Ross A Little1, Yann Jamin1, Jessica K R Boult1, Josephine H Naish1, Yvonne Watson1, Susan Cheung1, Katherine F Holliday1, Huiqi Lu1, Damien J McHugh1, Joely Irlam1, Catharine M L West1, Guy N Betts1, Garry Ashton1, Andrew R Reynolds1, Satish Maddineni1, Noel W Clarke1, Geoff J M Parker1, John C Waterton1, Simon P Robinson1, James P B O'Connor1. 1. From the Centre for Imaging Sciences (R.A.L., J.H.N., Y.W., S.C., K.F.H., H.L., D.J.M., G.J.M.P., J.C.W.) and Division of Cancer Sciences (J.I., C.M.L.W., N.W.C., J.P.B.O.), University of Manchester, Manchester, England; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (Y.J., J.K.R.B., S.P.R.); Department of Pathology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (G.N.B.); Department of Histology, CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, England (G.A.); Tumour Biology Team, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (A.R.R.); Department of Urology, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, England (S.M., N.W.C.); Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, England (G.J.M.P., J.C.W.); and Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England (J.P.B.O.).
Abstract
Purpose To cross-validate T1-weighted oxygen-enhanced (OE) MRI measurements of tumor hypoxia with intrinsic susceptibility MRI measurements and to demonstrate the feasibility of translation of the technique for patients. Materials and Methods Preclinical studies in nine 786-0-R renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenografts and prospective clinical studies in eight patients with RCC were performed. Longitudinal relaxation rate changes (∆R1) after 100% oxygen inhalation were quantified, reflecting the paramagnetic effect on tissue protons because of the presence of molecular oxygen. Native transverse relaxation rate (R2*) and oxygen-induced R2* change (∆R2*) were measured, reflecting presence of deoxygenated hemoglobin molecules. Median and voxel-wise values of ∆R1 were compared with values of R2* and ∆R2*. Tumor regions with dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MRI perfusion, refractory to signal change at OE MRI (referred to as perfused Oxy-R), were distinguished from perfused oxygen-enhancing (perfused Oxy-E) and nonperfused regions. R2* and ∆R2* values in each tumor subregion were compared by using one-way analysis of variance. Results Tumor-wise and voxel-wise ∆R1 and ∆R2* comparisons did not show correlative relationships. In xenografts, parcellation analysis revealed that perfused Oxy-R regions had faster native R2* (102.4 sec-1 vs 81.7 sec-1) and greater negative ∆R2* (-22.9 sec-1 vs -5.4 sec-1), compared with perfused Oxy-E and nonperfused subregions (all P < .001), respectively. Similar findings were present in human tumors (P < .001). Further, perfused Oxy-R helped identify tumor hypoxia, measured at pathologic analysis, in both xenografts (P = .002) and human tumors (P = .003). Conclusion Intrinsic susceptibility biomarkers provide cross validation of the OE MRI biomarker perfused Oxy-R. Consistent relationship to pathologic analyses was found in xenografts and human tumors, demonstrating biomarker translation. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Purpose To cross-validate T1-weighted oxygen-enhanced (OE) MRI measurements of tumor hypoxia with intrinsic susceptibility MRI measurements and to demonstrate the feasibility of translation of the technique for patients. Materials and Methods Preclinical studies in nine 786-0-R renal cell carcinoma (RCC) xenografts and prospective clinical studies in eight patients with RCC were performed. Longitudinal relaxation rate changes (∆R1) after 100% oxygen inhalation were quantified, reflecting the paramagnetic effect on tissue protons because of the presence of molecular oxygen. Native transverse relaxation rate (R2*) and oxygen-induced R2* change (∆R2*) were measured, reflecting presence of deoxygenated hemoglobin molecules. Median and voxel-wise values of ∆R1 were compared with values of R2* and ∆R2*. Tumor regions with dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MRI perfusion, refractory to signal change at OE MRI (referred to as perfused Oxy-R), were distinguished from perfused oxygen-enhancing (perfused Oxy-E) and nonperfused regions. R2* and ∆R2* values in each tumor subregion were compared by using one-way analysis of variance. Results Tumor-wise and voxel-wise ∆R1 and ∆R2* comparisons did not show correlative relationships. In xenografts, parcellation analysis revealed that perfused Oxy-R regions had faster native R2* (102.4 sec-1 vs 81.7 sec-1) and greater negative ∆R2* (-22.9 sec-1 vs -5.4 sec-1), compared with perfused Oxy-E and nonperfused subregions (all P < .001), respectively. Similar findings were present in humantumors (P < .001). Further, perfused Oxy-R helped identify tumor hypoxia, measured at pathologic analysis, in both xenografts (P = .002) and humantumors (P = .003). Conclusion Intrinsic susceptibility biomarkers provide cross validation of the OE MRI biomarker perfused Oxy-R. Consistent relationship to pathologic analyses was found in xenografts and humantumors, demonstrating biomarker translation. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Hypoxia results from an imbalance between oxygen delivery and demand (1). Tumor hypoxia is an important negative
prognostic factor in humancancers (2–4) and predicts treatment
failure to both radiation therapy (5) and
numerous chemotherapeutic agents (6). Interest
in modifying or exploiting hypoxia has driven attempts to develop new treatments for
use in combination with radiation therapy and chemotherapy (7). Effective development and delivery of these treatments
requires imaging biomarkers that can rapidly identify and accurately assess the
extent and spatial distribution of tumor hypoxia (8).MRI techniques are being investigated for delivering translational biomarkers of
hypoxia (9). Historically, interest has
focused on intrinsic susceptibility imaging, which quantifies native values of
effective transverse relaxation rate (R2*) and the change in R2*
(∆R2*) induced by respiratory challenge with hyperoxic gas (10,11).
