| Literature DB >> 36059850 |
Isabel Byrne1, Estee Cramer2, Luca Nelli3, Francois Rerolle4,5, Lindsey Wu1, Catriona Patterson1, Jason Rosado6,7, Elin Dumont1, Kevin K A Tetteh1, Emily Dantzer4, Bouasy Hongvanthong8, Kimberley M Fornace3, Gillian Stresman1, Andrew Lover2, Adam Bennett4,5, Chris Drakeley1.
Abstract
The epidemiology of malaria changes as prevalence falls in low-transmission settings, with remaining infections becoming more difficult to detect and diagnose. At this stage active surveillance is critical to detect residual hotspots of transmission. However, diagnostic tools used in active surveillance generally only detect concurrent infections, and surveys may benefit from sensitive tools such as serological assays. Serology can be used to interrogate and characterize individuals' previous exposure to malaria over longer durations, providing information essential to the detection of remaining foci of infection. We ran blood samples collected from a 2016 population-based survey in the low-transmission setting of northern Lao PDR on a multiplexed bead assay to characterize historic and recent exposures to Plasmodium falciparum and vivax. Using geostatistical methods and remote-sensing data we assessed the environmental and spatial associations with exposure, and created predictive maps of exposure within the study sites. We additionally linked the active surveillance PCR and serology data with passively collected surveillance data from health facility records. We aimed to highlight the added information which can be gained from serology as a tool in active surveillance surveys in low-transmission settings, and to identify priority areas for national surveillance programmes where malaria risk is higher. We also discuss the issues faced when linking malaria data from multiple sources using multiple diagnostic endpoints.Entities:
Keywords: active surveillance; elimination; geostatistics; malaria; passive surveillance; serology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059850 PMCID: PMC9433740 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.929366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Map of Northern Lao PDR with active surveillance study households and districts of the study.
Table of malaria antigens used to define P. falciparum and P. vivax exposures, broken down by Plasmodium species. Including Plasmodb ID and reference source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PfAMA1 | Apical membrane antigen 1 | Historic | PF3D7_1133400 | ( |
|
| PfMSP1_19 | Merozoite surface protein 1-19 | Historic | PF3D7_0930300 | ( |
|
| Etramp 5 Ag 1 | Early transcribed membrane protein 5 antigen (exon) 1 | Recent | PF3D7_0532100 | ( |
|
| PvMSP119 | Merozoite surface protein 1-19 | Historic | PVX_099980 | ( |
|
| PvAMA1 | Apical membrane antigen 1 | Historic | PVX_092275 | ( |
|
| PvEBPII | Recent | PVX_110810 | ( |
Numbers of positive cases by species confirmed by RDT and microscopy from passive surveillance (health center) 2016 records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khua | Buamaphan | 5 | 60 | 1 | 2 |
| Khua | Lardsang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Khua | Nayang | 3 | 37 | 0 | 2 |
| Khua | Vikocmueng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nambak | Khunolum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nambak | Makpouk | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Nambak | Muengteng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nambak | Numnga | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Nambak | Numthuan | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Et | Naphieng | 0 | 118 | 0 | 0 |
| Et | Xiengkhoun | 3 | 13 | 11 | 19 |
| Paktha | Hardsa | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Paktha | Houisat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paktha | Jiengtong | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Paktha | Kengphak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paktha | Kiewlom | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Paktha | Konteum | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Age range and gender breakdown of participants in active survey.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 2,380 | 46.8 (45.7–48.0%) |
| Female | 2,702 | 53.2 (52.0–54.3%) |
| Age Group | ||
| <5 | 273 | 5.4 (4.6–6.3%) |
| 5–15 | 1,198 | 23.6 (21.9–25.3%) |
| > 15 | 3,611 | 71.0 (73.0–76.1%) |
Numbers of individuals and households tested in active surveillance survey per district, with number positive for P. vivax and P. falciparum by PCR and serology (with prevalence in brackets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paktha | 983 | 357 | 308 (0.31) | 88 (0.09) | 52 (0.05) | 21 (0.02) | 3 (0.003) | 2 (0.002) | 0 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) |
| Khua and Nambak | 2,393 | 683 | 470 (0.2) | 46 (0.02) | 46 (0.02) | 24 (0.01) | 17 (0.007) | 3 (0.001) | 0 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) |
| Et | 1,418 | 362 | 289 (0.2) | 52 (0.04) | 19 (0.01) | 10 (0.00) | 3 (0.002) | 3 (0.002) | 0 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) |
+ve = positive.
Figure 2Panel of age stratified seroprevalence graphs for (A) historic exposure to P. falciparum, (B) recent exposure to P. falciparum, (C) historic exposure to P. vivax, and (D) recent exposure to P. vivax. This represents the full active survey population (n = 5,084).
Figure 3Panel of geostatistical maps of predicted seroprevalences and exceedance probabilities to historic and recent P. vivax and P. falciparum exposure for each district. Exceedance probabilities are on the bottom row of each district panel and refer to the probability of a location having >20% predicted prevalence for P. vivax exposures, and >5% for P. falciparum exposures.
Figure 4Active and passive survey diagnostic results aggregated to catchment level. Gray background represents full district area used for geostatistical predictions in Figure 3. Sample numbers for active surveillance are number of samples from active survey. Sample numbers for passive surveillance are the 2016 population within health facility catchments which was used to calculate cases per capita.