Literature DB >> 24865309

Incidental imaging findings from routine chest CT used to identify subjects at high risk of future cardiovascular events.

Pushpa M Jairam1, Martijn J A Gondrie, Diederick E Grobbee, Willem P Th M Mali, Peter C A Jacobs, Yolanda van der Graaf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of incidental findings at chest computed tomography (CT) in the detection of subjects at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by deriving and validating a CT-based prediction rule.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the ethical review board of the primary participating facility, and informed consent was waived. The derivation cohort comprised 10 410 patients who underwent diagnostic chest CT for noncardiovascular indications. During a mean follow-up of 3.7 years (maximum, 7.0 years), 1148 CVD events (cases) were identified. By using a case-cohort approach, CT scans from the cases and from an approximately 10% random sample of the baseline cohort (n = 1366) were graded visually for several cardiovascular findings. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with backward elimination technique was used to derive the best-fitting parsimonious prediction model. External validation (discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification) was performed in a separate validation cohort (n = 1653).
RESULTS: The final model included patient age and sex, CT indication, left anterior descending coronary artery calcifications, mitral valve calcifications, descending aorta calcifications, and cardiac diameter. The model demonstrated good discriminative value, with a C statistic of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68, 0.74) and a good overall calibration, as assessed in the validation cohort. This imaging-based model allows accurate stratification of individuals into clinically relevant risk categories.
CONCLUSION: Structured reporting of incidental CT findings can mediate accurate stratification of individuals into clinically relevant risk categories and subsequently allow those at higher risk of future CVD events to be distinguished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865309     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Under-reporting of cardiovascular findings on chest CT.

Authors:  Nicola Sverzellati; Teresa Arcadi; Luca Salvolini; Roberto Dore; Maurizio Zompatori; Manuela Mereu; Giuseppe Battista; Ilenia Martella; Francesco Toni; Luciano Cardinale; Erica Maffei; Fabio Maggi; Filippo Cademartiri; Tommaso Pirronti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Improving Quality of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Joel Tieder; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  [Vers une stratégie de prise en charge complète des détections fortuites en imagerie].

Authors:  Scott J Adams; Paul S Babyn; Alanna Danilkewich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Toward a comprehensive management strategy for incidental findings in imaging.

Authors:  Scott J Adams; Paul S Babyn; Alanna Danilkewich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  A default normal chest CT structured reporting field for coronary calcifications does not cause excessive false-negative reporting.

Authors:  William R Walter; Shlomit Goldberg-Stein; Jeffrey M Levsky; Hillel W Cohen; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Coronary artery calcification is common on nongated chest computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Revathi Balakrishnan; Brian Nguyen; Roy Raad; Robert Donnino; David P Naidich; Jill E Jacobs; Harmony R Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  High pitch third generation dual-source CT: Coronary and cardiac visualization on routine chest CT.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Mark A Ahlman; Elizabeth C Jones; Mariana Selwaness; Marcus Y Chen; Les R Folio; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-04-20

8.  Deep Learning-Quantified Calcium Scores for Automatic Cardiovascular Mortality Prediction at Lung Screening Low-Dose CT.

Authors:  Bob D de Vos; Nikolas Lessmann; Pim A de Jong; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-04-15

9.  Prognostic value of heart valve calcifications for cardiovascular events in a lung cancer screening population.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Richard A P Takx; Ivana Išgum; Harry J de Koning; Matthijs Oudkerk; Willem P Th M Mali; Ricardo P J Budde; Tim Leiner; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cardiovascular disease prediction: do pulmonary disease-related chest CT features have added value?

Authors:  Pushpa M Jairam; Pim A de Jong; Willem P Th M Mali; Ivana Isgum; Yolanda van der Graaf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.