Literature DB >> 21361888

Continual reassessment method for partial ordering.

Nolan A Wages1, Mark R Conaway, John O'Quigley.   

Abstract

Much of the statistical methodology underlying the experimental design of phase 1 trials in oncology is intended for studies involving a single cytotoxic agent. The goal of these studies is to estimate the maximally tolerated dose, the highest dose that can be administered with an acceptable level of toxicity. A fundamental assumption of these methods is monotonicity of the dose-toxicity curve. This is a reasonable assumption for single-agent trials in which the administration of greater doses of the agent can be expected to produce dose-limiting toxicities in increasing proportions of patients. When studying multiple agents, the assumption may not hold because the ordering of the toxicity probabilities could possibly be unknown for several of the available drug combinations. At the same time, some of the orderings are known and so we describe the whole situation as that of a partial ordering. In this article, we propose a new two-dimensional dose-finding method for multiple-agent trials that simplifies to the continual reassessment method (CRM), introduced by O'Quigley, Pepe, and Fisher (1990, Biometrics 46, 33-48), when the ordering is fully known. This design enables us to relax the assumption of a monotonic dose-toxicity curve. We compare our approach and some simulation results to a CRM design in which the ordering is known as well as to other suggestions for partial orders.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361888      PMCID: PMC3141101          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  18 in total

1.  Dose-finding with two agents in Phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Randall E Millikan; Peter Mueller; Sang-Joon Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Stephanie Dunbar; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Selecting drug combinations based on total equivalent dose (dose intensity)

Authors:  R Simon; E L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel and carboplatin with oral valspodar in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  A Patnaik; E Warner; M Michael; M J Egorin; M J Moore; L L Siu; P M Fracasso; S Rivkin; I Kerr; M Litchman; A M Oza
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Using the tolerable-dose diagram in the design of phase I combination chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A latent contingency table approach to dose finding for combinations of two agents.

Authors:  Guosheng Yin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses.

Authors:  S Møller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  55 in total

1.  Isotonic designs for phase I trials in partially ordered groups.

Authors:  Mark Conaway
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Bethany Jablonski Horton; Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Design considerations for dose-expansion cohorts in phase I trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Scientific Review of Phase I Protocols With Novel Dose-Escalation Designs: How Much Information Is Needed?

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Mithat Gönen; George J Bosl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A comparative study of adaptive dose-finding designs for phase I oncology trials of combination therapies.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Nolan A Wages; Hiroyuki Sato; Shigeyuki Matsui
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Drug Combination Trials with Delayed Toxicities.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Jing Ning
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.728

8.  Dose Finding for Drug Combination in Early Cancer Phase I Trials using Conditional Continual Reassessment Method.

Authors:  Márcio Augusto Diniz; Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2017-11-27

9.  A Generalized Continual Reassessment Method for Two-Agent Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Nan Jia
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

10.  Comments on 'competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials' by M-K. Riviere, F. Dubois, S. Zohar.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.