Literature DB >> 16954471

Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.

Marc Buyse1, Sherene Loi, Laura van't Veer, Giuseppe Viale, Mauro Delorenzi, Annuska M Glas, Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies, Jonas Bergh, Rosette Lidereau, Paul Ellis, Adrian Harris, Jan Bogaerts, Patrick Therasse, Arno Floore, Mohamed Amakrane, Fanny Piette, Emiel Rutgers, Christos Sotiriou, Fatima Cardoso, Martine J Piccart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 70-gene signature was previously shown to have prognostic value in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Our goal was to validate the signature in an independent group of patients.
METHODS: Patients (n = 307, with 137 events after a median follow-up of 13.6 years) from five European centers were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the gene signature classification and on clinical risk classifications. Patients were assigned to the gene signature low-risk group if their 5-year distant metastasis-free survival probability as estimated by the gene signature was greater than 90%. Patients were assigned to the clinicopathologic low-risk group if their 10-year survival probability, as estimated by Adjuvant! software, was greater than 88% (for estrogen receptor [ER]-positive patients) or 92% (for ER-negative patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated to compare time to distant metastases, disease-free survival, and overall survival in high- versus low-risk groups.
RESULTS: The 70-gene signature outperformed the clinicopathologic risk assessment in predicting all endpoints. For time to distant metastases, the gene signature yielded HR = 2.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35 to 4.00) without adjustment for clinical risk and hazard ratios ranging from 2.13 to 2.15 after adjustment for various estimates of clinical risk; clinicopathologic risk using Adjuvant! software yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.68 (95% CI = 0.92 to 3.07). For overall survival, the gene signature yielded an unadjusted HR = 2.79 (95% CI = 1.60 to 4.87) and adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 2.63 to 2.89; clinicopathologic risk yielded an unadjusted HR = 1.67 (95% CI = 0.93 to 2.98). For patients in the gene signature high-risk group, 10-year overall survival was 0.69 for patients in both the low- and high-clinical risk groups; for patients in the gene signature low-risk group, the 10-year survival rates were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The 70-gene signature adds independent prognostic information to clinicopathologic risk assessment for patients with early breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954471     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  342 in total

Review 1.  Role of MTA2 in human cancer.

Authors:  Kyle R Covington; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 2.  Imaging tumour heterogeneity of the consequences of a PKCα-substrate interaction in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gregory Weitsman; Katherine Lawler; Muireann T Kelleher; James E Barrett; Paul R Barber; Eamon Shamil; Frederic Festy; Gargi Patel; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Lufei Huang; Iain D C Tullis; Natalie Woodman; Enyinnaya Ofo; Simon M Ameer-Beg; Sheeba Irshad; John Condeelis; Cheryl E Gillett; Paul A Ellis; Borivoj Vojnovic; Anthony C C Coolen; Tony Ng
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 3.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Libero Santarpia; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Hormonal therapy in breast cancer: a model disease for the personalization of cancer care.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Saveri Bhattacharya; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Gene-expression profiling in breast cancer: bespoke cancer therapy or more fiction than science?

Authors:  M Barry; M R Kell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Microarrays in the clinic.

Authors:  Guy W Tillinghast
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Molecular pathology and patient care.

Authors:  John D Pfeifer
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

9.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Biological resonance for cancer metastasis, a new hypothesis based on comparisons between primary cancers and metastases.

Authors:  Dongwei Gao; Sha Li
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2013-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.