NS | ||
| A | 62 (48.8) | 10 (66.7) | |
| B | 36 (28.3) | 3 (20.0) | |
| C | 29 (22.8) | 2 (13.3) | |
| ABO blood type | NS | ||
| A | 59 (46.5) | 6 (40.0) | |
| B | 11 (8.7) | 2 (13.3) | |
| O | 51 (40.2) | 6 (40.0) | |
| AB | 6 (4.7) | 1 (6.7) | |
| Transplantation technique | NS | ||
| By-pass | 44 (34.6) | 6 (40.0) | |
| Piggy back | 83 (65.4) | 9 (60.0) | |
| Treatment prior to LT | 69 (54.3) | 10 (66.7) | NS |
| Percutaneous ethanol injection | 28 (22.0) | 7 (46.7) | NS |
| Radiofrequency ablation | 8 (6.3) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
| Transarterial chemoembolization | 27 (21.3) | 3 (20.0) | NS |
| Liver resection | 3 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
| Mixed treatment | 3 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
| Age of LT recipient, years | 59 (52–62) | 56 (53–62) | NS |
| Serum alpha-fetoprotein, ng/dl | 7.0 (4.0–42.0) | 12.0 (4.8–164.9) | NS |
| Leukocyte count, 103/mm3 | 4.90 (3.60–6.25) | 4.94 (3.49–7.92) | NS |
| Albumin, g/dl | 3.33 (2.90–4.10) | 3.31 (2.93–4.16) | NS |
| Protein, g/dl | 6.70 (6.10–7.10) | 6.70 (5.70–7.68) | NS |
| MELD score | 15 (12–18) | 15 (15–18) | NS |
| Nodule size, cm | 3.0 (2.0–3.5) | 3.2 (1.7–4.6) | NS |
| Age of liver donor, years | 52 (35–63) | 62 (49–72) | |
| Malondialdehyde, nmol/ml | 2.96 (2.28–4.04) | 3.66 (3.39–4.62) | |
| TAC, nmol/ml | 4.00 (3.40–4.80) | 2.98 (2.26–4.00) |
Data presented as n (%) or median (interquartile range).
Categorical variables were compared using χ2-test; and continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test.
LT, liver transplantation; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; NS, no significant between-group difference (P ≥ 0.05).
Logistic regression analysis of variables associated with 1-year mortality after liver transplantation in patients (n = 142) with hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Variable | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum total antioxidant capacity levels, nmol/ml | 0.275 | 0.135, 0.562 | |
| Age of liver donor, years | 1.050 | 1.009, 1.094 |
Figure 1.Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to estimate the prognostic capacity of serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels for 1-year liver transplantation survival. AUC, area under the curve; IC 95%, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2.Kaplan–Meier 1-year survival analysis of patients with serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) ≥ or < 2.98 nmol/ml. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.