Kai Wang1, Xiaolu Jin2, Qiangqiang Li1, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya3, Richard K Le Leu4, Michael A Conlon5, Liming Wu1, Fuliang Hu6. 1. Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. 3. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, 13083-970, Brazil. 4. Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 5. CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 6. College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Abstract
SCOPE: Dietary supplementation with polyphenol-rich propolis can protect against experimentally induced colitis. We examined whether different polyphenol compositions of Chinese propolis (CP) and Brazilian propolis (BP) influence their ability to protect against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: HPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS analysis confirmed that polyphenol compositions of CP and BP were dissimilar. Rats were given CP or BP by gavage (300 mg kg-1 body weight) throughout the study, starting 1 week prior to DSS treatment for 1 week followed by 3 d without DSS. CP and BP significantly reduced the colitis disease activity index relative to controls not receiving propolis, prevented significant DSS-induced colonic tissue damage, and increased resistance to DSS-induced colonic oxidative stress as shown by reduced malonaldehyde levels and increased T-AOC levels. CP and BP significantly reduced DSS-induced colonic apoptosis. Colonic inflammatory markers IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1 were suppressed by CP and BP, whereas only BP-induced expression of TGF-β. CP, not BP, increased the diversity and richness of gut microbiota populations. Both forms of propolis significantly reduced populations of Bacteroides spp. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the dissimilar polyphenol compositions of CP and BP, their ability to protect against DSS-induced colitis is similar. Nevertheless, some different physiological impacts were observed.
SCOPE: Dietary supplementation with polyphenol-rich propolis can protect against experimentally induced colitis. We examined whether different polyphenol compositions of Chinese propolis (CP) and Brazilian propolis (BP) influence their ability to protect against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: HPLC-DAD/Q-TOF-MS analysis confirmed that polyphenol compositions of CP and BP were dissimilar. Rats were given CP or BP by gavage (300 mg kg-1 body weight) throughout the study, starting 1 week prior to DSS treatment for 1 week followed by 3 d without DSS. CP and BP significantly reduced the colitis disease activity index relative to controls not receiving propolis, prevented significant DSS-induced colonic tissue damage, and increased resistance to DSS-induced colonic oxidative stress as shown by reduced malonaldehyde levels and increased T-AOC levels. CP and BP significantly reduced DSS-induced colonic apoptosis. Colonic inflammatory markers IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP-1 were suppressed by CP and BP, whereas only BP-induced expression of TGF-β. CP, not BP, increased the diversity and richness of gut microbiota populations. Both forms of propolis significantly reduced populations of Bacteroides spp. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the dissimilar polyphenol compositions of CP and BP, their ability to protect against DSS-induced colitis is similar. Nevertheless, some different physiological impacts were observed.
Authors: Katrina Paz D Calimag; Czarina Catherine H Arbis; Therese Marie A Collantes; Jussiaea V Bariuan; Mary Jasmin C Ang; Cleofas A Cervancia; Mark Joseph M Desamero; Maria Amelita C Estacio Journal: Exp Anim Date: 2020-11-25