However, there has been recent interest in quantifying the change in the
longitudinal relaxation rate (R1) after inhalation of 100% oxygen (12). In this latter technique, referred to as
oxygen-enhanced (OE) MRI, paramagnetic oxygen molecules dissolved in blood plasma,
interstitial tissue fluid, or intracellular water can induce changes in R1
(∆R1) (13). Numerous studies (14–18) have reported an increase in R1 in well-oxygenated tissues after
challenge with hyperoxic gas. In hypoxic tissue, the inhaled oxygen molecules bind
preferentially to deoxygenated hemoglobin molecules, converting the paramagnetic
deoxyhemoglobin to diamagnetic oxyhemoglobin. Hence, in hypoxic tumor subregions,
there is no measurable positive ∆R1 (19).We recently showed (20,21) in multiple preclinical xenograft models that tumor voxels
with demonstrable perfusion but absent ∆R1 (oxygen refractory on R1 mapping
referred to as perfused Oxy-R) represent a noninvasive signature of hypoxia at MRI.
This finding suggests that OE MRI may have a translational benefit compared with
R2*-based methods. Previous studies reported complex and nonlinear
relationships between ∆R1 and ∆R2* in xenografts (22–26) or patienttumors (27) (Fig 1). However, to our knowledge, no
cross-validation has been performed to evaluate whether perfused Oxy-R– and
R2*-based biomarkers measure the same underlying tumor biology.
Figure 1:
Schematic representation of postulated relationship between oxygen-induced
change in R2*
(∆R*) and change
in R1 (∆R) MRI
biomarkers of tumor hypoxia. It is postulated that change in R1 measures
increase in dissolved oxygen in tissue. The theoretical relationships
between voxels with different perfusion and oxygenation status are
considered, along with physics confounds, such as inflow effects.
Hypothetical distributions of voxels are indicated for normoxic (yellow),
hypoxic (blue), and nonperfused (gray) tumor subregions.
Schematic representation of postulated relationship between oxygen-induced
change in R2*
(∆R*) and change
in R1 (∆R) MRI
biomarkers of tumor hypoxia. It is postulated that change in R1 measures
increase in dissolved oxygen in tissue. The theoretical relationships
between voxels with different perfusion and oxygenation status are
considered, along with physics confounds, such as inflow effects.
Hypothetical distributions of voxels are indicated for normoxic (yellow),
hypoxic (blue), and nonperfused (gray) tumor subregions.In our study, we hypothesized that tumor subregions identified as perfused Oxy-R
would have faster native R2* and greater negative ∆R2*. We
investigated this spatial relationship by using a renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
xenograft model in which perfused Oxy-R was previously validated with pathologic
measurement of hypoxia (21). We then
performed a clinical study in patients with RCC tumors. The purpose was to
cross-validate a T1-weighted OE MRI measurement of tumor hypoxia with
T2*-weighted intrinsic susceptibility MRI measurements and to demonstrate the
feasibility of translation of the technique into patients.
Materials and Methods
AstraZeneca provided a salary to one author (K.F.H.). Two researchers provided
consultancy to Bioxydyn (G.J.M.P. and J.C.W.). Authors who are not employees of or
consultants for AstraZeneca and Bioxydyn had full control of inclusion of any
data.
