Literature DB >> 10953824

Processing coordinate structures.

L Frazier1, A Munn, C Clifton.   

Abstract

Coordination often involves syntactically like categories. Based on the results of four reading time studies, it is argued here that the syntactic like-category restriction is not grammatical. Coordination of unlike categories can be just as acceptable as coordination of like categories. However, syntactically like category coordination is processed faster than coordination of unlike categories even when the two sentence types are judged to be fully acceptable. Further, parallelism of conjuncts facilitates processing regardless of whether it is parallelism in the category of the conjuncts (a property which the grammar might regulate) or parallelism in the internal structure of the conjuncts (a property which the grammar does not regulate, on anyone's view). Parallelism did not facilitate processing when the structure of a subject and object were manipulated, implying that parallelism effects are largely limited to the conjuncts of a coordinate structure and not due simply to the repetition of a phrase with a particular shape.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10953824     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005156427600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  1 in total

1.  Parallel structure: a source of facilitation in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  L Frazier; L Taft; T Roeper; C Clifton; K Ehrlich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09
  1 in total
  18 in total

1.  Processing gapped verbs.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Carlie Overfelt; Do Tromp; Frank Wijnen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-08

2.  Should given information come before new? Yes and no.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

3.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Kerry Ledoux; Matthew J Traxler; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

4.  Structural priming among prepositional phrases: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

Review 5.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Ellipsis and discourse coherence.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Linguist Philos       Date:  2006-06

8.  Zero-Adjective Contrast in Much-less Ellipsis: The Advantage for Parallel Syntax.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Jesse A Harris
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Parallelism effects and verb activation: the sustained reactivation hypothesis.

Authors:  Sarah M Callahan; Lewis P Shapiro; Tracy Love
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-04

10.  Effects of syntactic context on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Diana Bocianski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.