| Literature DB >> 34484409 |
Wei Lin1, Mingyue Zheng2,3, Yunhui Chen4, Qian He5, Adeel Khoja2, Mingyue Long4, Jiaxin Fan4, Yiwen Hao6, Chaomei Fu6, Peng Hu3, Ke Wang7, Jianhua Jiang1, Xuan Zhao6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Panax ginseng and Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. (AMK) are widely used in treating various diseases; however, research is insufficient on measuring the relationship that exists by combining this drug pair using the copula function.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34484409 PMCID: PMC8410382 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9933254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The study process.
Examples of Panax ginseng and AMK databases.
| Dynasty | Prescription | Prescription source | AMK dose | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |||
| Tang | Da Dingxin Wan | Waitai Miyao | 3 Liang | 123.93 g | 1 Liang | 41.31 g |
| Tang | Bushen Fuling Wan | Waitai Miyao | 2 Liang | 82.62 g | 2 Liang | 82.62 g |
| Song | Baishiying Tang | Shengji Zonglu | 1 Fen | 0.4 g | 1 Fen | 0.4 g |
| Song | Yuanzhi San | Taipingshenghuifang | 7.5 Qian | 30 g | 7 Qian | 30 g |
| Yuan | Jiaweiqianshi Baizhu San | Danxixinfa | 0.5 Qian | 2 g | 0.5 Qian | 2 g |
| Yuan | Bazhen San | Ruizutangfang | 1 Liang | 40 g | 1 Liang | 40 g |
| Ming | Erzhi Wan | Fushoujingfang | 1 Liang | 36.9 g | 3 Liang | 110.7 g |
| Ming | Eryang Dan | Pujifang | 1 Liang | 36.9 g | 1 Liang | 36.9 g |
| Qing | Baozhen Wan | Jiyanliangfang | 1 Liang and 3 Qian | 47.97 g | 1 Liang and 5 Qian | 55.35 g |
| Qing | Huajing Dan | Bianzheng Lu | 0.5 Liang | 18.45 g | 1 Liang | 36.9 g |
Conversion principles for prescription units from each dynasty.
| Dynasty | 1 Jin (g) | 1 Liang (g) | 1 Qian (g) | 1 Fen (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tang | 661 | 41.31 | 1.721 | 0.17 |
| Song | 663 | 40 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| Song | 663 | 40 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| Yuan | 663 | 40 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| Ming | 590 | 36.9 | 3.69 | 0.37 |
| Qing | 590 | 36.9 | 3.69 | 0.37 |
Descriptive statistics of variables.
| Indications | Variables | Number of cases | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes mellitus | 110 | 20.0 (35.5) | (18.6, 28.2) | |
| AMK dose | 20.0 (31.4) | (20.8, 29.9) | ||
|
| ||||
| Insomnia | 78 | 19.2 (28.7) | (19.6, 27.3) | |
| AMK dose | 19.2 (27.9) | (19.2, 27.0) | ||
|
| ||||
| Diarrhea | 91 | 15.5 (31.3) | (17.5, 25.2) | |
| AMK dose | 30.0 (29.4) | (21.0, 29.6) | ||
Normality test.
| Indications | Kolmogorov–Smirnov | Shapiro–Wilk | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | df | Variable | df | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus |
| 0.163 | 110 | <0.001 | 0.854 | 110 | <0.001 |
| AMK | 0.138 | 110 | <0.001 | 0.909 | 110 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||||
| Insomnia |
| 0.138 | 78 | <0.001 | 0.918 | 78 | <0.001 |
| AMK | 0.154 | 78 | <0.001 | 0.918 | 78 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||||
| Diarrhea |
| 0.148 | 91 | <0.001 | 0.895 | 91 | <0.001 |
| AMK | 0.149 | 91 | <0.001 | 0.909 | 91 | <0.001 | |
Figure 2Panax ginseng and AMK kernel distribution estimations: (a) Panax ginseng (treatment for diabetes mellitus), (b) AMK (treatment for diabetes mellitus), (c) Panax ginseng (treatment for insomnia), (d) AMK (treatment for insomnia), (e) Panax ginseng (treatment for diarrhea), and (f) AMK (treatment for diarrhea).
Figure 3Histograms of the frequency distributions, Panax ginseng (u) and AMK (v): (a) diabetes mellitus, (b) insomnia, and (c) diarrhea.
Figure 4Histograms of the probability distributions, Panax ginseng (u) and AMK (v): (a) diabetes mellitus, (b) insomnia, and (c) diarrhea.
Parameter estimation of the copula function.
| Copula function | Squared Euclidean distance | Parameter estimation | Kendall correlation coefficient | Spearman correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton copula function | 0.0353 | 0.7773 | 0.9297 | |
| Frank copula function | 0.0158 | 0.7850 | 0.9421 | |
| Gumbel copula function | 0.0221 | 0.7638 | 0.9211 | |
| Gaussian copula function | 0.0821 | 0.6649 | 0.8538 | |
| 0.0090 | 0.8689 | 0.9563 |
Figure 5Joint distribution function (a) and probability density function (b) of diabetes mellitus.
The copula function parameter estimation.
| Copula function | Squared Euclidean distance | Parameter estimation | Kendall correlation coefficient | Spearman correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton copula function | 0.0247 | 0.7958 | 0.9207 | |
| Frank copula function | 0.0214 | 0.6989 | 0.9426 | |
| Gumbel copula function | 0.0276 | 0.8211 | 0.9264 | |
| Gaussian copula function | 0.0472 | 0.7723 | 0.8810 | |
| 0.0108 | 0.7858 | 0.9276 |
Figure 6Joint distribution function (a) and probability density function (b) of insomnia.
The copula function parameter estimation.
| Copula function | Squared Euclidean distance | Parameter estimation | Kendall correlation coefficient | Spearman correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton copula function | 0.0241 | 0.7442 | 0.9064 | |
| Frank copula function | 0.0153 | 0.7370 | 0.9133 | |
| Gumbel copula function | 0.0376 | 0.6938 | 0.8711 | |
| Gaussian copula function | 0.0400 | 0.6726 | 0.8602 | |
| 0.0117 | 0.7403 | 0.8958 |
Figure 7Joint distribution function (a) and probability density function (b) of diarrhea.