| Literature DB >> 29849006 |
Mohamed Elgendi1,2,3, Parmod Kumar4, Skye Barbic5, Newton Howard6, Derek Abbott7,8, Andrzej Cichocki9,10,11.
Abstract
The influence of subliminal priming (behavior outside of awareness) in humans is an interesting phenomenon and its understanding is crucial as it can impact behavior, choices, and actions. Given this, research about the impact of priming continues to be an area of investigative interest, and this paper provides a technical overview of research design strengths and issues in subliminal priming research. Efficient experiments and protocols, as well as associated electroencephalographic and eye movement data analyses, are discussed in detail. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different priming experiments that have measured affective (emotional) and cognitive responses. Finally, very recent approaches and findings are described to summarize and emphasize state-of-the-art methods and potential future directions in research marketing and other commercial applications.Entities:
Keywords: advertisement; affective priming; event-related brain potentials; marketing; persuasion; social psychology; subliminal perception; subliminal priming
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849006 PMCID: PMC6027235 DOI: 10.3390/bs8060054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-328X
Figure 1An illustration of supraliminal vs. subliminal priming. In subliminal priming, subjects are not aware of the stimuli as it occurs quickly (approximately less than 500 ms), yet it still influences them.
Figure 2An example of a typical subliminal priming trial. The arrow depicts the flow of time. The priming process shows how exposure to one stimulus (e.g., audio, video, words, or images associated with a negative, neutral, or positive emotion) influences the response to the target, which is another stimulus. The symbols #### represent forward and backward masks. Masking is a widely used and powerful way of studying visual processes to reduce (or eliminate) any influence from previous or upcoming primes.
Figure 3The impact of subliminal priming on ERP. The topographic maps [10] confirm the results of overall priming effects (i.e., ERPs with primed pictures minus ERPs with unprimed pictures): (A) 100–250 ms at the frontal lobe and (B) 500–700 ms at the parietal lobe. There is a significant difference between primed and unprimed ERPs within the 100–250 ms duration at the frontal lobe.
Priming design parameters in different contexts.
| TYPE OF PRIMING | EXPOSURE/ RESPONSE TIMES | STIMULI TYPES | REF. |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| In word-naming experiments, participants began each trial by pressing the space bar on a keyboard placed in front of them. A blank interval of 250 ms followed the disappearance of the default display. The prime display then appeared and remained on the screen until the onset of the participant’s naming response. The prime display contained a single subliminal prime with exposure times of 33–200 ms. Longer prime exposure times allowed participants to identity the prime. | An overwhelming amount of priming research has used visual stimuli, but audio priming using human voices and artificial sounds has also been reported. Twelve high-frequency nouns served as target and distractor words on the prime and probe displays. The following words were used in several experiments: “BOARD”, “FLUTE”, “TABLE”, “PILOT”, “CLOUD”, “QUEEN”, “TIGER”, “GUEST”, “GLASS”, “PRIZE”, “BAKER”, and “CLERK”. | [ |
|
| The trials began by fixating a participant’s attention to the default display. In one study [ | Primes can be the names of the pictures, the pictures themselves, or the names of the categories to which a picture might belong. Standard categories were provided in a previous study [ | [ |
|
| Three prime durations were tested (i.e., 100 ms, 250 ms, and 500 ms). The prime was immediately followed by the onset of a stimulus at the same location on the screen as that of the prime. | Both the target and prime are word stimuli, including two types of primes: Semantic but non-associative (e.g., dolphin and whale), Associative but non-semantic (e.g., spider web). | [ |
|
| The exposure times for primes ranged from 42 to 56 ms (with an average of 47 ms), individually adjusted to each object based on pilot experiments. | The objects can be simple line drawings of tools, furniture, animals, clothes, vehicles, and other items, typically drawn with black, 2-pixel-wide lines on a white background. | [ |
|
| The intervals of prime exposure and stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) lasted 17‒100 ms. | Simple objects, like left and right arrows, can serve as prime and mask stimuli. Other examples include common shapes, such as squares, rectangles, hearts, and diamonds. | [ |
|
| Perceptual: The subjects pressed a mouse button to start each trial. A fixation dot was presented for 500 ms, followed by either a 50- or 100-ms display of the object picture. The picture was followed by a 500-ms mask: a randomly appearing arrangement of straight and curved lines. Word association: Each trial began with the display of a cue word, and participants were asked to respond with the first word that came to mind. Category example: Participants were presented with a category name and asked to respond with the first member of that category that came to mind. | Perceptual: Simple line drawings of common objects may be used (e.g., plants or animals with basic names). The stimulus should consist of at least one pair with similar names but different shapes (e.g., a grand piano and an upright piano). | [ |
|
| A 3-s odor pulse was released, during which participants viewed a black screen. | Visual stimuli: neutral faces were used in the experiment. Out of the 18 female faces, nine were white/Caucasian, five were East Asian, and four were Afro-Caribbean. Out of the 18 male faces, 12 were white/Caucasian, five were afro-Caribbean and one was East Asian. | [ |
Figure 4An example of event-related potentials. N400 or N4 wave refers to the negative deflection peaking around 400 ms after the stimulus. Note that the negative peak is above zero and the positive peak is below zero as averaging across multiple trials cancels out random variations [77].
