BACKGROUND: : Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) represent a rapidly emerging technology that is being used to improve health-care delivery. In home hospice, informal caregivers play an essential role in attending to the day-to-day needs of their terminally ill loved ones. Using mHealth apps by caregivers in this setting could potentially improve the support provided to both patients and caregivers at the end of life (EoL). OBJECTIVES: : To explore informal caregivers' receptivity and concerns in using mHealth apps along with app features, caregivers perceived to be most useful in home hospice care. DESIGN: : Eighty semistructured phone interviews were conducted with informal caregivers who received care from a nonprofit hospice organization. Study data were analyzed using content analysis, coding for themes of receptivity and interest. RESULTS: : Sixty-two (78%) participants were receptive to using an mHealth app in home hospice care. Informal caregivers were interested in features that addressed: (1) communication to improve patient care (n = 44, 70%), (2) access to patient care information (n = 30, 48%), (3) education (n = 24, 39%), and (4) updates from health-care personnel and scheduling services (n = 10, 16%). CONCLUSIONS: : A substantial majority of informal caregivers voiced receptivity to using mHealth apps and expressed interest in features that enhance communication and provide information to improve patient care. Although more research is needed to examine how to incorporate this technology into existing home hospice care, our study suggests that informal caregivers are likely to use this technology they feel will help enhance home-based EoL care delivery.
BACKGROUND: : Mobile health applications (mHealth apps) represent a rapidly emerging technology that is being used to improve health-care delivery. In home hospice, informal caregivers play an essential role in attending to the day-to-day needs of their terminally ill loved ones. Using mHealth apps by caregivers in this setting could potentially improve the support provided to both patients and caregivers at the end of life (EoL). OBJECTIVES: : To explore informal caregivers' receptivity and concerns in using mHealth apps along with app features, caregivers perceived to be most useful in home hospice care. DESIGN: : Eighty semistructured phone interviews were conducted with informal caregivers who received care from a nonprofit hospice organization. Study data were analyzed using content analysis, coding for themes of receptivity and interest. RESULTS: : Sixty-two (78%) participants were receptive to using an mHealth app in home hospice care. Informal caregivers were interested in features that addressed: (1) communication to improve patient care (n = 44, 70%), (2) access to patient care information (n = 30, 48%), (3) education (n = 24, 39%), and (4) updates from health-care personnel and scheduling services (n = 10, 16%). CONCLUSIONS: : A substantial majority of informal caregivers voiced receptivity to using mHealth apps and expressed interest in features that enhance communication and provide information to improve patient care. Although more research is needed to examine how to incorporate this technology into existing home hospice care, our study suggests that informal caregivers are likely to use this technology they feel will help enhance home-based EoL care delivery.
Entities:
Keywords:
caregiving; end of life; hospice; mHealth; technology; telemedicine
Authors: Kathryn McCall; Jeremy Keen; Keith Farrer; Roma Maguire; Lisa McCann; Bridget Johnston; Maria McGill; Meurig Sage; Nora Kearney Journal: Int J Palliat Nurs Date: 2008-09
Authors: Malene S Davis; Krista L Harrison; James F Rice; Alanna Logan; Barry Hess; Perry G Fine; J Cameron Muir Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Sara J Czaja; David Loewenstein; Richard Schulz; Sankaran N Nair; Dolores Perdomo Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Ramona L Rhodes; Susan L Mitchell; Susan C Miller; Stephen R Connor; Joan M Teno Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Adam Darkins; Patricia Ryan; Rita Kobb; Linda Foster; Ellen Edmonson; Bonnie Wakefield; Anne E Lancaster Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Ariel Shalev; Veerawat Phongtankuel; M Carrington Reid; Sara J Czaja; Ritchell Dignam; Rosemary Baughn; Matthew Newmark; Holly G Prigerson; Jeanne Teresi; Ronald D Adelman Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Jennifer Dickman Portz; Kelsey Ford; David B Bekelman; Rebecca S Boxer; Jean S Kutner; Sara Czaja; Kira Elsbernd; Sheana Bull Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Chariklia Tziraki; Corrina Grimes; Filipa Ventura; Rónán O'Caoimh; Silvina Santana; Veronica Zavagli; Silvia Varani; Donatella Tramontano; João Apóstolo; Bart Geurden; Vincenzo De Luca; Giovanni Tramontano; Maria Rosaria Romano; Marilena Anastasaki; Christos Lionis; Rafael Rodríguez-Acuña; Manuel Luis Capelas; Tânia Dos Santos Afonso; David William Molloy; Giuseppe Liotta; Guido Iaccarino; Maria Triassi; Patrik Eklund; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger; Maddalena Illario Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 1.458