Literature DB >> 17118889

Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy.

James L Tatum1, Gary J Kelloff, Robert J Gillies, Jeffrey M Arbeit, J Martin Brown, K S Clifford Chao, J Donald Chapman, William C Eckelman, Anthony W Fyles, Amato J Giaccia, Richard P Hill, Cameron J Koch, Murali Cherukuri Krishna, Kenneth A Krohn, Jason S Lewis, Ralph P Mason, Giovanni Melillo, Anwar R Padhani, Garth Powis, Joseph G Rajendran, Richard Reba, Simon P Robinson, Gregg L Semenza, Harold M Swartz, Peter Vaupel, David Yang, Barbara Croft, John Hoffman, Guoying Liu, Helen Stone, Daniel Sullivan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Cancer Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute convened a workshop to assess the current status of hypoxia imaging, to assess what is known about the biology of hypoxia as it relates to cancer and cancer therapy, and to define clinical scenarios in which in vivo hypoxia imaging could prove valuable.
RESULTS: Hypoxia, or low oxygenation, has emerged as an important factor in tumor biology and response to cancer treatment. It has been correlated with angiogenesis, tumor aggressiveness, local recurrence, and metastasis, and it appears to be a prognostic factor for several cancers, including those of the cervix, head and neck, prostate, pancreas, and brain. The relationship between tumor oxygenation and response to radiation therapy has been well established, but hypoxia also affects and is affected by some chemotherapeutic agents. Although hypoxia is an important aspect of tumor physiology and response to treatment, the lack of simple and efficient methods to measure and image oxygenation hampers further understanding and limits their prognostic usefulness. There is no gold standard for measuring hypoxia; Eppendorf measurement of pO(2) has been used, but this method is invasive. Recent studies have focused on molecular markers of hypoxia, such as hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and carbonic anhydrase isozyme IX (CA-IX), and on developing noninvasive imaging techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: This workshop yielded recommendations on using hypoxia measurement to identify patients who would respond best to radiation therapy, which would improve treatment planning. This represents a narrow focus, as hypoxia measurement might also prove useful in drug development and in increasing our understanding of tumor biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118889     DOI: 10.1080/09553000601002324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  246 in total

1.  Is T2* enough to assess oxygenation? Quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent analysis in brain tumor.

Authors:  Thomas Christen; Benjamin Lemasson; Nicolas Pannetier; Regine Farion; Chantal Remy; Greg Zaharchuk; Emmanuel L Barbier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Optimization strategies for evaluation of brain hemodynamic parameters with qBOLD technique.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Wang; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  In vivo observation of intracellular oximetry in perfluorocarbon-labeled glioma cells and chemotherapeutic response in the CNS using fluorine-19 MRI.

Authors:  Deepak K K Kadayakkara; Jelena M Janjic; Lisa K Pusateri; Won-Bin Young; Eric T Ahrens
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Phase contrast MRI is an early marker of micrometastatic breast cancer development in the rat brain.

Authors:  Matthew D Budde; Eric Gold; E Kay Jordan; Melissa Smith-Brown; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging in precision radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Bainbridge; Ahmed Salem; Rob H N Tijssen; Michael Dubec; Andreas Wetscherek; Corinne Van Es; Jose Belderbos; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Fiona McDonald
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours-implications for treatment response.

Authors:  S R McKeown
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  GdDO3NI, a nitroimidazole-based T1 MRI contrast agent for imaging tumor hypoxia in vivo.

Authors:  Praveen K Gulaka; Federico Rojas-Quijano; Zoltan Kovacs; Ralph P Mason; A Dean Sherry; Vikram D Kodibagkar
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 8.  The clinical utility of imaging methods used to measure hypoxia in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Waller; Benjamin Onderdonk; Ann Flood; Harold Swartz; Jaffer Shah; Asghar Shah; Bulent Aydogan; Howard Halpern; Yasmin Hasan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Mapping Tumor Hypoxia In Vivo Using Pattern Recognition of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Data.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Kris Huang; Kiri Sandler; Hyungjoon Cho; Sean Carlin; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher; Ellen Ackerstaff
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Imaging tumour hypoxia with oxygen-enhanced MRI and BOLD MRI.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Simon P Robinson; John C Waterton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.