Kim Pulvers1, Cliff Ridenour2, Anna Woodcock2, Micah J Savin2, Gabriel Holguin2, Sharon Hamill2, Devan R Romero3. 1. Department of Psychology, California State University San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd., San Marcos, CA 92096, United States. Electronic address: kpulvers@csusm.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, California State University San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd., San Marcos, CA 92096, United States. 3. Department of Kinesiology, California State University San Marcos, 333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd., San Marcos, CA 92096, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a peak time for uptake of both tobacco and marijuana (dual use). This study aimed to identify clusters of lifetime tobacco and marijuana use patterns and associated risk factors, and to determine whether dual tobacco and marijuana use is uniquely associated with greater risk than use of either tobacco or marijuana alone. METHOD: High school students participated in a survey during Fall 2014 (N = 976; 68% Hispanic; 57% parental education < high school). Items from national youth surveys were used to measure lifetime and current use of tobacco products, marijuana, alcohol, drug use, and other risk behaviors, and literature-based surveys were used to measure psychological constructs. RESULTS: Latent Class Analysis identified three clusters of lifetime tobacco use patterns (no tobacco, one or two products, and more than two products), each with a correspondingly distinct profile of risk behaviors; risk escalated with use of more tobacco products. Multinomial modeling characterized personal, environmental, and behavioral correlates of dual lifetime tobacco and marijuana use, including lower parental monitoring, lower grades, higher guilt, higher lifetime alcohol and drug use, and more substance use by friends, in reference to single lifetime use of either tobacco or marijuana. CONCLUSION: Broader use of tobacco (i.e., more products) was associated with numerous risk factors. Dual lifetime use of tobacco and marijuana was associated with numerous risks compared to single use of either tobacco or marijuana. Longitudinal work is needed to understand temporal relationships between risk variables to determine optimal timing for interventions to reduce harmful behaviors.
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a peak time for uptake of both tobacco and marijuana (dual use). This study aimed to identify clusters of lifetime tobacco and marijuana use patterns and associated risk factors, and to determine whether dual tobacco and marijuana use is uniquely associated with greater risk than use of either tobacco or marijuana alone. METHOD: High school students participated in a survey during Fall 2014 (N = 976; 68% Hispanic; 57% parental education < high school). Items from national youth surveys were used to measure lifetime and current use of tobacco products, marijuana, alcohol, drug use, and other risk behaviors, and literature-based surveys were used to measure psychological constructs. RESULTS: Latent Class Analysis identified three clusters of lifetime tobacco use patterns (no tobacco, one or two products, and more than two products), each with a correspondingly distinct profile of risk behaviors; risk escalated with use of more tobacco products. Multinomial modeling characterized personal, environmental, and behavioral correlates of dual lifetime tobacco and marijuana use, including lower parental monitoring, lower grades, higher guilt, higher lifetime alcohol and drug use, and more substance use by friends, in reference to single lifetime use of either tobacco or marijuana. CONCLUSION: Broader use of tobacco (i.e., more products) was associated with numerous risk factors. Dual lifetime use of tobacco and marijuana was associated with numerous risks compared to single use of either tobacco or marijuana. Longitudinal work is needed to understand temporal relationships between risk variables to determine optimal timing for interventions to reduce harmful behaviors.
Authors: Linda J Neff; René A Arrazola; Ralph S Caraballo; Catherine G Corey; Shanna Cox; Brian A King; Conrad J Choiniere; Corinne G Husten Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Danielle E Ramo; Kevin L Delucchi; Sharon M Hall; Howard Liu; Judith J Prochaska Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Paul T Harrell; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Andrew D Plunk; Ming Ji; Silvia S Martins Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: William S John; He Zhu; Paolo Mannelli; Geetha A Subramaniam; Robert P Schwartz; Jennifer McNeely; Li-Tzy Wu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Anthony Rodriguez; Michael S Dunbar; Eric R Pedersen; Jordan P Davis; Regina A Shih; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Albert J Ksinan; Tory R Spindle; Nathaniel S Thomas; Thomas Eissenberg; Danielle M Dick Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Katelyn F Romm; Nicholas J Felicione; Geri Dino; Melissa D Blank; Nicholas A Turiano Journal: Pers Individ Dif Date: 2020-05-12
Authors: Natacha M De Genna; Lidush Goldschmidt; Gale A Richardson; Marie D Cornelius; Nancy L Day Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Rachel Herold; Rachel Boykan; Allison Eliscu; Héctor E Alcalá; Maciej L Goniewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390