Literature DB >> 31219525

Social Perception of the Nasal Dorsal Contour in Male Rhinoplasty.

Brian Nuyen1, Cherian K Kandathil1, Mikhail Saltychev2, Sam P Most1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The social perception of nasal dorsal modification for male rhinoplasty is poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of modifying the male nasal dorsum with the perception of such social attributes as youth, approachability, healthiness, masculinity/femininity, intelligence, successfulness, and leadership. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using computer simulation software, 12 images with varied combinations of the nasal dorsal shape, nasofrontal angle (NFA), and nasolabial angle (NLA) were generated from a photograph of a male volunteer's face in profile. These photographs were then sent to participants at a university clinic who were English-speaking adult internet users who were masked to the purpose of the study, which asked them to value different social attributes regarding the face in the photograph in a 16-question survey. The study was conducted in September 2018 and the data were analyzed thereafter until March 2019. EXPOSURES: Twelve photographs embedded in a 16-question survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Population proportions of responses and χ2 test and graphical analysis based on 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Of 503 respondents (survey provision rate, 100%), 412 (81.9%) were women, 386 (76.7%) were white, 32 (6.4%) were Hispanic or Latinx, 63 (12.5%) were black/African American, 10 (2.0%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, and the median age was 46 years (interquartile range, 32-61 years). The man with ski slope-shaped nose with an NFA of 130° and NLA of 97° was often associated with frequently perceived positive characteristics; specifically, he was judged to be the most attractive (95% CI, 18%-26%; P < .001). Participants also often associated superlative youth (95% CI, 15%-24%; P < .001), approachability (95% CI, 13%-20%; P = .002), and femininity (95% CI, 14%-22%; P < .001) with dorsal contours that did not feature a dorsal hump. The man with a dorsal hump-shaped nose with an NFA of 140° and NLA of 105° was associated by the highest proportion of participants with being the oldest (95% CI, 35%-44%; P < .001), least approachable (95% CI, 27%-35%; P < .001), least attractive (95% CI, 37%-42%; P < .001), and least healthy (95% CI, 26%-34%; P < .001). Subset analyses also revealed statistically significant dorsal contour preferences by observers' age, gender, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A reduced dorsal slope combined with more acute NFAs and NLAs was associated with positively perceived social attributes. The results may be of interest to rhinoplasty surgeons and their male patients when planning changes to the nasal dorsal contour. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31219525      PMCID: PMC6587145          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  21 in total

1.  Facial Skin Smoothness as an Indicator of Perceived Trustworthiness and Related Traits.

Authors:  Elena Tsankova; Arvid Kappas
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Metrics of nasal tip rotation: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  David W Kim; Kristin K Egan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Nasofrontal Angle and Nasal Dorsal Aesthetics: A Quantitative Investigation of Idealized and Normative Values.

Authors:  Farhad B Naini; Martyn T Cobourne; Umberto Garagiola; Fraser McDonald; David Wertheim
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Coloration in different areas of facial skin is a cue to health: The role of cheek redness and periorbital luminance in health perception.

Authors:  Alex L Jones; Aurélie Porcheron; Jennifer R Sweda; Frederique Morizot; Richard Russell
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2016-03-09

5.  Nasofrontal angle changes in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  R C Webster; T M Davidson; R C Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979)       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb

6.  Defining the ideal nasolabial angle.

Authors:  Bryan S Armijo; Matthew Brown; Bahman Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: A quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values.

Authors:  Farhad B Naini; Martyn T Cobourne; Umberto Garagiola; Fraser McDonald; David Wertheim
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Thomas F Denson; Barnaby J Dixson; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mentolabial angle and aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values.

Authors:  Farhad B Naini; Martyn T Cobourne; Umberto Garagiola; Fraser McDonald; David Wertheim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-02-05

10.  Looking like a leader-facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability.

Authors:  Daniel E Re; David W Hunter; Vinet Coetzee; Bernard P Tiddeman; Dengke Xiao; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Forehead Contouring as an Adjunct to Rhinoplasty: Evaluation of the Effect on Facial Appearance, Personal Traits and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Oguzhan Demirel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.326

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.