HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 are presented on the virus surface as a trimer of heterodimer and are the targets of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). We describe here the synthesis and preliminary immunological evaluation of a three-component trivalent HIV-1 V3 glycopeptide immunogen aiming to raise glycopeptide epitope-specific antibodies. Click chemistry confers efficient synthesis of the lipopeptide-glycopeptide conjugate that carries three copies of HIV-1 JR-FL gp120 V3 glycopeptide with a high-mannose glycan at the N332 glycosylation site. We found that the multivalent presentation substantially enhanced the immunogenicity of the V3 glycopeptide. The antisera induced by the three-component multivalent glycopeptide immunogen exhibited stronger binding to heterologous HIV-1 gp120s and the trimeric gp140s than that from the monovalent glycopeptide immunogen. The antisera generated from this preliminary rabbit immunization did not show virus neutralization activity, probably due to the lack of somatic maturation. The ability to elicit substantial glycopeptide epitope-specific antibodies by the three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen suggests that it could serve as a valuable vaccine component in combination with other vaccine candidates for further immunization studies.
HIV-1envelope glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 are presented on the virus surface as a trimer of heterodimer and are the targets of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). We describe here the synthesis and preliminary immunological evaluation of a three-component trivalent HIV-1 V3 glycopeptide immunogen aiming to raise glycopeptide epitope-specific antibodies. Click chemistry confers efficient synthesis of the lipopeptide-glycopeptide conjugate that carries three copies of HIV-1 JR-FL gp120 V3 glycopeptide with a high-mannose glycan at the N332 glycosylation site. We found that the multivalent presentation substantially enhanced the immunogenicity of the V3 glycopeptide. The antisera induced by the three-component multivalent glycopeptide immunogen exhibited stronger binding to heterologous HIV-1gp120s and the trimeric gp140s than that from the monovalent glycopeptide immunogen. The antisera generated from this preliminary rabbit immunization did not show virus neutralization activity, probably due to the lack of somatic maturation. The ability to elicit substantial glycopeptide epitope-specific antibodies by the three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen suggests that it could serve as a valuable vaccine component in combination with other vaccine candidates for further immunization studies.
The HIV-1envelope glycoprotein (Env)
trimer is responsible for
viral entry into host cells and is the primary target for vaccine
design.[1,2] The Env comprises three gp120 and three
gp41 subunits and is covered by a dense N-glycan coat.[3] Glycan shielding helps the virus to evade the host immune
response.[3−5] Nevertheless, the glycosylation defense is not impermeable,
as glycan-dependent broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) have been
isolated from infected individuals, which can recognize and penetrate
the glycan shield of HIV-1.[6−10] Among the most potent neutralizers of these bNAbs is the PGT121–130
group that targets and penetrates the glycan shield to recognize both
glycans and the protein surface of gp120 V3 region.[7,11,12] Structural studies have revealed that the
PGT-series bNAbs recognize the high-mannose patch centered around
the N332 high-mannoseN-glycan on V3 loop, suggesting the N332 high-mannoseN-glycan is highly accessible and vulnerable to the human immune system.[1,7,11−14] Designing appropriate HIV-1 immunogen
using the glycopeptides recognized by these bNAbs is an alternative
strategy for HIV-1 vaccine development, as the designed immunogen
may elicit similar antibody responses to target the precise structure
on Env.[13,15,16] Recently,
Haynes and co-workers mimicked this bNAb epitope using a synthetic
V3 glycopeptide.[17] The monomeric V3 glycopeptide
was formulated in the Toll-like receptor 4 agonist GLA-SE adjuvant
and administered to rhesus macaques. Glycan-dependent binding activity
was observed using isolated monoclonal antibodies. Our group has also
studied the immunogenicity of V3 glycopeptide by rational immunogen
design. We first revealed the minimal epitope of several bNAbs by