Preclinical MR Data Acquisition
Experiments were performed in compliance with licenses issued under the UK
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, following local ethical review, and
the United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute guidelines for animal
welfare in cancer research (28). The
subcutaneous 786–0 RCC xenograft model (29), detailed MRI analysis, and pathologic analysis are described in
Appendix E1
(online).When the tumors were approximately 400 mm3, tumors were evaluated on a
7.0-T horizontal bore MRI system (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). Details of the
anesthesia procedure are in Appendix E1 (online). After localization and shimming over the
tumor, one axial imaging section was collected for all functional sequences. One
R2* measurement was performed before and after the OE MRI sequence.
Finally, dynamic contrast agent–enhanced (DCE) MRI (30) was performed while the mice inhaled 100% oxygen to
define tumor perfusion. Functional imaging sequences (Table 1)were as follows:
Table 1:
Imaging Sequence Details
*3.1-msec echo spacing
†5-msec echo spacing
Intrinsic susceptibility imaging: multiple gradient-echo images to
derive R2*.OE MRI: inversion recovery true-fast imaging with steady-state
precession images to derive R1 at baseline and dynamically
throughout the gas challenge. The dynamic series was performed for
10 minutes 40 seconds. This sequence is relatively insensitive to
inflow effects.DCE MRI: R1 was measured by using a modified true-fast imaging with
steady-state precession sequence. After five baseline measurements,
0.1 mmol/kg bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Bayer,
Leverkusen, Germany) was injected intravenously at 2 mL/min by using
a power injector. The dynamic series was acquired for 10 minutes 40
seconds.Imaging Sequence Details*3.1-msec echo spacing†5-msec echo spacing
Clinical Study MRI Data Acquisition
Studies were performed after research ethics approval and institutional board
review. Oxygen administration was not regarded as an investigational medicinal
product study after consultation with the UK Medicines and Health Care Products
Regulatory Agency. All patients gave fully informed written consent.Patients with surgically resectable RCC (stage T1–T3, N0, M0) were
recruited before nephrectomy. Subsequent immunohistochemical detection of the
hypoxia-regulated gene glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) provided
an indirect assessment of tumor hypoxia (31).Gas delivery (medical air or 100% oxygen) was at 15 L/min through a
nonrebreathing mask (Adult EcoLite High Concentration Oxygen mask;
InterSurgical, Berkshire, England). Oxygen concentration in the mask was
monitored continuously (ML206 Gas Analyzer and Powerlab 8/35; ADInstruments,
Oxford, England) and analyzed (LabChart version 7.3.4; ADInstruments).Data were acquired by using a 1.5-T horizontal bore magnet (Philips Healthcare,
Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Patients were imaged in the supine position with
the scanner body resonator (Q body coil; Philips Healthcare) used in transmit
and receive mode. After localization, one oblique coronal section was acquired
that matched the coronal plane of the tumor-bearing kidney. Single R2*
measurements were collected before and after the OE MRI sequence. Finally, DCE
MRI was performed. Functional imaging sequences (summarized in Table 1) were as follows:Intrinsic susceptibility imaging: multiple gradient-echo images to
calculate R2*.OE MRI: Inversion recovery half-Fourier rapid acquisition with
relaxation enhancement images to calculate R1 at baseline and
dynamically throughout the gas challenge. Dynamic images were used
to quantify the temporal onset of R1 changes induced by switching
between air and 100% oxygen (switch performed after nine baseline
measurements).DCE MRI: Native R1 was measured by using a variable flip angle
spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Time varying R1 was determined by
relating the time varying signal change to the native R1. After 14
baseline measurements, 0.1 mmol/kg bolus of gadoterate meglumine
(Dotarem; Guerbet, Paris, France) was injected intravenously at 3
mL/min by using a power injector (Medrad Spectris MR; Bayer,
Leverkusen, Germany), followed by a 20-mL saline flush.
