Literature DB >> 16620167

Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare.

Stanley M Finkelstein1, Stuart M Speedie, Sandra Potthoff.   

Abstract

Patient outcomes and cost were compared when home healthcare was delivered by telemedicine or by traditional means for patients receiving skilled nursing care at home. A randomized controlled trial was established using three groups. The first group, control group C, received traditional skilled nursing care at home. The second group, video intervention group V, received traditional skilled nursing care at home and virtual visits using videoconferencing technology. The third group, monitoring intervention group M, received traditional skilled nursing care at home, virtual visits using videoconferencing technology, and physiologic monitoring for their underlying chronic condition. Discharge to a higher level of care (hospital, nursing home) within 6 months of study participation was 42% for C subjects, 21% for V subjects, and 15% for M subjects. There was no difference in mortality between the groups. Morbidity, as evaluated by changes in the knowledge, behavior and status scales of the Omaha Assessment Tool, showed no differences between groups except for increased scores for activities of daily living at study discharge in the V and M groups. The average visit costs were $48.27 for face-to-face home visits, $22.11 for average virtual visits (video group), and $32.06 and $38.62 for average monitoring group visits for congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects, respectively. This study has demonstrated that virtual visits between a skilled home healthcare nurse and chronically ill patients at home can improve patient outcome at lower cost than traditional skilled face-to-face home healthcare visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16620167     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  48 in total

Review 1.  Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Anke Lenferink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Paul Dlpm van der Valk; Peter A Frith; Marlies Zwerink; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Job van der Palen; Tanja W Effing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Older adults' and case managers' initial impressions of community-based telehealth kiosks.

Authors:  Karen L Courtney; Jennifer H Lingler; Laurel Person Mecca; Laurie A Garlock; Richard Schulz; Andrew W Dick; Ellen Olshansky
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.571

3.  A pilot study to engage and counsel HIV-positive African American youth via telehealth technology.

Authors:  Parya Saberi; Patrick Yuan; Malcolm John; Nicolas Sheon; Mallory O Johnson
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 4.  A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Stephanie Vergara Rojas; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Older adults' perceptions of home telehealth services.

Authors:  Miha Cimperman; Maja Makovec Brenčič; Peter Trkman; Mateja de Leonni Stanonik
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Privacy by design in personal health monitoring.

Authors:  Anders Nordgren
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2015-06

7.  Immigrants' Use of eHealth Services in the United States, National Health Interview Survey, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Yang Wang; D Phuong Do; Fernando A Wilson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  A randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the Tele-ERA study.

Authors:  Paul Y Takahashi; Gregory J Hanson; Jennifer L Pecina; Robert J Stroebel; Rajeev Chaudhry; Nilay D Shah; James M Naessens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication.

Authors:  Victoria A Wade; Jonathan Karnon; Adam G Elshaug; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Trine S Bergmo
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2009-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.