antibody–antigen binding study using synthetic V3 glycopeptides.[18] It was found that antibody PGT128 exhibited
specificity for high-mannose N-glycan with glycosylation site promiscuity;
PGT121 showed binding specificity for glycopeptide carrying a sialylated
N-glycan at N301 site, and 10-1074 was specific for glycopeptide carrying
a high-mannose N-glycan at N332 site. We further designed a three-component
glycopeptide immunogen, including a JR-FL strain 33-mer V3 glycopeptide
carrying a high-mannose glycan at N332, a T-helper epitope peptide
derived from tetanus toxoid, and a Toll-like receptor 2 ligand lipopeptide
Pam3CSK4.[19] Rabbit
immunization revealed that the synthetic self-adjuvant glycopeptide
immunogen could elicit substantial glycan-dependent antibodies with
broad recognition to several gp120s across clades. These results suggest
that the synthetic V3 glycopeptide immunogens may be a viable approach
to elicit V3-glycan-specific bNAbs. However, new immunogen design
requires further optimization to enhance the immunogenicity.HIV-1gp120/gp41 subunits are presented on the viral surface as
a trimer,[3,20] and some of the bNAbs, including the V3-glycan-specific
antibodies, preferentially or specifically recognized the native Env
trimer compared to monomeric gp120, suggesting their elicitation likely
requires the presentation of trimeric immunogens.[21,22] Indeed, our recent binding study disclosed that trivalent V3 glycopeptide
were more efficient in recapitulating the epitope of some bNAbs.[23] We designed and synthesized mono-, bi-, and
trivalent gp120 V3 glycopeptides to mimic the V3 glycopeptide domains
presented in Env trimer. Binding studies showed that 10-1074 antibody
exhibits significantly enhanced binding to the bi- and trivalent V3
glycopeptide over the monomer, suggesting that the trivalent V3 glycopeptide
could better mimic the actual epitope of bNAb 10-1074. However, design
and synthesis of multivalent antigens to mimic the Env trimer is challenging
due to the lack of structure details and the difficulties in chemical
synthesis.[5,24−26] We report here the synthesis
of a novel three-component multivalent glycopeptide immunogen including
a T-helper epitope peptide, a lipopeptide Pam3CSK4, and trivalent V3 glycopeptides, carrying high-mannose glycans at
the N332 site. To evaluate immunogenicity, the trivalent glycopeptides
were formulated into liposomes and administered to rabbits without
additional adjuvants. Compared to the previous three-component monovalent
glycopeptide immunogen, the immunogenicity of V3 glycopeptide was
significantly enhanced by multivalent presentation. Similar to the
case of the monovalent immunogen, the antisera generated from the
preliminary immunization with the trivalent glycopeptide immunogen
did not show viral neutralization activity, probably still due to
the lack of somatic maturation. Nevertheless, the antisera induced
by the three-component multivalent glycopeptide immunogen exhibited
stronger binding to both gp120s and trimeric gp140s than those raised
by our previously reported monovalent glycopeptide immunogen.[19] We also found that substantial glycopeptide
epitope-specific antibodies were elicited by the three-component multivalent
glycopeptide immunogen. Glycopeptide binding analysis indicated that
the antibodies induced by the multivalent glycopeptide immunogen preferentially
recognized the tri- and bivalent glycopeptide antigens.
Results
Synthesis of
the Three-Component Multivalent Glycopeptide Immunogen
We
focused our research on the 33-mer mini-V3 domain with a high-mannoseglycan attached at N332, which is recognized by 10-1074 and a majority
of the PGT-series bNAbs.[7,13] We previously applied
the copper(I)-catalyzed alkyne–azide 3 + 2 cycloaddition (click
chemistry) to synthesize the monovalent, three-component HIV-1 V3
glycopeptide immunogen (1), which consists of a 33-mer
V3 glycopeptide epitope, a universal T-helper epitope P30, and a lipopeptide
(Pam3CSK4) that serves as a ligand of Toll-like
receptor 2 (Scheme a).[19] The synthesis of the trivalent,
three-component HIV-1 V3 glycopeptide immunogen followed a similar
strategy (Scheme b).
Scheme 1
(a) Structure of the Three-Component Monovalent Glycopeptide Immunogen,
and (b) Synthesis of Three-Component Trivalent Glycopeptide Immunogen
First, three Fmoc-Lys(N3)–OH moieties were installed
at the C-terminus during solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), followed
by the installation of the P30 T-cell epitope FNNFTVSFWLRVPKVSASHLE
and the attachment of lipopeptide Pam3CSK4.
