Literature DB >> 29845574

A Retrospective and Prospective Study to Develop a Pre-operative Difficulty Score for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Yousef Ibrahim1, Rami W Radwan2, Ali Adel Ne'ma Abdullah2, Mohamed Sherif2, Usman Khalid2, James Ansell2, Ashraf Rasheed2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to develop a grading system to enable pre-operative prediction of technical difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using retrospective data and to attempt to validate our scoring system prospectively.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of 100 consecutive patients. Pre-operative variables were collected based on a template devised by the American College of Surgeons. Outcomes were duration of surgery, conversion to open and post-operative complications. Multivariate analysis with subsequent measurement of hazard ratios was used to formulate a weighted grading system. Prospective analysis was performed of 100 consecutive patients who were scored pre-operatively. Outcomes were duration of surgery and length of stay.
RESULTS: Retrospective univariate analysis identified four variables associated with an increase in duration of surgery: male gender (p = 0.023), age (p = 0.000), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.000) and pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (p = 0.001). Prospective analysis revealed weak positive correlations between the scoring system and duration of surgery (0.34) and length of stay (0.40).
CONCLUSION: We have identified four pre-operative variables that predicted a longer duration of surgery. Preliminary results suggest a positive correlation between this scoring system and duration of surgery. An adequately powered prospective multi-centre study is needed to validate our findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic; Operative time; Preoperative care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845574     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3821-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  A new preoperative grading system for predicting the operative conditions for abdominal wall-lifting laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kenji Takegami; Naohiro Sata; Yoneei Kawaguchi; Yoshiro Kubota
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study.

Authors:  A Brodsky; I Matter; E Sabo; A Cohen; J Abrahamson; S Eldar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Three-dimensional determination of variability in colon anatomy: applications for numerical modeling of the intestine.

Authors:  Stéphane Bourgouin; Thierry Bège; Nadine Lalonde; Julien Mancini; Catherine Masson; Kathia Chaumoitre; Christian Brunet; Stéphane Victor Berdah
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  L M Brunt; M A Quasebarth; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Kologlu; M Doganay; E Reis; M Atli; M Dolapci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States.

Authors:  J E Everhart; M Khare; M Hill; K R Maurer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.

Authors:  Haytham M A Kaafarani; Tracy Schifftner Smith; Leigh Neumayer; David H Berger; Ralph G Depalma; Kamal M F Itani
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  A J Karayiannakis; A Polychronidis; S Perente; S Botaitis; C Simopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael Rosen; Fred Brody; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Szabolcs Ábrahám; Tibor Németh; Ria Benkő; Mária Matuz; Dániel Váczi; Illés Tóth; Aurél Ottlakán; László Andrási; János Tajti; Viktor Kovács; József Pieler; László Libor; Attila Paszt; Zsolt Simonka; György Lázár
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  A retrospective and prospective study to establish a preoperative difficulty predicting model for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Zixiao Wang; Yuhang Wang; Daqiang Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.