Literature DB >> 29808507

Cancer phase I trial design using drug combinations when a fraction of dose limiting toxicities is attributable to one or more agents.

Jose L Jimenez1, Mourad Tighiouart2, Mauro Gasparini1.   

Abstract

Drug combination trials are increasingly common nowadays in clinical research. However, very few methods have been developed to consider toxicity attributions in the dose escalation process. We are motivated by a trial in which the clinician is able to identify certain toxicities that can be attributed to one of the agents. We present a Bayesian adaptive design in which toxicity attributions are modeled via copula regression and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) curve is estimated as a function of model parameters. The dose escalation algorithm uses cohorts of two patients, following the continual reassessment method (CRM) scheme, where at each stage of the trial, we search for the dose of one agent given the current dose of the other agent. The performance of the design is studied by evaluating its operating characteristics when the underlying model is either correctly specified or misspecified. We show that this method can be extended to accommodate discrete dose combinations.
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attributable toxicity; cancer phase I trials; continual reassessment method; copula type models; drug combination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29808507      PMCID: PMC6261712          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   1.715


  24 in total

1.  Dose-finding with two agents in Phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Randall E Millikan; Peter Mueller; Sang-Joon Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Non-parametric optimal design in dose finding studies.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Xavier Paoletti; Jean Maccario
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Two-dimensional dose finding in discrete dose space.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  M Gasparini; J Eisele
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Continual reassessment method for partial ordering.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A Bayesian dose-finding procedure for phase I clinical trials based only on the assumption of monotonicity.

Authors:  John Whitehead; Helene Thygesen; Anne Whitehead
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A latent contingency table approach to dose finding for combinations of two agents.

Authors:  Guosheng Yin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.

Authors:  Adrian P Mander; Michael J Sweeting
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  4 in total

1.  A nonparametric Bayesian method for dose finding in drug combinations cancer trials.

Authors:  Zahra S Razaee; Galen Cook-Wiens; Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A Bayesian seamless phase I-II trial design with two stages for cancer clinical trials with drug combinations.

Authors:  José L Jiménez; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  A proposal for a new PhD level curriculum on quantitative methods for drug development.

Authors:  T Jaki; A Gordon; P Forster; L Bijnens; B Bornkamp; W Brannath; R Fontana; M Gasparini; L V Hampson; T Jacobs; B Jones; X Paoletti; M Posch; A Titman; R Vonk; F Koenig
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Dose Correlation of Panax ginseng and Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. Drug Pairs in the Chinese Medicine Prescription Based on the Copula Function.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Mingyue Zheng; Yunhui Chen; Qian He; Adeel Khoja; Mingyue Long; Jiaxin Fan; Yiwen Hao; Chaomei Fu; Peng Hu; Ke Wang; Jianhua Jiang; Xuan Zhao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.