The 6-aminohexanoic acid residues were placed to function as a flexible
spacer. The crude peptide was cleaved from the resin by cocktail R
(trifluoroacetic acid/thioanisole/ethanedithiol/anisole = 90/5/3/2)
and then purified on a polar-CN column to afford trivalent lipopeptide
scaffold 2 in excellent yield, and the identity was confirmed
by analytical HPLC and ESI-MS analysis (Figure a). Finally, a cyclic 33-mer V3 high-mannoseglycopeptide 3 carrying an alkyne on the N-terminus,
which was previously synthesized by a chemoenzymatic method to construct
the monovalent glycopeptide immunogen,[19] was conjugated to lipopeptide scaffold 2 by the copper(I)-catalyzed
alkyne–azide 3 + 2 cycloaddition reaction to give the desired
three-component trivalent glycopeptide 4 after HPLC purification.
The structure and purity of three-component trivalent glycopeptide 4 was confirmed by analytical HPLC and ESI-MS analysis (Figure b).
Figure 1
HPLC and ESI-MS analysis
of the synthetic three-component trivalent
glycopeptide immunogen. (a) Trivalent lipopeptide scaffold 2. (b) Three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen 4. Left panel, analytical HPLC profile; right panel, the deconvoluted
ESI-MS spectra. Analytical HPLC were run on a CN column using a linear
gradient of 20–70% MeCN containing 0.1% TFA over 50 min. The
LC-ESI-MS analysis was performed on an Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass
spectrometer.
HPLC and ESI-MS analysis
of the synthetic three-component trivalent
glycopeptide immunogen. (a) Trivalent lipopeptide scaffold 2. (b) Three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen 4. Left panel, analytical HPLC profile; right panel, the deconvoluted
ESI-MS spectra. Analytical HPLC were run on a CN column using a linear
gradient of 20–70% MeCN containing 0.1% TFA over 50 min. The
LC-ESI-MS analysis was performed on an Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass
spectrometer.
Immunization
To
better mimic the Env trimer on the
HIV virus surface, we formulated the synthetic three-component trivalent
glycopeptide immunogen into liposomes following a reported procedure.[19,27] The obtained liposomes were administered to rabbits (3 per group)
at a relative low dose (50 μg of synthetic immunogen per immunization)
without additional adjuvants via subcutaneous and intramuscular injections.
After priming, three boosters were applied at intervals of 21 days.
Bleeds were taken 7 days after the last injection, and antisera were
used for immunological analysis.
Binding of Antisera to
gp120s and gp140s
We combined
the antisera from the three immunized rabbits and evaluated the binding
to gp120s from HIV-1 strains CN54, CON-S, A244, and JR-CSF, as well
as to gp140s from JR-FL and SF162 stains. In a previous study, the
antisera induced by the three-component monovalent glycopeptide immunogen 1 have shown broad binding to
the gp120s derived from some of the above strains with similar titers.[19] In the present study, the antisera induced by
the three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen 4 showed stronger binding to the CN54, CON-S, and JR-CSF gp120s
than the antisera induced by the monovalent immunogen 1 (Figure a–c),
with the observed titers being up to 4-fold higher. Interestingly,
the trivalent immunogen 4 induced also higher immune
responses toward the trimeric JR-FL and SF162 gp140s than the monovalent
immunogen 1 (Figure e,f). In contrast, the titers of the antisera from
both the mono- and trivalent immunogens (1 and 4) to the gp120 of HIV-1 A244 strain were relatively weak,
and they did not show apparent differences for the two types of immunogens
(Figure d). As shown
by the alignment of the V3 domain sequences of the HIV-1gp120s and
gp140s derived from different HIV-1 strains (Figure g), the CN54, CON-S, JR-CSF, JR-FL, and SF162
all have a conserved N332 glycosylation site, while the A244 strain
has this conserved N-glycosylation site shifted from N332 to the N334
position (Figure g).
