Literature DB >> 29879285

Association of Dorsal Reduction and Tip Rotation With Social Perception.

Cherian K Kandathil1, Mikhail Saltychev2, Sami P Moubayed3, Sam P Most1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Social perception by laypersons of people who have undergone rhinoplasty primarily for cosmetic purposes has not been fully described.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the social perception of patients who have undergone cosmetic rhinoplasty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Preoperative images of 4 patients with dorsal hump and tip ptosis were selected using the Delphi method. Computer simulations of dorsal hump reduction and tip rotation, alone or in combination, were performed. Using the Qualtrics internet-based survey platform, laypersons blinded to the purpose of the study viewed randomized original and simulated images and estimated the age, approachability, perceived success, overall health, intelligence, and rated their attractiveness on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Comparison of responses (mean [SD] score) for each of the 3 types of simulated image against the original image employing a pairwise comparison of means (Dunnett test).
RESULTS: After excluding 27 (4%) invalid responses, a total of 813 respondents (593 women and 220 men) were included in the study. The mean (SD) age was 44.6 (16.2) years. A total of 628 (77%) respondents were white and the observed highest level of education was a bachelor's degree (193 [24%]) or having attended college but without a diploma (194 [24%]). A significant age reduction (31 [10] years; 95% CI, -2.5 to 0; P = .04) and an increase in approachability (64 [22]; 95% CI, 0.7-5.8; P = .009), attractiveness (60 [22]; 95% CI, 4.0-9.4; P < .001), and health (70 [19]; 95% CI, 0.7-5.2; P = .006) for the simulation involving hump reduction was observed. When combined simulation of dorsum and tip rotation were tested, only significant increases in attractiveness (60 [23]; 95% CI, 3.6-9.0; P < .001) and health (69 [19]; 95% CI, 0.1-4.6; P = .03) were seen. No significant association was found for any of the responses when the tip alone was rotated. The Wilks λ varied slightly below 1.0 showing significant P values (P < .05) for all variance and covariance (respondent particulars). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Though rhinoplasty procedures for nasal cosmesis involving both the nasal dorsum and tip were perceived to make a person more attractive and healthier, these results suggest that manipulation of the dorsum is more strongly associated with perception of the nose. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29879285      PMCID: PMC6233610          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  20 in total

1.  Altering first impressions after facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Steven Dayan; Kirk Clark; Allan A Ho
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry.

Authors:  S A Reza Nouraei; Maria A Pulido; Hesham A Saleh
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2009 May-Jun

3.  Does facial plastic surgery alter the social perception of patients by others: a cross-national perspective.

Authors:  H D Vuyk; E Cambridge; B J Doosje; M W deVries
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  The straight truth: measuring observer attention to the crooked nose.

Authors:  Andres Godoy; Masaru Ishii; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Carlos O Encarnacion; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Shannon F Rudy; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Aesthetic surgery: effects of rhinoplasty on the social perception of patients by others.

Authors:  T F Cash; C E Horton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Toward an interdisciplinary psychology of appearances.

Authors:  S M Kalick
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.458

8.  Perceived functional impact of abnormal facial appearance.

Authors:  Marlene Rankin; Gregory L Borah
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The Nose Influences Visual and Personality Perception.

Authors:  Olaf van Schijndel; Abel-Jan Tasman; Ralph Litschel
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.446

10.  Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Garrison Cottrell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Social Perception of the Nasal Dorsal Contour in Male Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Brian Nuyen; Cherian K Kandathil; Mikhail Saltychev; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  A Review and Modification of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques.

Authors:  Priyesh N Patel; Mohamed Abdelwahab; Sam P Most
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.