MRI Data Analysis
Regions of interest were drawn for tumors on the T2-weighted images by
experienced operators (Y.J., with 13 years of preclinical experience, and Y.W.,
with 16 years of clinical experience) and transferred to the intrinsic
susceptibility, OE MRI, and DCE MRI data for each tumor. Voxel-wise values of
native R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R2*, and oxygen-induced ∆R1
were calculated for all parameters by using in-house software from which median
values were derived.For intrinsic susceptibility MRI, the voxel-wise native R2* was calculated
by using the air-only data. Next, the ∆R2* was calculated as
∆R2* = R2* (O2) − R2* (air), where
O2 is oxygen. At OE MRI, the voxel-wise ∆R1 was calculated
as ∆R1 = R1 (O2) − R1 (air). At DCE MRI, voxels
were classified as perfused or nonperfused (32).For combined OE and DCE MRI analysis, voxels were classified as enhancing
(hereafter, referred to as Oxy-E) or refractory (hereafter, referred to as
Oxy-R) to oxygen challenge and then further subclassified as perfused or
nonperfused by using DCE MRI data. From this, three subregions were defined:
normoxic, composed of perfused Oxy-E voxels; hypoxic, composed of perfused Oxy-R
voxels; and nonperfused voxels (Fig
2).
Figure 2:
Schematic representation of analysis method used to define tumor
subregions. A, For each preclinical and clinical tumor,
a T2-weighted (T2w) anatomic image is used to define a region
of interest (tumor; arrow), then oxygen-enhanced (OE) MR images and
dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images are analyzed to generate maps
of change in longitudinal relaxation rate (∆R1) and the initial
area under the gadolinium uptake curve from 0 to 60 seconds after
injection of Gd-DTPA (IAUC60), respectively.
B, The ∆R1 and IAUC60 data were
binarized to produce binary enhancement maps, and then,
C, combined to generate a map with three categories
of voxels: perfused and OE, perfused but oxygen-refractory, and
nonperfused.
Schematic representation of analysis method used to define tumor
subregions. A, For each preclinical and clinical tumor,
a T2-weighted (T2w) anatomic image is used to define a region
of interest (tumor; arrow), then oxygen-enhanced (OE) MR images and
dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images are analyzed to generate maps
of change in longitudinal relaxation rate (∆R1) and the initial
area under the gadolinium uptake curve from 0 to 60 seconds after
injection of Gd-DTPA (IAUC60), respectively.
B, The ∆R1 and IAUC60 data were
binarized to produce binary enhancement maps, and then,
C, combined to generate a map with three categories
of voxels: perfused and OE, perfused but oxygen-refractory, and
nonperfused.
Statistical Analysis
For both preclinical and clinical studies, median values of the MRI biomarkers
(native R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R2*, and oxygen-induced
∆R1) and voxel-wise values were compared by using Spearman ρ. The
relationship of the voxel-wise R2* and ∆R2* to perfused Oxy-R
voxels, perfused Oxy-E voxels, and nonperfused voxels was evaluated by one-way
analysis of variance.The relationship of tissue pathology to MRI biomarkers (native R2*,
oxygen-induced ∆R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R1, and perfused Oxy-R)
in the 786–0-R xenografts was analyzed by using Spearman ρ.
Clinical tumors were designated as either low or high in hypoxic fraction by
semi-quantitative pathology, and the values of perfused Oxy-R were compared
between these two groups by using the Student t test. In all
cases, P values less than .05 were considered to indicate
statistical significance following Bonferroni correction when multiple
comparisons were tested.
Results
R1 Biomarkers But Not R2* Biomarkers Relate to Hypoxia in 786–0-R
Xenographs
The relationships of MRI biomarkers of hypoxia and tissue pathologic assessment
were determined in the 786–0-R xenografts. Median values of native
R2* and oxygen-induced ∆R2* taken across the entire image did
not correlate with the hypoxic fraction measured at pimonidazole adduct
formation (Figs 3a, 3b). Hypoxic fraction was related to median values of
oxygen-induced ∆R1 (ρ, −0.783; P =
.013; Fig 3c) and the perfused Oxy-R
fraction (ρ, 0.902; P = .002; Fig 3d).
Figure 3a:
Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).
Figure 3b:
Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).
Figure 3c:
Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).
Figure 3d:
Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).
Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).Graphs show the correlations between hypoxic fraction (expressed as a
percentage and calculated from pimonidazole adduct formation
immunohistochemistry images) and MRI biomarkers in 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice. Hypoxia did not
correlate with (a) native R2*
(R2*) or (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2* (∆R2*), but it
did correlate with (c) oxygen-induced change in R1
(∆R1) and (d) percentage of tumor
perfused Oxy-R (nine mice for a–c and
eight mice for d).
