Literature DB >> 26598749

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Health Care Costs After Introduction of Genomic Testing in Breast Cancer.

Andrew J Epstein1, Yu-Ning Wong1, Nandita Mitra1, Anil Vachani1, Sakhena Hin1, Lin Yang1, Aaron Smith-McLallen1, Katrina Armstrong1, Peter W Groeneveld2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the associations between the 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS) receipt, subsequent chemotherapy use, and medical expenditures among patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry were used to assemble a retrospective cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer from 2007 to 2010 who underwent initial surgical treatment. These data were merged with administrative claims from the 12-month periods before and after diagnosis to identify comorbidities, treatments, and expenditures (n = 7,287). Propensity score-weighted regression models were estimated to identify the effects of RS receipt on chemotherapy use and medical spending in the year after diagnosis.
RESULTS: The associations between RS receipt and outcomes varied markedly by patient age. RS use was associated with lower chemotherapy use among women younger than 55 (19.2% lower; 95% CI, 10.6 to 27.9). RS use was associated with higher chemotherapy use among women 75 to 84 years old (5.7% higher; 95% CI, 0.4 to 11.0). RS receipt was associated with lower adjusted 1-year medical spending among women younger than 55 ($15,333 lower; 95% CI, $2,841 to $27,824) and with higher spending among women who were 75 to 84 years old ($3,489 higher; 95% CI, $857 to $6,122).
CONCLUSION: RS receipt was associated with reduced use of adjuvant chemotherapy and lower health care spending among women with breast cancer who were younger than 55. Conversely, among women 75 and older, RS testing was associated with a modest increase in chemotherapy use and slightly higher spending. From a population perspective, the impact of RS testing on breast cancer treatment and health care costs is much greater in younger women.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598749      PMCID: PMC5321084          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.9023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?

Authors:  W G Manning; J Mullahy
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Frequency and cost of chemotherapy-related serious adverse effects in a population sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; A James O'Malley; Juliana R Pakes; Joseph P Newhouse; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Daphne T Tsoi; Miho Inoue; Catherine M Kelly; Sunil Verma; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-26

5.  Economic evaluation of genomic test-directed chemotherapy for early-stage lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter S Hall; Christopher McCabe; Robert C Stein; David Cameron
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Management of elderly patients with breast cancer: updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).

Authors:  Laura Biganzoli; Hans Wildiers; Catherine Oakman; Lorenza Marotti; Sibylle Loibl; Ian Kunkler; Malcolm Reed; Stefano Ciatto; Adri C Voogd; Etienne Brain; Bruno Cutuli; Catherine Terret; Margot Gosney; Matti Aapro; Riccardo Audisio
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Dennis Slamon; Wolfgang Eiermann; Nicholas Robert; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Michael Press; John Mackey; John Glaspy; Arlene Chan; Marek Pawlicki; Tamas Pinter; Vicente Valero; Mei-Ching Liu; Guido Sauter; Gunter von Minckwitz; Frances Visco; Valerie Bee; Marc Buyse; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; John Crown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Is the 21-gene recurrence score a cost-effective assay in endocrine-sensitive node-negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Nathan W D Lamond; Chris Skedgel; Tallal Younis
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent a 21-gene expression assay.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Akshara Raghavendra; Arup K Sinha; Masood Pasha Syed; Limin Hsu; Modesto G Patangan; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Yu Shen; Gabriel H Hortobagyi; Vicente Valero; Sharon H Giordano; Naoto T Ueno; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.

Authors:  Young Chandler; Clyde B Schechter; Jinani Jayasekera; Aimee Near; Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Charles E Phelps; G Thomas Ray; Tracy A Lieu; Scott Ramsey; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Clinical application and utility of genomic assays in early-stage breast cancer: key lessons learned to date.

Authors:  S K L Chia
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Oncologist and organizational factors associated with variation in breast cancer multigene testing.

Authors:  Tracy A Lieu; G Thomas Ray; Stephanie R Prausnitz; Laurel A Habel; Stacey Alexeeff; Yan Li; Scott D Ramsey; Charles E Phelps; Neetu Chawla; Suzanne C O'Neill; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Correlation analysis between molecular subtypes and Nottingham Prognostic Index in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hongchao Zhen; Liuting Yang; Li Li; Junxian Yu; Lei Zhao; Yingying Li; Qin Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-27

6.  Characteristics and prognostic values of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women in Beijing with operable breast cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Qin Li; Li Li; Xiaoyue Jiang; Qi Du; Yingrui Li; Teng Li; Hong Gong; Bangwei Cao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

8.  How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Ken Deal; Yvonne Bombard; Natasha Leighl; Karen V MacDonald; Maureen Trudeau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.