Literature DB >> 31463819

Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Kaiwei Cao1, Lina Liu1, Ting Yu1, Feng Chen1, Ji Bai2, Ting Liu3.   

Abstract

Observe the influence of femtosecond laser cutting on corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and assess the biomechanical changes following the operation. Prospective, non-randomized study. A total of 80 eyes from 80 patients were treated with either SMILE or FS-LASIK. Parameters of inverse concave radius, deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm or 1 mm (DA ratio 2 mm or 1 mm), highest concavity radius (HC radius), biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by Corvis ST II were recorded at 1 day preoperatively, immediately after the lenticule or flap creation, during subsequent lenticule extraction or excimer laser ablation, and during follow-up at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. After lenticule creation, the DA ratio 2 mm or 1 mm was bigger (p < 0.05), meanwhile, CCT was thicker (p < 0.05) than with flap creation. Partial parameters changed significantly after lenticule creation or flap creation, and all parameters changed significantly after tissue removal. All parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05) after operation. The variations in bIOP (ΔbIOP) after operation were significantly less than those in Δnon-contact IOP (p < 0.001) in two groups. Femtosecond laser cutting during lenticule creation has a greater impact on corneal biomechanics than flap creation. Both the femtosecond laser cutting and removal of tissue degrade corneal biomechanics; however, these effects may be predominantly a result of tissue removal. SMILE and FS-LASIK have no differences in corneal biomechanics when the same CCT is consumed. bIOP is more reliable after the operation, but further study is essential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal biomechanics; Corvis ST II; FS-LASIK; Femtosecond laser cutting; SMILE; bIOP

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463819     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02854-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  37 in total

1.  Bilateral keratectasia after unilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: a retrospective diagnosis of ectatic corneal disorder.

Authors:  Jim C Wang; Thierry J Hufnagel; Douglas F Buxton
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Thin-flap femtosecond LASIK.

Authors:  Scott MacRae
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Biomechanical customization: the next generation of laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Cynthia Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation.

Authors:  Aylin Kılıç Uzbek; Günhal Kamburoğlu; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.424

5.  Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx): clinical results, interface evaluation, and intraocular pressure variation.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Shyam S Chaurasia; Romesh I Angunawela; Rebekah Poh; Andri Riau; Donald Tan; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST.

Authors:  Ashkan Eliasy; Kai-Jung Chen; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Osama Maklad; Paolo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Cynthia J Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Cohesive tensile strength of human LASIK wounds with histologic, ultrastructural, and clinical correlations.

Authors:  Ingo Schmack; Daniel G Dawson; Bernard E McCarey; George O Waring; Hans E Grossniklaus; Henry F Edelhauser
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Changes in corneal deformation parameters after lenticule creation and extraction during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Jing Zhao; Peijun Yao; Huamao Miao; Lingling Niu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Digital analysis of flap parameter accuracy and objective assessment of opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a novel technique.

Authors:  A John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-15

10.  Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Ihab Mohamed Osman; Hany Ahmed Helaly; Moones Abdalla; Mohsen Abou Shousha
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  7 in total

1.  Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Lei Tian; Haixia Zhang; Yan Zheng; Caiyun Fu; Changbin Zhai; Ying Jie; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 2.  Decade - long journey with small incision lenticule extraction: The learnings.

Authors:  Gitansha S Sachdev; Shreyas Ramamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Commentary: Corneal biomechanical assessment following refractive surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran G Lalgudi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Time-varying regularity of changes in biomechanical properties of the corneas after removal of anterior corneal tissue.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Xiao Qin; Haixia Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea.

Authors:  Yue Xin; Bernardo T Lopes; JunJie Wang; Jie Wu; ManMan Zhu; MuChen Jiang; YuanYuan Miao; HuiNi Lin; Si Cao; XiaoBo Zheng; Ashkan Eliasy; ShiHao Chen; QinMei Wang; YuFeng Ye; FangJun Bao; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients.

Authors:  Shengyu He; Yiqi Luo; Yiming Ye; Pei Chen; Chang Liu; Lei Lei; Jing Zhuang; Keming Yu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

7.  Corneal morphological changes after small incision lenticule extraction for myopic anisometropia.

Authors:  Lu Zhu; Yan Ji; Xin Yang; Xiaorong Lu; Qiong Wu; Qing Wang; Jiuyi Xia; Meng Li; Ke Hu; Wenjuan Wan
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.