Literature DB >> 26644527

Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ethan Basch1, Allison M Deal2, Mark G Kris2, Howard I Scher2, Clifford A Hudis2, Paul Sabbatini2, Lauren Rogak2, Antonia V Bennett2, Amylou C Dueck2, Thomas M Atkinson2, Joanne F Chou2, Dorothy Dulko2, Laura Sit2, Allison Barz2, Paul Novotny2, Michael Fruscione2, Jeff A Sloan2, Deborah Schrag2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is growing interest to enhance symptom monitoring during routine cancer care using patient-reported outcomes, but evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is limited.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients receiving routine outpatient chemotherapy for advanced solid tumors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to report 12 common symptoms via tablet computers or to receive usual care consisting of symptom monitoring at the discretion of clinicians. Those with home computers received weekly e-mail prompts to report between visits. Treating physicians received symptom printouts at visits, and nurses received e-mail alerts when participants reported severe or worsening symptoms. The primary outcome was change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 6 months compared with baseline, measured by the EuroQol EQ-5D Index. Secondary endpoints included emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and survival.
RESULTS: Among 766 patients allocated, HRQL improved among more participants in the intervention group than usual care (34% v 18%) and worsened among fewer (38% v 53%; P < .001). Overall, mean HRQL declined by less in the intervention group than usual care (1.4- v 7.1-point drop; P < .001). Patients receiving intervention were less frequently admitted to the ER (34% v 41%; P = .02) or hospitalized (45% v 49%; P = .08) and remained on chemotherapy longer (mean, 8.2 v 6.3 months; P = .002). Although 75% of the intervention group was alive at 1 year, 69% with usual care survived the year (P = .05), with differences also seen in quality-adjusted survival (mean of 8.7 v. 8.0 months; P = .004). Benefits were greater for participants lacking prior computer experience. Most patients receiving intervention (63%) reported severe symptoms during the study. Nurses frequently initiated clinical actions in response to e-mail alerts.
CONCLUSION: Clinical benefits were associated with symptom self-reporting during cancer care.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26644527      PMCID: PMC4872028          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Quality improvement in cancer symptom assessment and control: the Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP).

Authors:  Julie E Gilbert; Doris Howell; Susan King; Carol Sawka; Erin Hughes; Helen Angus; Deborah Dudgeon
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Brent A Blumenstein; Barbara Halpenny; Seth Wolpin; Jesse R Fann; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Bryant T Karras; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Roxanne E Jensen; Ethan Basch
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Reliability of adverse symptom event reporting by clinicians.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Yuelin Li; Charles W Coffey; Laura Sit; Mary Shaw; Dawn Lavene; Antonia V Bennett; Mike Fruscione; Lauren Rogak; Jennifer Hay; Mithat Gönen; Deborah Schrag; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Prospective, observational study of pain and analgesic prescribing in medical oncology outpatients with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Fisch; Ju-Whei Lee; Matthias Weiss; Lynne I Wagner; Victor T Chang; David Cella; Judith B Manola; Lori M Minasian; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Symptoms tell it all: a systematic review of the value of symptom assessment to predict survival in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Marija Trajkovic-Vidakovic; Alexander de Graeff; Emile E Voest; Saskia C C M Teunissen
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 8.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Jonathan Sussman; Lorraine Martelli-Reid; Greg Pond; Daryl Bainbridge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Debbie Travers; Annah Wyss; Ashley Leak; Anna Waller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  588 in total

1.  Characteristics of Participation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Data Capture Components of NRG Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephanie L Pugh; Joseph P Rodgers; Katherine A Yeager; Ronald C Chen; Benjamin Movsas; Roseann Bonanni; James Dignam; Deborah W Bruner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Pilot randomized trial of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention for hospitalized patients with cancer.

Authors:  R D Nipp; A El-Jawahri; M Ruddy; C Fuh; B Temel; S M D'Arpino; B J Cashavelly; V A Jackson; D P Ryan; E P Hochberg; J A Greer; J S Temel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Body Image Disturbance in Surgically Treated Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Patient-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Mark A Ellis; Katherine R Sterba; Terry A Day; Courtney H Marsh; Stacy Maurer; Elizabeth G Hill; Evan M Graboyes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Factors affecting symptom presentation in an early-phase clinical trials clinic patient population.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Tito R Mendoza; Eucharia C Iwuanyanwu; Meryna Manandhar; Solmaz F Afshar; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Apostolia Tsimberidou; Aung Naing; Charles S Cleeland; David S Hong
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Fostering Innovation in Symptom Management among Hemodialysis Patients: Paths Forward for Insomnia, Muscle Cramps, and Fatigue.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Tandrea Hilliard; Elena Lumby; Graciela Castillo; Jazmine Orazi; Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Amy Barton Pai; Matthew Bertrand Rivara; Wendy L St Peter; Steven Darrow Weisbord; Caroline M Wilkie; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  InSight Care Pilot Program: Redefining Seeing a Patient.

Authors:  Bobby Daly; Gilad Kuperman; Alice Zervoudakis; Abigail Baldwin Medsker; Ankita Roy; Alice S Ro; Javiera Arenas; Hrudaya Veena Yanamandala; Raj Kottamasu; Rori Salvaggio; Jessie Holland; Stephanie Hirsch; Chasity B Walters; Tara Lauria; Kim Chow; Aaron Begue; Margarita Rozenshteyn; Melissa Zablocki; Amandeep K Dhami; Nicholas Silva; Emily Brown; Lauren L Katzen; Yeneat O Chiu; Claire Perry; Stefania Sokolowski; Isaac Wagner; Stephen R Veach; Rachel N Grisham; Chau T Dang; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Brett A Simon; Wendy Perchick
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 7.  Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care.

Authors:  David Hui; Breffni L Hannon; Camilla Zimmermann; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Augusta Silveira; Eurico Monteiro; Teresa Sequeira
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 9.  Capturing and Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Trials: Practical Considerations for Clinicians.

Authors:  Juliana Perez Botero; Gita Thanarajasingam; Rahma Warsame
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Patient-reported outcomes collected in ambulatory oncology practices: Feasibility, patterns, and correlates.

Authors:  Christopher R Friese; Alex J Fauer; Clare Kuisell; Kari Mendelsohn-Victor; Nathan C Wright; Jennifer J Griggs; Milisa Manojlovich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.