Christopher W Ives1, Wael A AlJaroudi2, Vineeta Kumar3, Ayman Farag4, Dana V Rizk3, Suzanne Oparil4, Ami E Iskandrian4, Fadi G Hage5,6. 1. University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Clemenceau Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. 3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. 5. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 701 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. fadihage@uab.edu. 6. Section of Cardiology, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. fadihage@uab.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Noninvasive stress testing is commonly performed as part of pre-renal transplantation (RT) evaluation. We evaluated the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-myocardial perfusion, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart rate response (HRR)-post-RT. METHODS: Consecutive RT recipients were identified at our institution. MPI was considered abnormal when there was a perfusion defect or reduced ejection fraction. HRR to vasodilator stress was calculated as percentage change from baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) post-RT; all-cause mortality was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Among 1189 RT recipients, 819 (69%) underwent MPI. Of those, 182 (22%) had abnormal MPI, and 31 (4%) underwent CR pre-RT. During a median follow-up of 56 months post-RT, the annual CV event and mortality rates for patients who had no MPI, normal MPI and abnormal MPI were 1.5%, 3.1% and 4.3% (p < 0.001), and 1.8%, 2.6% and 3.6% (p = 0.016), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, compared to patients without MPI, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CV events for normal and abnormal MPI were 1.47 ([0.93-2.33], p = 0.1) and 1.78 ([1.03-3.06], p = 0.04). Blunted HRR was an independent predictor of CV events (HR = 1.73 [1.04-2.86], p = 0.034) and all-cause death (HR = 2.26 [1.28-3.98], p = 0.005) after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR pre-RT had annual mortality rates similar to those with no or normal MPI (1.9% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.2), while those who did not undergo CR had higher annual mortality (4% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: One in five RT recipients who underwent screening MPI had an abnormal study, an independent predictor of CV events. A blunted HRR to vasodilator stress was associated with increased risk of CV events and death, even after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR were at low risk of mortality following RT. MPI is a useful tool to aid in risk stratification pre-RT.
PURPOSE: Noninvasive stress testing is commonly performed as part of pre-renal transplantation (RT) evaluation. We evaluated the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-myocardial perfusion, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart rate response (HRR)-post-RT. METHODS: Consecutive RT recipients were identified at our institution. MPI was considered abnormal when there was a perfusion defect or reduced ejection fraction. HRR to vasodilator stress was calculated as percentage change from baseline. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary revascularization (CR) post-RT; all-cause mortality was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Among 1189 RT recipients, 819 (69%) underwent MPI. Of those, 182 (22%) had abnormal MPI, and 31 (4%) underwent CR pre-RT. During a median follow-up of 56 months post-RT, the annual CV event and mortality rates for patients who had no MPI, normal MPI and abnormal MPI were 1.5%, 3.1% and 4.3% (p < 0.001), and 1.8%, 2.6% and 3.6% (p = 0.016), respectively. After multivariate adjustment, compared to patients without MPI, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CV events for normal and abnormal MPI were 1.47 ([0.93-2.33], p = 0.1) and 1.78 ([1.03-3.06], p = 0.04). Blunted HRR was an independent predictor of CV events (HR = 1.73 [1.04-2.86], p = 0.034) and all-cause death (HR = 2.26 [1.28-3.98], p = 0.005) after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR pre-RT had annual mortality rates similar to those with no or normal MPI (1.9% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.2), while those who did not undergo CR had higher annual mortality (4% vs. 1.7-2.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: One in five RT recipients who underwent screening MPI had an abnormal study, an independent predictor of CV events. A blunted HRR to vasodilator stress was associated with increased risk of CV events and death, even after adjusting for abnormal MPI. Patients with abnormal MPI who underwent CR were at low risk of mortality following RT. MPI is a useful tool to aid in risk stratification pre-RT.
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Hugo A Katus; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; Sean W Hayes; James Min; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Fahad M Iqbal; Wael Al Jaroudi; Kumar Sanam; Aaron Sweeney; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 2.778