Literature DB >> 19451455

Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry.

S A Reza Nouraei1, Maria A Pulido, Hesham A Saleh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of rhinoplasty on the objective measurement and subjective appreciation of facial symmetry and to investigate whether perceptual shifts are correlated with objective changes in facial proportions.
DESIGN: Frontal view photographs were used to measure bilateral symmetry ratios of the medial and lateral canthi, tragus, ala, and oral commissure in 100 patients before and 6 months after rhinoplasty. Gestalt dichotomous impressions of facial symmetry were also obtained in all cases. Paired t tests and chi(2) tests were used to compare facial proportions and the proportion of faces perceived as symmetrical, respectively, before and after surgery. The receiver operating characteristic and analysis of variance were used to assess whether perceptual shifts in symmetry could be correlated with objectively measurable changes in facial proportion.
RESULTS: The number of faces perceived as symmetrical increased from 42 to 62 after rhinoplasty (P < .001, chi(2) test). Objectively, midline-to-ala symmetry increased from an average of 91.1% (5.5%) (mean [SD]) to 93.8% (4.5%) after rhinoplasty (P < .001, paired t test). Other facial proportions did not change significantly (P > .10). The degree of change in midline-to-ala symmetry was the only objective measure that was significantly associated with the subjective perception of the face as symmetrical or asymmetrical (P < .01, 1-way analysis of variance). Most positive perceptual shifts were associated with an objective improvement in nasal symmetry that was greater than 2%. Conversely, most negative perceptual shifts were associated with minimal postoperative improvement or loss of nasal symmetry.
CONCLUSION: Rhinoplasty leads to objectively measurable changes in nasal symmetry that correspond with psychophysical modifications in the perception of a face as symmetrical or asymmetrical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451455     DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  6 in total

1.  Combination of the Push-Down and Let-Down Techniques: Mix-Down Approaches.

Authors:  Güncel Öztürk
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.

Authors:  Ahmet Oğuz Şahan; Burçin Akan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Rhinoplasty and facial asymmetry: Analysis of subjective and anthropometric factors in the Caucasian nose.

Authors:  Bettina Carvalho; Annelyse Christine Ballin; Renata Vecentin Becker; Cezar Augusto Sarraff Berger; Johann G G Melcherts Hurtado; Marcos Mocellin
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  Aesthetic rhinoplasty plus brow, eyelid and conchal surgery: pitfalls - complications - prevention.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gubisch; Andreas Dacho
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 5.  Prevalence of Facial Asymmetry and Correction Methods for Rhinoplasty in Individuals with Deviated Nose: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Seyed Mostafa Hashemi; Elnaz Afshari; Hossein Ghazavi
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07

6.  Association of Dorsal Reduction and Tip Rotation With Social Perception.

Authors:  Cherian K Kandathil; Mikhail Saltychev; Sami P Moubayed; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.