Literature DB >> 27149544

Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.

Sophia B Hufnagel1,2,3, Lisa J Martin1,2, Amy Cassedy2,4, Robert J Hopkin1,2, Armand H Matheny Antommaria2,5.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has challenged the consensus that predictive testing should not be performed on asymptomatic minors for conditions that are not medically actionable in childhood. While the available literature suggests that most parents want access to incidental findings discovered in genomic sequencing, there is little information regarding adolescents' views. This study's goal is to determine adolescent views regarding the disclosure of incidental findings for adult onset conditions that are not medically actionable in childhood. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of students enrolled in 7-12th grade science classes in three Cincinnati public schools. Most (235 of 282, 83%) students wanted access to non-actionable incidental findings. These participants most frequently (38%) endorsed future planning as the reason for disclosure. Seventy-two percent of students believed they should participate in the decision making process. Seventy-three percent of students believed that parents of children less than 12 years old should have access to this information. Adolescents want to have access to and participate in decisions about incidental findings.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; attitudes; genetic testing; health knowledge; incidental findings; practice

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27149544     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  9 in total

Review 1.  Genomic medicine for kidney disease.

Authors:  Emily E Groopman; Hila Milo Rasouly; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Cynthia A Prows; Melissa DeJonckheere; William B Brinkman; Lisa Vaughn; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Adolescents' and Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions: Associations With Age, Race, and Sex.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Lisa J Martin; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 4.  How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review.

Authors:  Isabella A Sherburn; Keri Finlay; Stephanie Best
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 5.351

5.  Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Emily Scholtes; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 6.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

7.  Impact of Genetic Testing for Cardiomyopathy on Emotional Well-Being and Family Dynamics: A Study of Parents and Adolescents.

Authors:  Priyanka Ahimaz; Maya Sabatello; Min Qian; Aijin Wang; Erin M Miller; Ashley Parrott; Ashwin K Lal; Kathryn C Chatfield; Joseph W Rossano; Stephanie M Ware; John J Parent; Paul Kantor; Lisa Yue; Julia Wynn; Teresa M Lee; Linda J Addonizio; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2021-07-13

8.  Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents.

Authors:  Juliann M Savatt; Jennifer K Wagner; Steven Joffe; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Marc S Williams; Angela R Bradbury; F Daniel Davis; Julie Hergenrather; Yirui Hu; Melissa A Kelly; H Lester Kirchner; Michelle N Meyer; Jessica Mozersky; Sean M O'Dell; Josie Pervola; Andrea Seeley; Amy C Sturm; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Whether, when, how, and how much? General public's and cancer patients' views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findings.

Authors:  Jude Emmanuel Cléophat; Michel Dorval; Zaki El Haffaf; Jocelyne Chiquette; Stephanie Collins; Benjamin Malo; Vincent Fradet; Yann Joly; Hermann Nabi
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.