Literature DB >> 24347518

Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone.

M Gnant1, M Filipits, R Greil, H Stoeger, M Rudas, Z Bago-Horvath, B Mlineritsch, W Kwasny, M Knauer, C Singer, R Jakesz, P Dubsky, F Fitzal, R Bartsch, G Steger, M Balic, S Ressler, J W Cowens, J Storhoff, S Ferree, C Schaper, S Liu, C Fesl, T O Nielsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PAM50 is a 50-gene test that is designed to identify intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and generate a Risk of Recurrence (ROR) score. It has been developed to be carried out in qualified routine hospital pathology laboratories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand four hundred seventy-eight postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (EBC) treated with tamoxifen or tamoxifen followed by anastrozole from the prospective randomized ABCSG-8 trial were entered into this study. Patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks and analyzed using the PAM50 test. Both intrinsic subtype (luminal A/B, HER2-enriched, basal-like) and ROR score were calculated. The primary analysis was designed to test whether the continuous ROR score adds prognostic value in predicting distant recurrence (DR) over and above standard clinical variables.
RESULTS: In all tested subgroups, ROR score significantly adds prognostic information to the clinical predictor (P<0.0001). PAM50 assigns an intrinsic subtype to all cases, and the luminal A cohort had a significantly lower ROR at 10 years compared with Luminal B (P<0.0001). Significant and clinically relevant discrimination between low- and high-risk groups occurred also within all tested subgroups. CONCLUSION(S): The results of the primary analysis, in combination with recently published results from the ATAC trial, constitute Level 1 evidence for clinical validity of the PAM50 test for predicting the risk of DR in postmenopausal women with ER+ EBC. A 10-year metastasis risk of <3.5% in the ROR low category makes it unlikely that additional chemotherapy would improve this outcome-this finding could help to avoid unwarranted overtreatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ABCSG 8: NCT00291759.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Risk of Recurrence (ROR); clinical prognostic factors; early breast cancer; intrinsic subtypes; metastasis prediction; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347518     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  117 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular pathology for breast cancer: Importance of the gene expression profile].

Authors:  C Denkert; B M Pfitzner; B I Heppner; M Dietel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Therapy Selection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  E Nilüfer Güler
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-10-01

3.  A Sensitive NanoString-Based Assay to Score STK11 (LKB1) Pathway Disruption in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Brienne E Engel; Eric A Welsh; Sean J Yoder; Stephen G Brantley; Dung-Tsa Chen; Amer A Beg; Chunxia Cao; Frederic J Kaye; Eric B Haura; Matthew B Schabath; W Douglas Cress
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  PAM50 and Risk of Recurrence Scores for Interval Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Samantha Puvanesarajah; Sarah J Nyante; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Mengjie Chen; Chiu-Kit Tse; Xuezheng Sun; Emma H Allott; Erin L Kirk; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Andrew F Olshan; Louise M Henderson; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  How to Achieve Optimal Care in Early Breast Cancer with 'Less' or 'More' Treatment.

Authors:  Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Modern therapeutic concepts of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Gnant
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2014.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Volker Hanf; Florian Schütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Emerging gene-based prognostic tools in early breast cancer: First steps to personalised medicine.

Authors:  Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

10.  Multiparametric Genomic Assays for Breast Cancer: Time for the Next Generation?

Authors:  Adam M Brufsky; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.