Literature DB >> 33775857

Oxygen-Sensitive MRI: A Predictive Imaging Biomarker for Tumor Radiation Response?

Tatsuya J Arai1, Donghan M Yang1, James W Campbell1, Tsuicheng Chiu2, Xinyi Cheng2, Strahinja Stojadinovic2, Peter Peschke3, Ralph P Mason4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a noninvasive prognostic imaging biomarker related to hypoxia to predict SABR tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 145 subcutaneous syngeneic Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 rat tumors were focally irradiated once using cone beam computed tomography guidance on a small animal irradiator at 225 kV. Various doses in the range of 0 to 100 Gy were administered, while rats breathed air or oxygen, and tumor control was assessed up to 200 days. Oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1-weighted, ΔR1, ΔR2*) was applied to 79 of these tumors at 4.7 T to assess response to an oxygen gas breathing challenge on the day before irradiation as a probe of tumor hypoxia.
RESULTS: Increasing radiation dose in the range of 0 to 90 Gy enhanced tumor control of air-breathing rats with a TCD50 estimated at 59.6 ± 1.5 Gy. Control was significantly improved at some doses when rats breathed oxygen during irradiation (eg, 40 Gy; P < .05), and overall there was a modest left shift in the control curve: TCD50(oxygen) = 53.1 ± 3.1 Gy (P < .05 vs air). Oxygen-sensitive MRI showed variable response to oxygen gas breathing challenge; the magnitude of T1-weighted signal response (%ΔSI) allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy. Tumors showing %ΔSI >0.922 with O2-gas breathing challenge showed significantly better control at 40 Gy during irradiation while breathing oxygen (75% vs 0%, P < .01). In addition, increased radiation dose (50 Gy) substantially overcame resistance, with 50% control for poorly oxygenated tumors. Stratification of dose-response curves based on %ΔSI >0.922 revealed different survival curves, with TCD50 = 36.2 ± 3.2 Gy for tumors responsive to oxygen gas breathing challenge; this was significantly less than the 54.7 ± 2.4 Gy for unresponsive tumors (P < .005), irrespective of the gas inhaled during tumor irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen-sensitive MRI allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy, indicating its use as a potential predictive imaging biomarker. Increasing dose to 50 Gy overcame radiation resistance attributable to hypoxia in 50% of tumors.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33775857      PMCID: PMC8286313          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   8.013


  53 in total

Review 1.  Manipulation of tumor oxygenation and radiosensitivity through modification of cell respiration. A critical review of approaches and imaging biomarkers for therapeutic guidance.

Authors:  Bernard Gallez; Marie-Aline Neveu; Pierre Danhier; Bénédicte F Jordan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.991

2.  MR assessment of changes of tumor in response to hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

Authors:  Ken-ichiro Matsumoto; Marcelino Bernardo; Sankaran Subramanian; Peter Choyke; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna; Martin J Lizak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  O2 -sensitive MRI distinguishes brain tumor versus radiation necrosis in murine models.

Authors:  Scott C Beeman; Ying-Bo Shui; Carlos J Perez-Torres; John A Engelbach; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Dosimetric characterization of an image-guided stereotactic small animal irradiator.

Authors:  R Pidikiti; S Stojadinovic; M Speiser; K H Song; F Hager; D Saha; T D Solberg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Hypoxic prostate/muscle PO2 ratio predicts for outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term results.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Mark K Buyyounouski; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Richard E Greenberg; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  The tumor radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: are more than the 5 Rs involved?

Authors:  J Martin Brown; David J Carlson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Carbon ion radiotherapy decreases the impact of tumor heterogeneity on radiation response in experimental prostate tumors.

Authors:  Christin Glowa; Christian P Karger; Stephan Brons; Dawen Zhao; Ralph P Mason; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Peter Peschke
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  High Single Doses of Radiation May Induce Elevated Levels of Hypoxia in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

Authors:  Olivia J Kelada; Roy H Decker; Sameer K Nath; Kimberly L Johung; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Yiyun Huang; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson; Uwe Oelfke; David J Carlson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Review of Experience of a Multicenter Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Study.

Authors:  D W Nathan Kim; Christopher Straka; L Chinsoo Cho; Robert D Timmerman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Strategy of Using Intratreatment Hypoxia Imaging to Selectively and Safely Guide Radiation Dose De-escalation Concurrent With Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nancy Lee; Heiko Schoder; Brad Beattie; Ryan Lanning; Nadeem Riaz; Sean McBride; Nora Katabi; Duan Li; Brett Yarusi; Susie Chan; Lindsey Mitrani; Zhigang Zhang; David G Pfister; Eric Sherman; Shrujal Baxi; Jay Boyle; Luc G T Morris; Ian Ganly; Richard Wong; John Humm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community.

Authors:  Rosie J Goodburn; Marielle E P Philippens; Thierry L Lefebvre; Aly Khalifa; Tom Bruijnen; Joshua N Freedman; David E J Waddington; Eyesha Younus; Eric Aliotta; Gabriele Meliadò; Teo Stanescu; Wajiha Bano; Ali Fatemi-Ardekani; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Nico van den Berg; Ralph P Mason; Petra J van Houdt; James M Balter; Oliver J Gurney-Champion
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Noninvasive optoacoustic microangiography reveals dose and size dependency of radiation-induced deep tumor vasculature remodeling.

Authors:  Anna Orlova; Ksenia Pavlova; Aleksey Kurnikov; Anna Maslennikova; Marina Myagcheva; Evgeniy Zakharov; Dmitry Skamnitskiy; Valeria Perekatova; Alexander Khilov; Andrey Kovalchuk; Alexander Moiseev; Ilya Turchin; Daniel Razansky; Pavel Subochev
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  The Potential of Photoacoustic Imaging in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Thierry L Lefebvre; Emma Brown; Lina Hacker; Thomas Else; Mariam-Eleni Oraiopoulou; Michal R Tomaszewski; Rajesh Jena; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.