Literature DB >> 29910655

Clinical application and utility of genomic assays in early-stage breast cancer: key lessons learned to date.

S K L Chia1.   

Abstract

Early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is the most common subtype and stage presenting in countries with organized screening programs. Standard clinical and pathologic factors are routinely used to support prognosis and decisions about adjuvant therapies. Hormone receptor and her2 status are essential for decision-making about the use of adjuvant hormonal and anti-her2 therapies respectively. Genomic assays are now commercially available to aid in either further prognostication or in refining the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. The current genomic assays all generally quantify estrogen receptor and proliferation gene sets (among others) by rna expression, although the specific genes assayed are quite discordant. The present review focuses on the pivotal studies in which each assay attempted to demonstrate clinical utility, with an emphasis on prospective trial data for each assay, if available. Using genomic assays, health care providers will increasingly be able to individualize therapy or de-escalate therapy, optimizing clinic benefit while minimizing toxicities from systemic therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; genomic assays

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29910655      PMCID: PMC6001757          DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  24 in total

1.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Margaretha Rudas; Raimund Jakesz; Peter Dubsky; Florian Fitzal; Christian F Singer; Otto Dietze; Richard Greil; Andrea Jelen; Paul Sevelda; Christa Freibauer; Volkmar Müller; Fritz Jänicke; Marcus Schmidt; Heinz Kölbl; Achim Rody; Manfred Kaufmann; Werner Schroth; Hiltrud Brauch; Matthias Schwab; Peter Fritz; Karsten E Weber; Inke S Feder; Guido Hennig; Ralf Kronenwett; Mathias Gehrmann; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Torsten O Nielsen; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Herbert Stöger; Raimund Jakesz; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Otto Dietze; Peter Regitnig; Christine Gruber-Rossipal; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Christian F Singer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Peter Dubsky; Thomas Bauernhofer; Michael Hubalek; Michael Knauer; Harald Trapl; Christian Fesl; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; J Wayne Cowens; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Ten-year outcomes in a population-based cohort of node-negative, lymphatic, and vascular invasion-negative early breast cancers without adjuvant systemic therapies.

Authors:  Stephen K Chia; Caroline H Speers; Cicely J Bryce; Malcolm M Hayes; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Health Care Costs After Introduction of Genomic Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Anil Vachani; Sakhena Hin; Lin Yang; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Katrina Armstrong; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.

Authors:  M Gnant; M Filipits; R Greil; H Stoeger; M Rudas; Z Bago-Horvath; B Mlineritsch; W Kwasny; M Knauer; C Singer; R Jakesz; P Dubsky; F Fitzal; R Bartsch; G Steger; M Balic; S Ressler; J W Cowens; J Storhoff; S Ferree; C Schaper; S Liu; C Fesl; T O Nielsen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Sherene Loi; Laura van't Veer; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse; Arno Floore; Mohamed Amakrane; Fanny Piette; Emiel Rutgers; Christos Sotiriou; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Prognostic utility of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index in early-stage breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial.

Authors:  P-L Jerevall; X-J Ma; H Li; R Salunga; N C Kesty; M G Erlander; D C Sgroi; B Holmlund; L Skoog; T Fornander; B Nordenskjöld; O Stål
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Valentina I Petkov; Dave P Miller; Nadia Howlader; Nathan Gliner; Will Howe; Nicola Schussler; Kathleen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Rosemary Cress; Dennis Deapen; Sally L Glaser; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Lloyd Mueller; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen M Schwartz; Antoinette Stroup; Carol Sweeney; Thomas C Tucker; Kevin C Ward; Charles Wiggins; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lynne Penberthy; Steven Shak
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Discovery of genes positively modulating treatment effect using potential outcome framework and Bayesian update.

Authors:  Young Keun Lee; Jisoo Kim; Sung Wook Seo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 2.  Genomic Assays in Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Maroun Bou Zerdan; Maryam Ibrahim; Clara El Nakib; Rayan Hajjar; Hazem I Assi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Treatment Decisions and Cost in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Quebec.

Authors:  Saima Hassan; Rami Younan; Erica Patocskai; Louise Provencher; Brigitte Poirier; Luca Sideris; Pierre Dubé; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Malorie Chabot-Blanchet; Marie-Claude Guertin; Jean-François Boileau; André Robidoux
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 4.  The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Mariya Yordanova; Saima Hassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.