Literature DB >> 29868972

A global perspective on vasoactive agents in shock.

Djillali Annane1, Lamia Ouanes-Besbes2, Daniel de Backer3, Bin DU4, Anthony C Gordon5, Glenn Hernández6, Keith M Olsen7, Tiffany M Osborn8, Sandra Peake9,10, James A Russell11, Sergio Zanotti Cavazzoni12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We set out to summarize the current knowledge on vasoactive drugs and their use in the management of shock to inform physicians' practices.
METHODS: This is a narrative review by a multidisciplinary, multinational-from six continents-panel of experts including physicians, a pharmacist, trialists, and scientists. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Vasoactive drugs are an essential part of shock management. Catecholamines are the most commonly used vasoactive agents in the intensive care unit, and among them norepinephrine is the first-line therapy in most clinical conditions. Inotropes are indicated when myocardial function is depressed and dobutamine remains the first-line therapy. Vasoactive drugs have a narrow therapeutic spectrum and expose the patients to potentially lethal complications. Thus, these agents require precise therapeutic targets, close monitoring with titration to the minimal efficacious dose and should be weaned as promptly as possible. Moreover, the use of vasoactive drugs in shock requires an individualized approach. Vasopressin and possibly angiotensin II may be useful owing to their norepinephrine-sparing effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenergic agonists; Cardiovascular system; Clinical trials; Practice guidelines; Shock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29868972     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5242-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  114 in total

1.  Short-term effects of phenylephrine on systemic and regional hemodynamics in patients with septic shock: a crossover pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Morelli; Matthias Lange; Christian Ertmer; Martin Dünser; Sebastian Rehberg; Alessandra Bachetoni; Marladomenica D'Alessandro; Hugo Van Aken; Fabio Guarracino; Paolo Pietropaoli; Daniel L Traber; Martin Westphal
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Palak Shah; Jennifer A Cowger
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Shaman Jhanji; Sarah Stirling; Nakul Patel; Charles J Hinds; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Philippe Vignon; Alain Renault; Pierre-Edouard Bollaert; Claire Charpentier; Claude Martin; Gilles Troché; Jean-Damien Ricard; Gérard Nitenberg; Laurent Papazian; Elie Azoulay; Eric Bellissant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of norepinephrine on mean systemic pressure and venous return in human septic shock.

Authors:  Romain Persichini; Serena Silva; Jean-Louis Teboul; Mathieu Jozwiak; Denis Chemla; Christian Richard; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Early use of vasopressors after injury: caution before constriction.

Authors:  Jason L Sperry; Joseph P Minei; Heidi L Frankel; Micheal A West; Brian G Harbrecht; Ernest E Moore; Ronald V Maier; Ram Nirula
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  Bench-to-bedside review: Beta-adrenergic modulation in sepsis.

Authors:  Etienne de Montmollin; Jerome Aboab; Arnaud Mansart; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  A Selective V(1A) Receptor Agonist, Selepressin, Is Superior to Arginine Vasopressin and to Norepinephrine in Ovine Septic Shock.

Authors:  Xinrong He; Fuhong Su; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Régent Laporte; Anne Louise Kjølbye; Jing Zhang; Keliang Xie; Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa; Torsten Michael Reinheimer; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Jeffrey Lipman; Flavia Machado; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Marlies Ostermann; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Norepinephrine in septic shock.

Authors:  Glenn Hernández; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  The influence of heart failure on the pharmacokinetics of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Arduino A Mangoni; Elzbieta A Jarmuzewska
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.

Authors:  James A Russell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [58-year-old male with sepsis after perforation of a sigmoid colon diverticulum : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 44].

Authors:  C Dumps; V Umrath
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  A new photoplethysmographic device for continuous assessment of urethral mucosa perfusion: evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Martina Cardinali; Mathieu Magnin; Jeanne-Marie Bonnet-Garin; Christian Paquet; Jean-Yves Ayoub; Bernard Allaouchiche; Stephane Junot
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Vasopressin in septic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Myura Nagendran; James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Stephen J Brett; Gavin D Perkins; Ludhmila Hajjar; Alexina J Mason; Deborah Ashby; Anthony C Gordon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Eduardo Kattan; Djillali Annane; Ricardo Castro; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Arnaldo Dubin; Laura Evans; Michelle Ng Gong; Olfa Hamzaoui; Can Ince; Bruno Levy; Xavier Monnet; Gustavo A Ospina Tascón; Marlies Ostermann; Michael R Pinsky; James A Russell; Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent; Fernando G Zampieri; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  [Pharmacological therapy of circulatory shock].

Authors:  Reimer Riessen; Rubi Stephani Hellwege
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 10.  Adverse cardiac effects of cancer therapies: cardiotoxicity and arrhythmia.

Authors:  Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.