Subregional Analysis Reveals the R2* and R1 Biomarker Relationship in
786–0-R Xenographs
The relationship between R2* and R1 biomarkers was compared. Initially,
tumor-wise and voxel-wise analyses were investigated by following existing
literature. Next, we used the combined OE and DCE MRI analysis to define the
three subregions perfused Oxy-E tumor, perfused Oxy-Rtumor, and nonperfused
tumor.Median values of native
R2* and oxygen-induced ∆R2* were compared with median values of
∆R1 for each tumor. No significant correlations were observed.Native R2* and
∆R1 did not have a significant relationship. In distinction, there was a
highly significant but weak correlation between ∆R2* and ∆R1
(ρ, 0.230; P < .001; Fig E1 [online]). Voxels
with greater negative gas-induced ∆R2* showed a smaller positive
∆R1, consistent with both being biomarkers of hypoxia. However, the
relationship between ∆R2* and ∆R1 appeared complex and was
not explained simply by the bimodal relationship predicted by the open L-shaped
curve (24,27) (Fig 1).We defined
subregional analysis on the basis of the hypoxia biomarker perfused Oxy-R. This
approach was chosen because we had previously validated Oxy-R as a hypoxia
biomarker in this xenograft model (21).
Three subregions were defined on the basis of combined OE MRI and DCE MRI
signals (Fig 1). Native R2* and
oxygen-induced ∆R2* were compared for each of these subregions. In
all, 5815 voxels were included and analyzed, of which 488 (8.4%) were
nonperfused; 4547 (78.2%) were defined as perfused Oxy-E, suggestive of a
normoxic profile; and 780 (13.4%) were defined as perfused Oxy-R, suggestive of
a hypoxic profile. Perfused Oxy-R voxels had faster native R2*
(P < .001; Fig
4a) and greater negative hyperoxia-induced ∆R2*
(P < .001; Fig
4b) than the perfused Oxy-E and nonperfused voxels. Example tumor
parametric maps are shown with corresponding pathologic validation across the
range of hypoxia measured (Fig 5).
Figure 4a:
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2* (R2*) and
(b) oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions categorized by
perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused (NP), and perfused Oxy-R in 786–0-R
tumors propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice
(n = 8). Data are medians and interquartile
range.
Figure 4b:
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2* (R2*) and
(b) oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions categorized by
perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused (NP), and perfused Oxy-R in 786–0-R
tumors propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice
(n = 8). Data are medians and interquartile
range.
Figure 5:
Representative parametric maps of change in R2*
(∆R2*), change in R1
(∆R1), and combined oxygen-enhanced MRI and
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (quantifying perfused Oxy-E, perfused
Oxy-R, and nonperfused tumor) are shown for three 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice, showing least, middle
and greatest hypoxic fractions (HF) measured by pimonidazole adduct
formation.
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2* (R2*) and
(b) oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions categorized by
perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused (NP), and perfused Oxy-R in 786–0-R
tumors propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice
(n = 8). Data are medians and interquartile
range.Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2* (R2*) and
(b) oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions categorized by
perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused (NP), and perfused Oxy-R in 786–0-R
tumors propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice
(n = 8). Data are medians and interquartile
range.Representative parametric maps of change in R2*
(∆R2*), change in R1
(∆R1), and combined oxygen-enhanced MRI and
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (quantifying perfused Oxy-E, perfused
Oxy-R, and nonperfused tumor) are shown for three 786–0-R tumors
propagated in 8-week-old female C.B17-scid mice, showing least, middle
and greatest hypoxic fractions (HF) measured by pimonidazole adduct
formation.
Technique Translation to Clinical Data
To test clinical translation, we recruited seven patients with clear cell RCC at
radiologic assessment that was confirmed at subsequent histopathologic analysis
(Table 2). The combined OE MRI and
DCE MRI analysis requires reliable definition of voxels that are refractory to
oxygen challenge. Data from the ML206 gas analyzer in all seven patients showed
statistically significant increase in oxygen concentration to greater than 90%
during gas challenge (sample trace in Fig E2 [online]).
Table 2:
Patient Demographics, Stage, and Biomarker Values
Note.—∆R1 = change in R1, ∆R2* =
change in R2*, F = female, M = male, NA = not
available.
*Failed quality control for oxygen-enhanced MRI ∆R1 and
∆R2*.
