| Literature DB >> 30734839 |
Abstract
Focal therapy (FT) should have the same oncological efficacy as whole gland therapy with fewer side effects. Precise diagnosis with PI-RADS v2 standard multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fusion or template biopsy is a basic prerequisite. Numerous ablation technologies and treatment strategies have been developed, including hemiablation. Treatment success is still inconsistently defined. The only large randomized study available compares one of the procedures to standard therapy. Therefore, even in 2019, FT must still be regarded as experimental and should only be carried out within the context of studies. Follow-up should correspond to active surveillance (AS), including MRI and fusion biopsy. Advantages and disadvantages of each ablation technique should be taken into consideration as well as the suitability of certain regions in the gland. Ideally, an individualized "à la carte" selection of various procedures should be offered. FT is well suited for patients with highly localized cancers at intermediate risk if standard therapies or AS is not possible or has been refused.Entities:
Keywords: Fusion biopsy; MRI; Partial gland ablation; Prostate cancer; Therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30734839 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-019-0862-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urologe A ISSN: 0340-2592 Impact factor: 0.639