| Literature DB >> 35812872 |
Kelang Kang1,2, Nanxuan Zhou1,2, Weishi Peng1,2, Fang Peng1,2, Mengmeng Ma1,2, Liwei Li1,2, Fuyi Fu1,2, Shuhan Xiang1,2, Haihan Zhang1,2,3, Xi He1,2,3,4, Zehe Song1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Wooden breast (WB) is a widely prevalent myopathy in broiler chickens. However, the role of the gut microbiota in this myopathy remains largely unknown, in particular the regulatory effect of gut microbiota in the modulation of muscle metabolism. Totally, 300 1-day-old Arbor Acres broilers were raised until 49 days and euthanized, and the breast filets were classified as normal (NORM), mild (MILD), or severe wooden breast (SEV). Birds with WB comprised 27.02% of the individuals. Severe WB filets had a greater L* value, a* value, and dripping loss but a lower pH (P < 0.05). WB filets had abundant myofiber fragmentation, with a lower average myofiber caliber and more fibers with a diameter of <20 μm (P < 0.05). The diversity of the intestinal microflora was decreased in birds with severe WB, with decreases in Chao 1, and observed species indices. At the phylum level, birds with severe WB had a lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio (P = 0.098) and a decreased abundance of Verrucomicrobia (P < 0.05). At the species level, gut microbiota were positively correlated with 131 digesta metabolites in pathways of glutamine and glutamate metabolism and arginine biosynthesis but were negatively correlated with 30 metabolites in the pathway of tyrosine metabolism. In plasma, WB induced five differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs), including anserine and choline, which were related to the severity of the WB lesion. The microbial-derived metabolites, including guanidoacetic acid, antiarol, and (2E)-decenoyl-ACP, which entered into plasma were related to meat quality traits and myofiber traits. In summary, WB filets differed in gut microbiota, digesta, and plasma metabolites. Gut microbiota respond to the wooden breast myopathy by driving dynamic changes in digesta metabolites that eventually enter the plasma.Entities:
Keywords: broilers; gut microbiome; meat quality; metabolomics; plasma metabolomics; wooden breast myopathy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35812872 PMCID: PMC9260154 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.922516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Appearance, incidence, and meat quality of WB. (A) Appearance of normal, mild, and severe WB filets. (B) Body weight of birds with or without WB. (C) Incidence of WB. (D) Meat quality of WB filets, L value, lightness, a* value, redness, b* value, and yellowness. “*” means P-value < 0.05; “**” means P-value < 0.01.
Effect of wooden breast severity on antioxidant traits in pectoralis major filets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| T-AOC, U/mgprot | 0.511 | 0.477 | 0.668 | 0.034 | 0.120 |
| T-SOD, U/mgprot | 140.0 | 178.5 | 290.2 | 16.7 | <0.001 |
| CAT, U/mgprot | 12.5 | 18.0 | 21.9 | 1.44 | 0.006 |
| GSH-PX, μM/mgprot | 130.7 | 133.4 | 177.7 | 9.61 | 0.092 |
| GSH, μg/mgprot | 40.8 | 50.0 | 67.5 | 3.06 | 0.001 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/mgprot | 10.19 | 11.66 | 10.54 | 0.31 | 0.130 |
| MDA, nM/mgprot | 2.06 | 2.63 | 3.33 | 0.11 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||
| T-AOC, U/ml | 7.61 | 5.91 | 4.28 | 0.452 | 0.013 |
| T-SOD, U/ml | 129.9 | 148.4 | 160.3 | 4.8 | 0.029 |
| CAT, U/ml | 12.87 | 12.06 | 12.19 | 0.32 | 0.548 |
| GSH-PX, μM/L | 707.8 | 693.7 | 515.8 | 27.5 | 0.007 |
| GSH, μg/ml | 146.4 | 142.2 | 142.3 | 1.82 | 0.591 |
| 8-OHdG, ng/ml | 16.41 | 18.95 | 21.93 | 1.13 | 0.138 |
| MDA, nM/L | 3.25 | 3.52 | 2.54 | 0.21 | 0.159 |
Values within a row without a common letter are significantly different (P < 0.05), Duncan test.
NORM, normal filets; MILD, mild wooden breast filets; SEV, severe wooden breast filets, n = 60.
Figure 2Histopathologic studies and myofiber parameters in WB filets. (A) Breast filet muscle tissue sections were stained with H&E and examined under a microscope. Left, normal filets; middle, mild WB; right, severe WB. (B) Histogram of muscle fiber diameters. (C) Muscle fiber characteristic. “***” means P-value < 0.001; “****” means P-value < 0.0001.
Figure 3Composition and diversity of cecal microbiota in birds with WB. (A) Alpha diversity index analysis. (B) PCoA of composition of gut microbiota between birds with or without WB. (C) Composition of gut microbiota at the phylum level. (D) Difference in the relative abundance of microbes between birds with or without WB in the phylum level. (E) Heat map of microbiota on the abundance of top 25 between birds with or without WB in the species level. (F) Details of WB altered bacteria in the species level. “*” means P-value < 0.05; “**” means P-value < 0.01.
Figure 4Results of digesta metabolomics. (A) sPLS-DA analysis of positive ions. (B) sPLS-DA analysis of negative ions. (C) GO pathway annotation in digesta metabolites. (D) Correlation between bacteria and digesta metabolites; red points, positively correlated; blue, negatively correlated; gray, not significantly correlated. (E) Numbers of digesta metabolites correlated with microbiota. (F) GO pathway annotation for bacteria-related metabolites. (G) Correlation between altered bacteria and differential metabolites in digesta.
Figure 5Results of plasma metabolomics and correlation analysis with digesta metabolomics. (A) sPLS-DA analysis of positive ions. (B) sPLS-DA analysis of negative ions. (C) Bar graphs for the number of differential expressed metabolites. (D) GO pathway annotation for differential expressed metabolites between normal and mild WB; between severe and mild WB. (E) Coordinate plot for log2 (fold change value) for metabolites between mild WB and normal in X-axis; for metabolites between severe and mild WB in Y-axis. (F) Details of intensity of WB-inducing DEMs in plasma. (G) Venn diagram of metabolites between bacteria correlated DEMs in digesta and WB-inducing or -suppressing DEMs in plasma. (H) Correlation of bacteria correlated DEMs with WB characteristics of antioxidant properties, meat quality, and myofiber characteristics. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;***P < 0.001. ns, not significant.