Patient Demographics, Stage, and Biomarker ValuesNote.—∆R1 = change in R1, ∆R2* =
change in R2*, F = female, M = male, NA = not
available.*Failed quality control for oxygen-enhanced MRI ∆R1 and
∆R2*.As an additional quality control step, we evaluated the ∆R1 in the renal
cortex to act as a positive control for oxygen delivery because positive
∆R1 has been consistently reported in multiple OE MRI studies (15–17) of the kidney. We evaluated renal cortex regions of interest for
evidence of oxygen enhancement (Fig E3a [online]) and generated combined OE MRI and DCE MRI
maps for these regions (Fig
E3b [online]). These analyses showed that whereas all patients
received high concentration oxygen, one patient failed to inhale the gas
sufficiently to generate signal change in the renal cortex (only 3.0% of voxels
were oxygen enhancing). All other patients with renal cortex in the field of
view had significant positive ∆R1 in the renal cortex with between 83.7%
and 100% (mean, 95.4%) of OE voxels (Table
2). Patient 7 had no normal kidney included in the field of view, but
equivalent analysis of the spleen confirmed successful oxygen enhancement.
Consistent Relationship between R2* and R1 Biomarkers Found in Human RCC
Tumors
The analyses developed in the 786–0-R xenografts were applied to the
patient data. Patient 6 tumor data were excluded because this patient failed
quality control checks on the basis of renal cortex analysis. This tumor did not
show significant oxygen enhancement in 84.3% of its voxels (Fig E4 [online]), which
is consistent with a failure in gas delivery.Median values of native
R2* and gas-induced ∆R2* were compared with median values of
∆R1 for each tumor (n = 6). No significant
correlations were observed.Native R2* and
∆R1 did not have a significant relationship. However, there was a highly
significant but weak correlation between ∆R2* and ∆R1
(ρ, 0.035; P < .001). Voxels with greater negative
gas-induced ∆R2* showed a smaller change in R1 (Fig E5 [online]).Native R2* and
gas-induced ∆R2* were compared for each of three subregions, defined
by their combined signals at OE MRI and DCE MRI. In total, 4112 voxels were
measured, of which 436 (10.6%) were nonperfused, 2887 (70.2%) were defined as
perfused Oxy-E suggestive of a normoxic profile, and 789 (19.2%) were defined as
perfused Oxy-R suggestive of a hypoxic profile. Statistically significant
differences were observed between the perfused Oxy-R voxels (predicted to be
hypoxic) and both the perfused Oxy-E and the nonperfused voxels, with faster
native R2* and a greater negative gas-induced ∆R2* in the
perfused Oxy-R voxels (both P < .001) (Figs 6a, 6b).
Figure 6a:
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2*
(R2*) and (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions
categorized by perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused Oxy-R, and perfused Oxy-R in
patients with renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). Data
are medians and interquartile range.
Figure 6b:
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2*
(R2*) and (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions
categorized by perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused Oxy-R, and perfused Oxy-R in
patients with renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). Data
are medians and interquartile range.
Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2*
(R2*) and (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions
categorized by perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused Oxy-R, and perfused Oxy-R in
patients with renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). Data
are medians and interquartile range.Box-and-whisker plots show relationship of voxel values of
(a) native R2*
(R2*) and (b)
oxygen-induced change in R2*
(∆R2*) to tumor subregions
categorized by perfused Oxy-E, nonperfused Oxy-R, and perfused Oxy-R in
patients with renal cell carcinoma (n = 6). Data
are medians and interquartile range.In an exploratory analysis, we scored tumor hypoxia by GLUT1
staining. Although the study was not powered formally, the four tumors with MRI
low hypoxic fraction (9.1%, 6.6%, 1.8%, and 0.6%) had GLUT1hypoxia scores of 4.2, 2, 10.3, and 1.7, respectively, whereas the two tumors
with high MRI hypoxic fraction (31.7% and 28.8%) had GLUT1hypoxia scores of 19.5 and 41.7, respectively (Fig 7). Therefore, OE MRI helped to categorize the six patienttumors into two groups and helped to detect significant separation in
GLUT1hypoxia score (P = .003).
Figure 7:
Relationship of perfused Oxy-R to hypoxia in patients with renal cell
carcinoma. Parametric maps of perfused Oxy-E, perfused Oxy-R, and
nonperfused subregions are shown for four patients with relatively low
perfused Oxy-R fraction, with immunohistochemistry images for the
hypoxia-regulated gene glucose transporter 1 used to obtain an indirect
assessment of tumor hypoxia. For comparison, equivalent parameter maps
and immunohistochemistry images (magnification, 40×) are shown for
two patients with relatively high perfused Oxy-R fraction.