Comparisons between event-related potential (ERP) studies based on components, stimuli, and locations. All ERP components consist of two components: type of polarity, and number of milliseconds after the onset of the stimulus. For example, a positive-going peak, which is the first measurable peak in the ERP waveform (occurring about 100 ms after the stimulus onset), is called P100 or P1.
| Component | Stimulus | Summary | Location | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mood adjectives (32 stimuli over 6 presentations). Subjects = 17. Duration: subliminal = 1 ms, supraliminal = 40 ms. | The study demonstrated that ERPs are sensitive to affective valences, whether consciously or unconsciously. | F3, F4, P3, P4, Cz, Pz, Oz | [ |
|
| Images of happy or fearful and surprised facial expressions (n = 140). Subjects = 17. Duration: primes (fearful or happy) = 30 ms, targets (surprised) = 800 ms. | Larger occipital P1 components were found with fearful rather than happy expressions. | A source analysis implicated the bilateral extrastriate cortex. | [ |
|
| Threatening and neutral words were used as primes for groups with high and low social anxiety. The targets were images of neutral and angry facial expressions (n = 16). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 200 ms, targets = 500 ms. | The high social anxiety group showed attention bias after viewing the neutral primes but not the threatening primes, indicating suppression of the attention bias. The low social anxiety group demonstrated opposite effects. | O1/O2 | [ |
|
| Go/no-go task with subliminal primes (14 blocks of 72 arrow shapes; trials = 1008). Subjects = 21. Duration: primes = 16 ms, targets = 100 ms. | Inhibition-related ERPs were modulated as a function of prime congruency. The inhibition of impending motor responses can be initiated by unconscious stimuli. | The primes influenced frontal inhibitory control mechanisms. | [ |
|
| Earthquake-(un)related words (12 of each category). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 17 ms, targets = 1500 ms. | More positive ERP deflections in related words than unrelated words. | P2: Posterior cingulate cortex; P300: parahippocampal gyrus | [ |
|
| Names of acquaintances in a lie detection protocol (5 known names, 4 unknown names). Subjects = 14. Duration: primes = 17 ms, targets = 150 ms. | Subliminal primes modulate ERPs when the task involves lying. | Fz, Cz, Pz, Oz | [ |
|
| Logic-based learning paradigms (3 magic squares of odd order). Subjects = 46. Duration: primes = 33.33 ms, targets = unknown. | Subliminal “cues” increased learner performances. | Not stated | [ |
|
| Repeated images preceded by masked image primes (n = 80). Subjects = 16. Duration: primes = 50 ms, targets = 300 ms. | Reduced amplitudes in N/P190 that may reflect early processing of object-specific representations. Changes in N400 reflect more domain-general sematic processing. | Posterior/anterior (locations not specified) | [ |
|
| Animal names in streams of words with masked primes (numbers unknown). Subjects = 24. Duration: primes = 40 ms, targets = 300 ms. | N250 reflects processing at the level of forms, while N400 reflects processing at the level of meaning. | Parietal (CP1) | [ |
|
| Concrete and abstract emotional words (720 German nouns). Subjects = 30. | Concreteness affected N400 and LPC. | FC3, FC4 | [ |
|
| Action sentences (156 Spanish sentences: 104 related to hand actions, 52 neutral sentences). | N400 distinguished between compatible and incompatible primes and was more negative for incompatible primes. | Cz | [ |
|
| Visual stimuli (3 ethnicities: white/Caucasian, East-Asian, and Afro-Caribbean) and olfactory stimuli (3 odor conditions: pleasant, unpleasant and a neutral control). Subjects = 20. Duration: primes = 3 s, targets = 300 ms. | Significant effects of odor were observed at 600 and 900 ms after face-onset | Left and right lateral frontal-temporal electrodes | [ |