The presence of the N332 high-mannoseglycan on the envelope glycoproteins
gp120s and gp140s of the CN54, CON-S, JR-CSF, JR-FL, and SF162 strains
was confirmed by ELISA analysis of their binding to the broadly neutralizing
antibody (bNAb) 10-1074 (Figure S1), which
specifically recognizes gp120/gp140 with a high-mannose glycan attached
at the N332 site.[12] The A244 gp120 did
not show binding to bNAb 10-1074 due to the shift of the N-glycan
from N332 to N334 (Figure S1). The synthetic
glycopeptide incorporated in the trivalent immunogen was derived from
JR-FL strain with the deletion of the highly variable tip sequence
(Figure g) to avoid
potentially strong strain-specific immune responses. The ability of
the trivalent immunogen carrying the JR-FL V3 glycopeptide sequence
to raise antibody responses that were broadly reactive to the envelope
glycoproteins gp120/gp140 suggests that the antibodies raised by this
immunogen targeted the common conserved epitopes on the envelope.
In addition, the relatively weak binding to the A244 gp120 in which
the conserved N-glycan shifted from N332 to N334 site indicated that
the antibodies raised by this glycopeptide immunogen were glycan-dependent
and preferably recognized the envelope glycoproteins carrying a conserved
N-glycan at the N332 site.
Figure 2
Comparison of the antisera binding to the envelope
glycoprotein
gp120s and gp140s derived from different HIV-1 strains. (a) HIV-1
CN54, (b) HIV-1 CON-S, (c) HIV-1 JR-CSF, (d) HIV-1 A244, (e) HIV-1
JR-FL, (f) HIV-1 SF162, and (g) the alignment of the V3 domain sequences
derived from different HIV-1 strains. The numbering is based on the
HBX2 strain; the gp is the sequence of the designed synthetic glycopeptide
where the highly variable tip was deleted to avoid dominant strain-specific
immune response. The CN54, CON-S, and JR-CSF gp120s and JR-FL and
SF162 gp140s all have a conserved N-glycan at the N332 site, while
the N332 glycosylation site was shifted to N334 in the A244 gp120.
Comparison of the antisera binding to the envelope
glycoprotein
gp120s and gp140s derived from different HIV-1 strains. (a) HIV-1
CN54, (b) HIV-1 CON-S, (c) HIV-1 JR-CSF, (d) HIV-1 A244, (e) HIV-1
JR-FL, (f) HIV-1 SF162, and (g) the alignment of the V3 domain sequences
derived from different HIV-1 strains. The numbering is based on the
HBX2 strain; the gp is the sequence of the designed synthetic glycopeptide
where the highly variable tip was deleted to avoid dominant strain-specific
immune response. The CN54, CON-S, and JR-CSF gp120s and JR-FL and
SF162 gp140s all have a conserved N-glycan at the N332 site, while
the N332 glycosylation site was shifted to N334 in the A244 gp120.
Binding of Antisera to
Synthetic Glycopeptides
We next
evaluated binding of the antisera to synthetic mono-, bi-, and trivalent
V3 glycopeptides with a biotin tag (Figure a), which were used in our previous studies
to recapitulate the neutralizing epitope of PGT bNAbs.[23] To focus on the glycan-dependent antibodies,
we pretreated the antisera by incubation with the aglycone V3 peptide 5 loaded on magnetic beads to remove the peptide binding antibodies.[19] Then we analyzed the pretreated sera binding
to mono-, bi-, and trivalent JR-FL V3 glycopeptide (6, 7, and 8) carrying a high-mannose glycan
at the N332 site. For the pretreated antisera induced by the monovalent
immunogen 1, the antibodies showed almost equal binding
to the mono-, bi-, and trivalent glycopeptides (Figure b). However, the pretreated antisera induced
by the three-component trivalent immunogen showed significant binding
preference to the multivalent glycopeptides (Figure c). The antisera binding titers by the bi-
and trivalent glycopeptides (1:25600) were 16-fold higher than the
titers induced by the monovalent glycopeptide (1:1600). Although many
antibodies, including partially glycopeptide binding antibodies, were
removed by the aglycone peptide incubation, substantial glycan-dependent
antibodies were still left in the sera (Figure d,e), and these antibodies preferentially
bind to the multivalent glycopeptides. To evaluate whether the antisera
bind to high-mannose glycans alone, we also performed ELISA binding
to the corresponding trivalent high-mannose glycan conjugate (9), which has the same triazole linker as found in the mono-,
bi-, and trivalent synthetic glycopeptides (6–8) (Figure a). It was found that the pretreated antisera induced by trivalent
immunogen 4 showed only very weak binding to the trivalent
