Literature DB >> 29854188

Improving Quality of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology.

Thusitha Mabotuwana1,2, Christopher S Hall1,2, Joel Tieder2, Martin L Gunn1.   

Abstract

Failure of timely follow-up imaging recommendations can result in suboptimal patient care. Evidence suggests that the use of conditional language in follow-up recommendations is associated with changes to follow-up compliance. Assuming that referring physicians prefer explicit guidance for follow-up recommendations, we develop algorithms to extract recommended modality and interval from follow-up imaging recommendations related to lung, thyroid and adrenal findings. Using a production dataset of 417,451 radiology reports, we observed that on average, follow-up interval was not mentioned in 79.4% of reports, and modality was missing in 47.4% of reports (4,819 reports contained a follow-up imaging recommendation for one of the three findings). We also developed an interactive dashboard to be used to monitor compliance rates. Recognizing the importance of increasing precision of follow-up recommendations, a quality improvement pilot study is underway with the goal of achieving a target where follow-up modality and interval are both explicitly specified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29854188      PMCID: PMC5977608     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  12 in total

1.  Automatic identification of critical follow-up recommendation sentences in radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Development of automated detection of radiology reports citing adrenal findings.

Authors:  Jason J Zopf; Jessica M Langer; William W Boonn; Woojin Kim; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible Cancer.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Darco Lalevic; Caroline Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Detection of Cardiac Incidental Findings on Routine Chest CT: The Impact of Dedicated Training in Cardiac Imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Verdini; Ashley M Lee; Anand M Prabhakar; Suhny Abbara; Brian Ghoshhajra
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Incidental imaging findings from routine chest CT used to identify subjects at high risk of future cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Pushpa M Jairam; Martijn J A Gondrie; Diederick E Grobbee; Willem P Th M Mali; Peter C A Jacobs; Yolanda van der Graaf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne L Callen; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings.

Authors:  Sayon Dutta; William J Long; David F M Brown; Andrew T Reisner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Correlation of the Strength of Recommendations for Additional Imaging to Adherence Rate and Diagnostic Yield.

Authors:  H Benjamin Harvey; Carol C Wu; Matthew D Gilman; Vartan Vartanians; Elkan F Halpern; Pari V Pandharipande; Joanne O Shepard; Tarik K Alkasab
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  "Chasing a Ghost": Factors that Influence Primary Care Physicians to Follow Up on Incidental Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Eva K Bugos; Curtis P Langlotz; Rosemary Frasso
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations.

Authors:  Christopher L Sistrom; Keith J Dreyer; Pragya P Dang; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Giles W Boland; Daniel I Rosenthal; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.

Authors:  Arlene Casey; Emma Davidson; Michael Poon; Hang Dong; Daniel Duma; Andreas Grivas; Claire Grover; Víctor Suárez-Paniagua; Richard Tobin; William Whiteley; Honghan Wu; Beatrice Alex
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.