Literature DB >> 29864437

Randomized Trial of Partial Gland Ablation with Vascular Targeted Phototherapy versus Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer: Extended Followup and Analyses of Effectiveness.

Inderbir S Gill1, Abdel-Rahmene Azzouzi2, Mark Emberton3, Jonathan A Coleman4, Emmanuel Coeytaux5, Avigdor Scherz6, Peter T Scardino7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prospective PCM301 trial randomized 413 men with low risk prostate cancer to partial gland ablation with vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in 207 and active surveillance in 206. Two-year outcomes were reported previously. We report 4-year rates of intervention with radical therapy and further assess efficacy with biopsy results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate biopsies were mandated at 12 and 24 months. Thereafter patients were monitored for radical therapy with periodic biopsies performed according to the standard of care at each institution. Ablation efficacy was assessed by biopsy results overall and in field in the treated lobe or the lobe with index cancer.
RESULTS: Conversion to radical therapy was less likely in the ablation cohort than in the surveillance cohort, including 7% vs 32% at 2 years, 15% vs 44% at 3 years and 24% vs 53% at 4 years (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.46). Radical therapy triggers were similar in the 2 arms. Cancer progression rates overall and by grade were significantly lower in the ablation cohort (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.59). End of study biopsy results were negative throughout the prostate in 50% of patients after ablation vs 14% after surveillance (risk difference 36%, 95% CI 28-44). Gleason 7 or higher cancer was less likely for ablation than for surveillance (16% vs 41%). Of the in field biopsies 10% contained Gleason 7 cancer after ablation vs 34% after surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial of partial ablation of low risk prostate cancer photodynamic therapy significantly reduced the subsequent finding of higher grade cancer on biopsy. Consequently fewer cases were converted to radical therapy, a clinically meaningful benefit that lowered treatment related morbidity.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neoplasm grading; phototherapy; prostatic neoplasms; risk; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29864437      PMCID: PMC6786489          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Novel water-soluble bacteriochlorophyll derivatives for vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy: synthesis, solubility, phototoxicity and the effect of serum proteins.

Authors:  Alexander Brandis; Ohad Mazor; Eran Neumark; Varda Rosenbach-Belkin; Yoram Salomon; Avigdor Scherz
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Determination of optimal drug dose and light dose index to achieve minimally invasive focal ablation of localised prostate cancer using WST11-vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Abel-Rahmene Azzouzi; Eric Barret; Arnauld Villers; Gordon H Muir; Neil J Barber; Simon Bott; John Trachtenberg; Nimalan Arumainayagam; Bertrand Gaillac; Clare Allen; Avigdor Schertz; Mark Emberton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Conditional probability of reclassification in an active surveillance program for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ridwan Alam; H Ballentine Carter; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; Mufaddal Mamawala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek J Rosario; Edward Rowe; David E Neal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience.

Authors:  Hima Bindu Musunuru; Toshihiro Yamamoto; Laurence Klotz; Gabriella Ghanem; Alexandre Mamedov; Peraka Sethukavalan; Vibhuti Jethava; Suneil Jain; Liying Zhang; Danny Vesprini; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Mufaddal Mamawala; Jonathan I Epstein; Patricia Landis; Sacha Wolf; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Erik Holmberg; Ali Khatami; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Final Results of a Phase I/II Multicenter Trial of WST11 Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy for Hemi-Ablation of the Prostate in Men with Unilateral Low Risk Prostate Cancer Performed in the United States.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja; James Bennett; Jonathan Coleman; Robert Grubb; Gerald Andriole; Robert E Reiter; Leonard Marks; Abdel-Rahmene Azzouzi; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  [Focal therapy for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Making a case "for" focal therapy of the prostate in intermediate risk prostate cancer: current perspective and ongoing trials.

Authors:  Alex Z Wang; Amir H Lebastchi; Luke P O'Connor; Michael Ahdoot; Sherif Mehralivand; Nitin Yerram; Samir S Taneja; Arvin K George; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; John F Ward; Pilar Laguna; Jean de la Rosette; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.

Authors:  Michael Ahdoot; Amir H Lebastchi; Baris Turkbey; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Investigation on Optical and Biological Properties of 2-(4-Dimethylaminophenyl)benzothiazole Based Cycloplatinated Complexes.

Authors:  Rebeca Lara; Gonzalo Millán; M Teresa Moreno; Elena Lalinde; Elvira Alfaro-Arnedo; Icíar P López; Ignacio M Larráyoz; José G Pichel
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.020

Review 5.  Focal prostate cancer therapy in the era of multiparametric MRI: a review of options and outcomes.

Authors:  John R Heard; Aurash Naser-Tavakolian; Michael Nazmifar; Michael Ahdoot
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 6.  German S3 Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: The First Evidence-Based Guidelines on Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Andreas Blana; Dirk Böhmer; Hannes Cash; Udo Ehrmann; Tobias Franiel; Thomas-Oliver Henkel; Stefan Höcht; Glen Kristiansen; Stefan Machtens; Peter Niehoff; Tobias Penzkofer; Michael Pinkawa; Jan Philipp Radtke; Wilfried Roth; Ullrich Witzsch; Roman Ganzer; Heinz Peter Schlemmer; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Oliver W Hakenberg; Martin Schostak
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 7.  Photodynamic Therapy and the Biophysics of the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Aaron J Sorrin; Mustafa Kemal Ruhi; Nathaniel A Ferlic; Vida Karimnia; William J Polacheck; Jonathan P Celli; Huang-Chiao Huang; Imran Rizvi
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.421

8.  Hemigland Cryoablation of Localized Low, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes at 5 Years.

Authors:  Masakatsu Oishi; Inderbir S Gill; Alessandro Tafuri; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Atsuko Iwata; Akbar Ashrafi; Daniel Park; Jie Cai; Mihir Desai; Osamu Ukimura; Duke K Bahn; Andre Luis Abreu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 7.600

9.  Nucleus-Targeted Organoiridium-Albumin Conjugate for Photodynamic Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Pingyu Zhang; Huaiyi Huang; Samya Banerjee; Guy J Clarkson; Chen Ge; Cinzia Imberti; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 10.  Erectile function after focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fallara; Paolo Capogrosso; Paolo Maggio; Alessandro Taborelli; Francesco Montorsi; Federico Dehò; Andrea Salonia
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.