Relationship of perfused Oxy-R to hypoxia in patients with renal cell
carcinoma. Parametric maps of perfused Oxy-E, perfused Oxy-R, and
nonperfused subregions are shown for four patients with relatively low
perfused Oxy-R fraction, with immunohistochemistry images for the
hypoxia-regulated gene glucose transporter 1 used to obtain an indirect
assessment of tumor hypoxia. For comparison, equivalent parameter maps
and immunohistochemistry images (magnification, 40×) are shown for
two patients with relatively high perfused Oxy-R fraction.
Discussion
There is a need to develop noninvasive biomarkers of tumor hypoxia. Potential
applications include identifying patients who would benefit from modifying hypoxia
before radiation therapy (7), identifying
persistence of hypoxia during conventional treatment regimens (33), mapping targets for radiation boost or adaptive therapy
(34), and monitoring changes in tumors
treated with hypoxia-modifying therapies (7).Whereas biomarkers have enormous potential in cancer, most failed to translate into
practice-changing tools (35). Consequently,
there is growing recognition that imaging biomarkers in development must undergo
rigorous technical and biologic validation before they can be qualified as
clinically useful (36).Proton MRI methods are attractive because they are readily available and provide a
cost-effective source of spatially localized information for various structural,
functional, and molecular biomarkers of cancer (12). In this study, we sought to cross-validate oxygen-induced changes
in R1, particularly the biomarker perfused Oxy-R, with the MRI biomarkers native
R2* and oxygen-induced ∆R2*. This step is important because these
different putative approaches to mapping hypoxia rely on different mechanisms and if
measurements made by using these different approaches are mutually consistent, their
validity is supported according to the Hill principle of coherence (37).Initially, we compared four biomarkers of hypoxia measured tumor-wise (native
R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R1, and perfused
Oxy-R). The two R1-based biomarkers had significant relation to the
pimonidazole-positive fraction in the well-vascularized but hypoxic 786–0-R
RCC xenograft model, whereas native R2* and ∆R2* did not. At first,
this supports the hypothesis that R1-based imaging biomarkers measure hypoxia, but
it refutes the hypothesis that R2*- and R1-based imaging biomarkers identified
the same hypoxic tumor subregions.Next, we compared three biomarkers of tumor hypoxia with voxel-wise measurement
(native R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R2*, oxygen-induced ∆R1). The
relationship observed between oxygen-induced ∆R2* and oxygen-induced
∆R1 was weak and was not described fully by the open L-shaped model predicted
by the literature (24,27). No relationship was observed between native R2* and
oxygen-induced ∆R1.Recognition that tumors are biologically heterogeneous suggests a need for an
alternative investigative approach. We used OE MRI and DCE MRI to derive the
biomarker perfused Oxy-R, which provides a hypoxic signature in tumor voxels (21). We then observed that the perfused Oxy-Rtumor subregions had faster native R2* and greater negative ∆R2*
after oxygen inhalation, as hypothesized, in both mousexenograft tumors and in
human RCCs.This study emphasizes the substantial limitation of the use of summary value
biomarkers to quantify tumor pathophysiologic features, such as hypoxia, that
exhibit pronounced spatial variation (38).
The data explain why R2*-based biomarkers may be insensitive indicators of
hypoxia for some tumors. In this scenario, significant volumes of normoxic tissue
and nonperfused tissue (collectively accounting for the vast majority of tumor
tissue in most cancers) will mask the ability of native R2* and oxygen-induced
∆R2* to detect hypoxia. Indeed, over the last 2 decades, several studies
(39–41) reported that hypoxic tumor tissue had faster native
R2* and a greater negative ∆R2* after challenge with hyperoxic gas,
whereas contrary findings (42) were reported
elsewhere.This study highlights the benefits of performing parallel preclinical and clinical
experiments when evaluating translational potential of biomarkers, as recommended in
the Cancer Research UK and European Organization for Research and Treatment of
Cancer imaging biomarker roadmap (36).
Preclinical studies allow rapid and early biologic validation, but have differences
in data acquisition and analysis that could limit the ability of preclinical data to
address clinical questions; (for example, the field dependence of R2* imaging
results in a 22-fold higher effect at 7.0-T compared with 1.5-T). Despite this
potential confound, the relationships between R2* and R1 biomarkers were
equivalent in mice and humans: Voxels identified as having a hypoxic signature at
combined OE MRI and DCE MRI (perfused Oxy-R voxels) had significantly faster native
R2* and significantly greater oxygen-induced ∆R2* compared with
voxels in tumor subregions with differing pathophysiology.Further, the relative fraction of normoxic, hypoxic, and nonperfused tumor, defined
by combined OE MRI and DCE MRI, was equivalent in mice and humans, indicating that
the 786–0-R tumors were an appropriate model of heterogeneous hypoxia in
clinical RCC tumors. Finally, exploratory analysis showed that two tumors with
approximately 30% hypoxia measured by MRI had significantly higher
GLUT1 expression than the tumors with less than 10% hypoxia
measured by MRI, providing evidence of equivalent imaging-pathology relationships in
mice and humantumors.Some study limitations should be recognized. First, although the findings of a
xenograft study have been replicated in humans, the clinical sample size was small.