conjugate (9) carrying three Man9GlcNAc2glycans, without the V3 peptide context (Figure c). Surprisingly, the nontreated
antisera induced by immunogen 1 and 4 also
showed only weak binding to the trivalent glycan construct (9) (Figure S2). These results indicated
that the linker used in the trivalent immunogen 4 was
only weakly immunogenic compared to the glycopeptide antigen, and
that the antibodies raised by the trivalent glycopeptide immunogen
(4) were V3 glycopeptide-specific, as the antisera interacted
only weakly with the respective peptide, linker, or the glycan portions
alone. It should be noted that a majority of the antibodies raised
by the immunization were glycopeptide-specific, as the antisera after
depletion by pretreatment with the nonglycosylated V3 peptide, i.e.,
the pretreated antisera, did not show substantial loss of the responses
to the respective glycopeptide antigens in the ELISAs (Figure d,e). To evaluate whether the
antisera could distinguish between different N-glycans attached to
the N332 site in the glycopeptides, we also compared the binding of
the antisera to the biotinylated glycopeptide (6) carrying
a Man9GlcNAc2glycan at N332 and the corresponding
glycopeptide carrying a Man5GlcNAc2 glycan at
the N332 site (Figure S3). It was found
that the pretreated sera induced by immunogen 1 showed
substantially decreased binding to a JR-FL V3 glycopeptide with a
Man5 glycan at the N332, in comparison with glycopeptide 6 (Figure S3). This result suggested
that the antibodies induced also recognized the nature of the N-glycan
at N332. The binding behavior of the induced antibodies was very similar
to bNAb 10-1074, which also showed significant binding preference
to the multivalent glycopeptides and HIV-1gp120s carrying a high-mannoseN-glycan (supposedly Man8/Man9GlcNAc2) at the conserved N332 glycosylation
site, but did not demonstrate apparent binding to free high-mannose
and other N-glycans in glycan array analysis.[12,23]
Figure 3
ELISA
binding to the synthetic V3 glycopeptides. (a) Structure
of the V3 peptide and glycopeptides used for ELISA analysis. (b) Binding
of the pretreated antisera induced by the three-component immunogen 1 to the V3 peptides and glycopeptides. (c) Binding of pretreated
antisera induced by three-component trivalent immunogen 4 to the V3 peptide (5), glycopeptides (6–8), and trivalent glycan cluster (9). (d) Binding of the antisera and pretreated antisera induced by
immunogen 1 to monovalent glycopeptide 6. (e) Antisera and pretreated antisera induced by immunogen 4 to trivalent glycopeptide 8.
ELISA
binding to the synthetic V3 glycopeptides. (a) Structure
of the V3 peptide and glycopeptides used for ELISA analysis. (b) Binding
of the pretreated antisera induced by the three-component immunogen 1 to the V3 peptides and glycopeptides. (c) Binding of pretreated
antisera induced by three-component trivalent immunogen 4 to the V3 peptide (5), glycopeptides (6–8), and trivalent glycan cluster (9). (d) Binding of the antisera and pretreated antisera induced by
immunogen 1 to monovalent glycopeptide 6. (e) Antisera and pretreated antisera induced by immunogen 4 to trivalent glycopeptide 8.
Viral Neutralization Assays
HIV-1bNAbs typically have
unusual traits including long heavy-chain third complementarity-determining
regions, high levels of somatic mutations, and high frequency of insertions
and deletions.[28,29] So far, there is only one example
showing broad and potent neutralizing serum responses targeting the
CD4 binding site by immunization with a well-ordered Env trimer in
cow.[30] Most bNAb evolution during HIV-1-infection
has been observed after extensive virus Env diversification.[31] To examine if the antisera generated in the
short-term preliminary immunization possess any neutralizing activity,
we performed a TZM-bl cell-based neutralization assay of the antisera
against tier 1 and tier 2 HIV-1 viruses.[32,33] The preliminary results indicated that the antisera induced by the
trivalent glycopeptide immunogen (4) did not show neutralizing
activities (data not shown). This result was similar to recent immunization
studies with the monovalent immunogen in rabbits[19] and with a synthetic mini-V3 glycopeptide mixed with an
adjuvant in rhesus macaque.[17] In another
related study, repetitive vaccination with a high-mannose glycan form
of HIV-1Env over a 4 year period resulted in induction of V3-glycan-specific
antibodies.[34] The antibodies showed neutralizing
activities, but they were neutralizing only pseudoviruses carrying
high density of high-mannose N-glycans.
