Literature DB >> 23111139

Reclassification of cardiovascular risk in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging using heart rate response to vasodilator stress.

Fahad M Iqbal1, Wael Al Jaroudi, Kumar Sanam, Aaron Sweeney, Jaekyeong Heo, Ami E Iskandrian, Fadi G Hage.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that patients with normal vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) findings remain at a greater risk of future cardiac events than patients with normal exercise MPI findings. The aim was to assess improvement in risk classification provided by the heart rate response (HRR) in patients with normal vasodilator MPI findings when added to traditional risk stratification. We retrospectively studied 2,000 patients with normal regadenoson or adenosine MPI findings. Risk stratification was performed using Adult Treatment Panel III framework. Patients were stratified by HRR (percentage of increase from baseline) into tertiles specific to each vasodilator. All-cause mortality and cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) ≤2 years from the index MPI were recorded. During follow-up, 11.8% patients died and 2.7% patients experienced cardiac death/nonfatal MI in the adenosine and regadenoson groups, respectively. The patients who died had a greater Framingham risk score (12 ± 4 vs 11 ± 4, p = 0.009) and lower HRR (22 ± 16 vs 32 ± 21, p <0.0001). In an adjusted Cox model, the lowest tertile HRR was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 2.1) and cardiac death/nonfatal MI (hazard ratio 2.9; p <0.01). Patients in the highest HRR tertile, irrespective of the Adult Treatment Panel III category, were at low risk. When added to the Adult Treatment Panel III categories, the HRR resulted in net reclassification improvement in mortality of 18% and cardiac death/nonfatal MI of 22%. In conclusion, a blunted HRR to vasodilator stress was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and overall mortality in patients with normal vasodilator MPI findings. The HRR correctly reclassified a substantial proportion of these patients in addition to the traditional risk classification models and identified patients with normal vasodilator MPI findings, who had a truly low risk of events.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23111139     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  Heart rate response to regadenoson: Making the case for its value in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging performed pre-renal transplantation: post-transplantation follow-up and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher W Ives; Wael A AlJaroudi; Vineeta Kumar; Ayman Farag; Dana V Rizk; Suzanne Oparil; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The prognostic value of regadenoson stress: Has the case been made?

Authors:  Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Effect of changes in perfusion defect size during serial regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Stephanie El-Hajj; Wael A AlJaroudi; Ayman Farag; Steven Bleich; Padma Manaoragada; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prognostic value of heart rate response during regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Tania Campagnoli; Ibtihaj Fughhi; Marwan Wassouf; Amjad Ali; Rami Doukky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The dark side of the moon of coronary vasodilation.

Authors:  Raffaele Giubbini; Francesco Bertagna
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?

Authors:  Matthew Topel; Leslee J Shaw; Joe X Xie
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  The heart rate response to regadenoson in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anezi I Uzendu; Ami Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Regadenoson: a focused update.

Authors:  Gopal Ghimire; Fadi G Hage; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.