Literature DB >> 22042494

Development of automated detection of radiology reports citing adrenal findings.

Jason J Zopf1, Jessica M Langer, William W Boonn, Woojin Kim, Hanna M Zafar.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of automated detection of adrenal nodules, a common finding on CT, using a newly developed search engine that mines dictated radiology reports. To ensure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, we utilized a preexisting de-identified database of 32,974 CT reports from February 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010. Common adrenal descriptors from 29 staff radiologists were used to develop an automated rule-based algorithm targeting adrenal findings. Each sentence within the free text of reports was searched with an adapted NegEx negation algorithm. The algorithm was refined using a 2-week test period of reports and subsequently validated using a 6-week period. Manual review of the 3,693 CT reports in the validation period identified 222 positive reports while the algorithm detected 238 positive reports. The algorithm identified one true positive report missed on manual review for a total of 223 true positive reports. This resulted in a precision of 91% (217 of 238) and a recall of 97% (217 of 223). The sensitivity of the query was 97.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 93.9-98.9%), and the specificity was 99.3% (95% CI, 99.1-99.6%). The positive predictive value of the algorithm was 91.0% (95% CI, 86.6-94.3%), and the negative predictive value was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.6-99.9%). The prevalence of true positive adrenal findings identified by the query (7.1%) was nearly identical to the true prevalence (7.2%). Automated detection of language describing common findings in imaging reports, such as adrenal nodules on CT, is feasible.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22042494      PMCID: PMC3264732          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9425-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  21 in total

1.  Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology.

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries.

Authors:  W W Chapman; W Bridewell; P Hanbury; G F Cooper; B G Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports.

Authors:  Yang Huang; Henry J Lowe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  The adrenal incidentaloma: guidelines for evaluation and recommendations for management.

Authors:  D J Graham; C R McHenry
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  On the prevalence of adrenocortical adenomas in an autopsy material in relation to hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  H Hedeland; G Ostberg; B Hökfelt
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1968-09

Review 6.  Natural language processing and the representation of clinical data.

Authors:  N Sager; M Lyman; C Bucknall; N Nhan; L J Tick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Adrenal hemorrhage: a 25-year experience at the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  A Vella; T B Nippoldt; J C Morris
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma").

Authors:  Melvin M Grumbach; Beverly M K Biller; Glenn D Braunstein; Karen K Campbell; J Aidan Carney; Paul A Godley; Emily L Harris; Joseph K T Lee; Yolanda C Oertel; Mitchell C Posner; Janet A Schlechte; H Samuel Wieand
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; C Friedman; P O Alderson; W DuMouchel; S B Johnson; P D Clayton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Incidentally discovered adrenal masses.

Authors:  R T Kloos; M D Gross; I R Francis; M Korobkin; B Shapiro
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 19.871

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving Quality of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology.

Authors:  Thusitha Mabotuwana; Christopher S Hall; Joel Tieder; Martin L Gunn
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 2.  Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Seyedmostafa Sheikhalishahi; Riccardo Miotto; Joel T Dudley; Alberto Lavelli; Fabio Rinaldi; Venet Osmani
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-04-27

3.  Event-Based Clinical Finding Extraction from Radiology Reports with Pre-trained Language Model.

Authors:  Wilson Lau; Kevin Lybarger; Martin L Gunn; Meliha Yetisgen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Qing Liu; Chao Han; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.