Literature DB >> 22926333

Effects of norepinephrine on mean systemic pressure and venous return in human septic shock.

Romain Persichini1, Serena Silva, Jean-Louis Teboul, Mathieu Jozwiak, Denis Chemla, Christian Richard, Xavier Monnet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Norepinephrine exerts venoconstriction that could increase both the mean systemic pressure and the resistance to venous return, but this has not yet been investigated in human septic shock. We examined the relative importance of both effects and the resulting effect on venous return when decreasing the dose of norepinephrine.
SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Sixteen septic shock patients. MEASUREMENTS: For estimating the venous return curve, we constructed the regression line between the pairs of cardiac index (pulse contour analysis) and central venous pressure values. These values were measured during 15-sec end-inspiratory and end-expiratory ventilatory occlusions performed at two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure, in view of widening the range of cardiac index:central venous pressure measurements and increasing the accuracy of the regression line. The x-axis intercept of the regression line was used to estimate the mean systemic pressure and the inverse of the slope of the regression line to quantify resistance to venous return. These measurements were obtained before and after decreasing the dose of norepinephrine. Passive leg raising was performed before and after decreasing the dose of norepinephrine. MAIN
RESULTS: Decreasing the dose of norepinephrine from 0.30 (0.10-1.40) to 0.19 (0.08-1.15) µg/kg/min decreased the mean systemic pressure from 33 ± 12 mm Hg to 26 ± 10 mm Hg (p = .0003). The slope of the multipoint cardiac index:central venous pressure relationship increased (p = .02). The resistance to venous return decreased, i.e., 1/slope decreased. Simultaneously, cardiac index decreased from 3.47 ± 0.86 L/min/m2 to 3.28 ± 0.76 L/min/m (p = .04), indicating a decrease in venous return. Passive leg raising increased cardiac index to a larger extent after (8% ± 4%) than before (1% ± 4%) decreasing norepinephrine (p = .001), suggesting an increase in unstressed blood volume at the lowest dose of norepinephrine.
CONCLUSIONS: In septic shock patients, decreasing the dose of norepinephrine decreased the mean systemic pressure and, to a lesser extent, the resistance to venous return. As a result, venous return decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926333     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318260c6c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  51 in total

1.  Mean systemic pressure: we can now estimate it, but for what?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Predicting the determinants of volume responsiveness.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Personalized physiology-guided resuscitation in highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest-the PERSEUS resuscitation protocol.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Eleni Arnaoutoglou; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  A global perspective on vasoactive agents in shock.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Daniel de Backer; Bin DU; Anthony C Gordon; Glenn Hernández; Keith M Olsen; Tiffany M Osborn; Sandra Peake; James A Russell; Sergio Zanotti Cavazzoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Boosting systemic pressure with phenylephrine: arterial or venous modulation?

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Steffen Rex; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Understanding venous return.

Authors:  David A Berlin; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Weaning-induced cardiac dysfunction: where are we today?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation.

Authors:  Hollmann D Aya; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 10.  The surviving sepsis campaign: fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy research priorities in adult patients.

Authors:  Ishaq Lat; Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.