Literature DB >> 27192458

"Chasing a Ghost": Factors that Influence Primary Care Physicians to Follow Up on Incidental Imaging Findings.

Hanna M Zafar1, Eva K Bugos1, Curtis P Langlotz1, Rosemary Frasso1.   

Abstract

Purpose To explore provider and patient characteristics that influence how primary care providers (PCPs) communicate and manage incidental imaging findings. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. Through semistructured interviews, researchers explored concerns and perspectives of 30 PCPs on receiving and acting on incidental imaging findings. Open-ended questions were designed to elicit a range of responses rather than quantifiable data. Thematic codes were developed and explicitly defined. Three research assistants independently coded all 30 deidentified transcripts and resolved discrepancies (κ = 0.85). Codes pertaining to PCP and patient characteristics were organized into an explanatory model. Results Some PCPs felt compelled but frustrated to pursue costly follow-up for incidental imaging findings of limited clinical importance. Other PCPs did not act on findings that were unfamiliar or occurred in an unusual clinical context when follow-up recommendations were not given; the challenges of researching the clinical importance of these findings or seeking specialist consultation led to inaction. Some PCPs reported using a uniform approach to communicate and manage incidental findings, while others adapted their approach to the patient and the finding. Sometimes PCP characteristics such as follow-up style superseded patient characteristics. At other times patient characteristics such as health literacy superseded PCP characteristics. Conclusion PCPs cited a variety of objective and subjective factors that influence how they communicate and manage incidental imaging findings. These results suggest that some patients may receive inappropriate follow-up of incidental imaging findings and present an opportunity for radiologists to help PCPs and patients to best use the information conveyed in imaging reports. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27192458      PMCID: PMC5084970          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  Geographic variation in Medicare drug spending.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Katherine Baicker; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Followup imaging after urological imaging studies: comparison of radiologist recommendation and urologist practice.

Authors:  Jane S Cho; Pat Fulgham; Angela Clark; Louis Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement.

Authors:  Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; J William Charboneau; Edmund S Cibas; Orlo H Clark; Beverly G Coleman; John J Cronan; Peter M Doubilet; Douglas B Evans; John R Goellner; Ian D Hay; Barbara S Hertzberg; Charles M Intenzo; R Brooke Jeffrey; Jill E Langer; P Reed Larsen; Susan J Mandel; William D Middleton; Carl C Reading; Steven I Sherman; Franklin N Tessler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Kasey S Buckles; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings.

Authors:  Sunit Sebastian; Cyrillo Araujo; Jeffrey D Neitlich; Lincoln L Berland
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  Cascade effects of medical technology.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee.

Authors:  Lincoln L Berland; Stuart G Silverman; Richard M Gore; William W Mayo-Smith; Alec J Megibow; Judy Yee; James A Brink; Mark E Baker; Michael P Federle; W Dennis Foley; Isaac R Francis; Brian R Herts; Gary M Israel; Glenn Krinsky; Joel F Platt; William P Shuman; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Incidental adnexal masses detected at low-dose unenhanced CT in asymptomatic women age 50 and older: implications for clinical management and ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Meghan E Hanson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

1.  Why Do Physicians Pursue Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings? A National Survey.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Carrie H Colla; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  [Incidental findings : Evaluation, management recommendations and legal considerations].

Authors:  P Mildenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Improving Quality of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Joel Tieder; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  A Just Standard: The Ethical Management of Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research.

Authors:  Mackenzie Graham; Nina Hallowell; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Improving Incidental Finding Documentation in Trauma Patients Amidst Poor Access to Follow-up Care.

Authors:  Marguerite W Spruce; Jessica A Bowman; Alice J Wilson; Joseph M Galante
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Racial disparities in provider-patient communication of incidental medical findings.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schut
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Integrated imaging and molecular analysis to decipher tumor microenvironment in the era of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Aaron T Mayer; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 17.012

8.  Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Claire Lupo; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02

Review 9.  Incidental Non-cardiac Findings in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Mark T Macmillan; Michelle C Williams
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-10-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.