Second, the one-way analysis of variance for voxel-level analysis does consider the
clustering of voxels within the tumor. Third, voxel-wise data were pooled to perform
the analyses on a cohort-level basis. Finally, whereas many results at the
whole-tumor level were nonsignificant, this must be interpreted in light of the
small sample sizes and consequent limited power.In summary, these data use intrinsic susceptibility imaging and immunohistochemistry
analysis to cross validate perfused Oxy-R as a regional biomarker of tumor hypoxia
in mice and humans, providing strong rationale for further clinical translation of
the biomarker. Further studies are required to test if the same relationships are
observed between imaging and pathologic analysis and R1-based imaging and
R2*-based imaging biomarkers in other tumor types, and to evaluate the value of
perfused Oxy-R as a biomarker of prognosis, prediction of treatment response, and
detection of response to therapy.
Summary
Intrinsic susceptibility imaging and immunohistochemistry analysis were used
to validate a combined end point of oxygen enhancement plus MR-derived
perfusion as a biomarker of tumor hypoxia in mouse and patient studies.■ Oxygen-enhanced MRI is a feasible method to identify and map
tumor hypoxia in patients.■ Oxygen-enhanced MRI identifies spatial heterogeneity in
tumor hypoxia, which may identify response to therapy and aid
personalized radiation therapy treatment planning.
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: James L Tatum; Gary J Kelloff; Robert J Gillies; Jeffrey M Arbeit; J Martin Brown; K S Clifford Chao; J Donald Chapman; William C Eckelman; Anthony W Fyles; Amato J Giaccia; Richard P Hill; Cameron J Koch; Murali Cherukuri Krishna; Kenneth A Krohn; Jason S Lewis; Ralph P Mason; Giovanni Melillo; Anwar R Padhani; Garth Powis; Joseph G Rajendran; Richard Reba; Simon P Robinson; Gregg L Semenza; Harold M Swartz; Peter Vaupel; David Yang; Barbara Croft; John Hoffman; Guoying Liu; Helen Stone; Daniel Sullivan Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Inna V Linnik; Marietta L J Scott; Katherine F Holliday; Neil Woodhouse; John C Waterton; James P B O'Connor; Hervé Barjat; Carsten Liess; Jose Ulloa; Helen Young; Caroline Dive; Cassandra L Hodgkinson; Tim Ward; Darren Roberts; Samantha J Mills; Gerard Thompson; Giovanni A Buonaccorsi; Susan Cheung; Alan Jackson; Josephine H Naish; Geoff J M Parker Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Roy Vergis; Catherine M Corbishley; Andrew R Norman; Jaclyn Bartlett; Sameer Jhavar; Michael Borre; Sara Heeboll; Alan Horwich; Robert Huddart; Vincent Khoo; Ros Eeles; Colin Cooper; Matthew Sydes; David Dearnaley; Chris Parker Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Jessica K R Boult; Yann Jamin; Muhammad Babur; Katherine G Finegan; Kaye J Williams; Ross A Little; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Andrew R Reynolds; John C Waterton; Simon P Robinson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stefanie J Hectors; Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Gwenaël Pagé; Bernard E Van Beers; John C Waterton; Octavia Bane Journal: Methods Mol Biol Date: 2021
Authors: Donghan M Yang; Tatsuya J Arai; James W Campbell; Jenifer L Gerberich; Heling Zhou; Ralph P Mason Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Tatsuya J Arai; Donghan M Yang; James W Campbell; Tsuicheng Chiu; Xinyi Cheng; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Peter Peschke; Ralph P Mason Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Thanh-Trang Cao-Pham; An Tran-Ly-Binh; Arne Heyerick; Catherine Fillée; Nicolas Joudiou; Bernard Gallez; Bénédicte F Jordan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Lauren C J Baker; Arti Sikka; Jonathan M Price; Jessica K R Boult; Elise Y Lepicard; Gary Box; Yann Jamin; Terry J Spinks; Gabriela Kramer-Marek; Martin O Leach; Suzanne A Eccles; Carol Box; Simon P Robinson Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 6.244