Literature DB >> 29908883

Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST.

Ashkan Eliasy1, Kai-Jung Chen2, Riccardo Vinciguerra3, Osama Maklad2, Paolo Vinciguerra4, Renato Ambrósio5, Cynthia J Roberts6, Ahmed Elsheikh7.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the Corvis ST (Oculus; Wetzlar, Germany) biomechanical correction algorithm (bIOP) in determining intraocular pressure (IOP) using experiments on ex-vivo human eyes. Five ex-vivo human ocular globes (age 69 ± 3 years) were obtained and tested within 3-5 days post mortem. Using a custom-built inflation rig, the internal pressure of the eyes was controlled mechanically and measured using the CorVis ST (CVS-IOP). The CVS-IOP measurements were then corrected to produce bIOP, which was developed for being less affected by variations in corneal biomechanical parameters, including tissue thickness and material properties. True IOP (IOPt) was defined as the pressure inside of the globe as monitored using a fixed pressure transducer. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the accuracy of both CVS-IOP and bIOP, and their correlation with corneal thickness. While no significant differences were found between bIOP and IOPt (0.3 ± 1.6 mmHg, P = 0.989) using ANOVA and Bonferroni Post-Hoc test, the differences between CVS-IOP and IOPt were significant (7.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, P < 0.001). Similarly, bIOP exhibited no significant correlation with central corneal thickness (p = 0.756), whereas CVS-IOP was significantly correlated with the thickness (p < 0.001). The bIOP correction has been successful in providing close estimates of true IOP in ex-vivo tests conducted on human donor eye globes, and in reducing association with the cornea's thickness.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal biomechanics; Intraocular pressure; Tonometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29908883     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  17 in total

1.  Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Authors:  Kaiwei Cao; Lina Liu; Ting Yu; Feng Chen; Ji Bai; Ting Liu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Changes in Intraocular Pressure after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Chien-Chih Chou; Po-Jen Shih; Hung-Chou Lin; Jun-Peng Chen; Jia-Yush Yen; I-Jong Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; AbbasAli Yekta; Ahmed Elsheikh; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Renato Ambrósio; Nasim Maddah; Zeynab Danesh
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2019-10-17

4.  Corneal pulsation and biomechanics during induced ocular pulse. An ex-vivo pilot study.

Authors:  Maja M Rogala; Daniel Lewandowski; Jerzy Detyna; Agnieszka Antończyk; Monika E Danielewska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.

Authors:  Lisa Ramm; Robert Herber; Eberhard Spoerl; Frederik Raiskup; Lutz E Pillunat; Naim Terai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Salwah Rehman; Neeru A Vallabh; Mark Batterbury; Gabriela Czanner; Anshoo Choudhary; Robert Cheeseman; Ahmed Elsheikh; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.

Authors:  Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Marcella Q Salomão; Bernardo T Lopes; Paolo Vinciguerra; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Cynthia Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh; Daniel G Dawson; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  Simulation of Air Puff Tonometry Test Using Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) Deforming Mesh for Corneal Material Characterisation.

Authors:  Osama Maklad; Ashkan Eliasy; Kai-Jung Chen; Vassilios Theofilis; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Age distribution and associated factors of cornea biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in Chinese healthy population.

Authors:  Guihua Liu; Hua Rong; Ruxia Pei; Bei Du; Nan Jin; Di Wang; Chengcheng Jin; Ruihua Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Effect of biomechanical properties on myopia: a study of new corneal biomechanical parameters.

Authors:  Fang Han; Mengdi Li; Pinghui Wei; Jiaonan Ma; Vishal Jhanji; Yan Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.