Literature DB >> 19332209

Differences in heart rate response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Fadi G Hage1, Jaekyeong Heo, Billy Franks, Luiz Belardinelli, Brent Blackburn, Whedy Wang, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenosine and regadenoson increase heart rate (HR) when used as stress agents to produce coronary hyperemia due to direct sympathetic stimulation. We hypothesized that the HR response will be lower in patients with than in those without diabetes mellitus (DM).
METHODS: We studied the HR response (percentage maximal increase) in 2,000 patients in The ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (ADVANCE MPI 1 and 2) Trials with known DM status.
RESULTS: There were 643 patients with a history of DM (65.4 +/- 0.4 years, 32% women) and 1,357 patients with no DM (65.5 +/- 0.3 years, 29% women). Compared with non-DM, the DM group had higher HR at baseline (68.4 +/- 0.48 vs 65.2 +/- 0.31 beat/min, P < .001) and smaller HR response after adenosine or regadenoson administration (29.4% +/- 0.64% vs 36.1% +/- 0.54%, P < .001). Insulin therapy was associated with further blunting in the HR response (25.9% +/- 1.0% vs 31.2% +/- 0.8%, P < .001). After adjusting for beta-blocker intake, baseline HR, age, gender, renal function, systolic blood pressure, and left ventricular systolic function, DM independently accounted for a decrease in the HR response.
CONCLUSIONS: The HR response to adenosine and regadenoson in patients with DM is blunted. If additional studies confer an agreement between traditional tests for determination of autonomic neuropathy and this measure, then examination of HR response to these agents during myocardial perfusion imaging might add prognostic power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332209     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  32 in total

Review 1.  Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Gilbert J Zoghbi; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Heart rate response during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher W Ives; Wael A AlJaroudi; Vineeta Kumar; Ayman Farag; Dana V Rizk; Suzanne Oparil; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Indirect evidence of sympathetic stimulation by regadenoson.

Authors:  G Ross Farris; Fadi G Hage; Vineet Kumar; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Punitha Arasaratnam; Masoud Sadreddini; Yeung Yam; Vinay Kansal; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Rob S Beanlands; Michael E Merhige; Brent A Williams; Emir Veledar; James K Min; Li Chen; Terrence D Ruddy; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prognostic value of heart rate response during regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Tania Campagnoli; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Marwan Wassouf; Amjad Ali; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging: Is it safe?

Authors:  Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Heart rate reserve during pharmacological stress is a significant negative predictor of impaired coronary flow reserve in women.

Authors:  Ahmed Haider; Susan Bengs; Monika Maredziak; Michael Messerli; Michael Fiechter; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Valerie Treyer; Moritz Schwyzer; Christel Hermann Kamani; Dimitri Patriki; Elia von Felten; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.