Literature DB >> 25677160

The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.

Fadi G Hage1,2, Gopal Ghimire3, Davis Lester4, Joshua Mckay3, Steven Bleich3, Stephanie El-Hajj5, Ami E Iskandrian3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regadenoson (REGA), a selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist, is the most widely used stress agent for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the United States. The diagnostic accuracy of REGA MPI is comparable to Adenosine MPI, but its prognostic value is not well defined.
METHODS: We categorized 1,400 patients (700 consecutive normal and 700 consecutive abnormal REGA-MPIs) into 4 groups based on the perfusion defect size using automated quantitative analysis: Group 1: normal perfusion; Group 2: <10% of left ventricle; Group 3: 10%-20%; Group 4: >20%. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and late coronary revascularization (CR >90 days after MPI).
RESULTS: Of the 1,400 patients (42% male, 37% diabetes, 21% heart failure, 26% end-stage renal disease), the primary outcome occurred in 23% (17% cardiac death, 4% MI, 6% late CR) during 46 ± 18 months of follow-up and 8% had early CR (within 90 days of MPI). Early CR occurred in 0.4%, 9%, 17%, and 17% and the primary outcome in 10%, 27%, 31%, and 43% in Groups 1-4, respectively (P < .001 for both). In an adjusted Cox proportional model, the hazard ratio for the primary outcome was 2.68 (1.77-4.06), 3.32 (2.28-4.83), and 4.05 (2.78-5.91) for Groups 2-4 compared to Group 1.
CONCLUSION: REGA MPI provides powerful prognostic information that has important implications in patient management and can guide clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial perfusion imaging; prognosis; quantitative analysis; regadenoson

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25677160      PMCID: PMC4537401          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-014-0050-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  26 in total

1.  Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans.

Authors:  Hsiao D Lieu; John C Shryock; Gregory O von Mering; Toufigh Gordi; Brent Blackburn; Ann W Olmsted; Luiz Belardinelli; Richard A Kerensky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Benjamin C Lee; James N Kritzman; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  G Germano; H Kiat; P B Kavanagh; M Moriel; M Mazzanti; H T Su; K F Van Train; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  A prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Prognostic value of adenosine single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium imaging in medically treated patients with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A M Kamal; A A Fattah; S Pancholy; S Aksut; V Cave; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Patricia Nguyen; Peter Staehr; S Richard Underwood; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

9.  Prognostic value of dipyridamole thallium scintigraphy for evaluation of ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  R C Hendel; J J Layden; J A Leppo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Incremental prognostic value of adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A M Amanullah; D S Berman; J Erel; H Kiat; I Cohen; G Germano; J D Friedman; R Hachamovitch
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  37 in total

1.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Davis Lester; Stephanie El-Hajj; Ayman A Farag; Pradeep Bhambhvani; Lindsey Tauxe; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Cardiovascular risk assessment with regadenoson SPECT MPI in patients with end-stage renal disease is safe, effective, and well tolerated: Does it matter?

Authors:  Erica O Miller; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Vasodilator stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Rayan Saab; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Safety of stress testing in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers: Are all modalities created equal?

Authors:  Rami Doukky; Yasmeen Golzar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Ahmed Fathala; Mohammed Alqattan; Riyadh Alsalloum
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher W Ives; Wael A AlJaroudi; Vineeta Kumar; Ayman Farag; Dana V Rizk; Suzanne Oparil; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Immortality time and serial myocardial perfusion imaging: Only those who do not die may repeat the exam.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  The prognostic value of regadenoson stress: Has the case been made?

Authors:  Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Effect of changes in perfusion defect size during serial regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Stephanie El-Hajj; Wael A AlJaroudi; Ayman Farag; Steven Bleich; Padma Manaoragada; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.