Discussion
HIV-1envelope is presented on the virus surface as a trimer and
is the sole target for HIV-1-specific antibodies. The envelope trimer
is more immunogenic than monomeric gp120.[35] Stable and soluble SOSIP Env trimers that mimic the Env spike on
virus surface is a promising strategy for HIV-1 vaccine.[36] However, except one recent immunization in cows
that showed broadly neutralizing antibody responses targeting the
CD4 binding site,[30] immunization with SOSIP
trimers has not been able to induce bNAbs, indicating that additional
strategies are required. New immunogen designs need to be optimized
to display the precise neutralizing epitopes. One potential method
is to design well-defined synthetic vaccines to elicit an immune response
to target the neutralizing epitope more reliably and precisely.[37] In the present study, we designed a three-component
trivalent HIV glycopeptide immunogen that contains a universal T-helper
epitope, a TLR2 ligand, and a trivalent HIV-1glycopeptide antigen
in a single molecule aiming to mimic the trimeric antigen presentation
on the Env. Preliminary rabbit immunization indicated that the three-component
trivalent glycopeptide immunogen could elicit stronger antibody responses
than the corresponding monovalent glycopeptide immunogen. Interestingly,
the induced glycopeptide-specific antibodies showed binding preference
to the bi- and trivalent glycopeptide antigens, although it is to
be demonstrated whether any of the antibodies raised by the trivalent
glycopeptide immunogen also showed preference to Env trimer. Similar
to previous monovalent glycopeptide immunogens,[17,19] no neutralizing activity against tier 1 and tier 2 HIV-1 viruses
was detected for the antisera from the preliminary immunization study,
possibly due to the lack of somatic mutation of the antibodies in
a short-term immunization. These results are not unexpected because
in natural infection it can take 1–2 years to develop potent
broadly neutralizing antibodies. Nevertheless, the synthetic three-component
trivalent glycopeptide immunogen showed substantially enhanced immunogenicity
over the monovalent glycopeptide immunogen to elicit HIV-1glycopeptide
epitope-dependent antibody responses. As for HIV-1 vaccine design,
future studies should be directed to further characterization of the
glycopeptide-specific antibodies elicited, and the assessment of immunogenicity
of the three-component trivalent glycopeptide immunogen in nonhuman
primate models, in combination with other HIV-1 vaccine candidates,
such as the SOSIP trimer, aiming to boost glycopeptide epitope-specific,
broadly neutralizing antibody responses.
Conclusion
We
describe in this paper a synthesis and preliminary immunization
analysis of a three-component glycopeptide immunogen carrying a trivalent
HIV-1 V3 glycopeptide antigen. The antisera induced by the three-component
trivalent glycopeptide immunogen show stronger binding to gp120s and
trimeric gp140s from several major HIV-1 strains than the antisera
induced by the monovalent glycopeptide immunogen. Binding analysis
also indicated that the synthetic immunogen induced substantial glycopeptide-specific
antibodies that recognize the glycopeptide epitope as an integrated
moiety. The ability to induce substantial glycopeptide epitope-specific
antibodies suggests that this glycopeptide immunogen construct may
serve as an important component for a prime-boost regimen in combination
with other vaccine candidates to eventually elicit glycopeptide neutralizing
epitope-specific, broadly neutralizing antibodies.
Authors: Steven W de Taeye; Gabriel Ozorowski; Alba Torrents de la Peña; Miklos Guttman; Jean-Philippe Julien; Tom L G M van den Kerkhof; Judith A Burger; Laura K Pritchard; Pavel Pugach; Anila Yasmeen; Jordan Crampton; Joyce Hu; Ilja Bontjer; Jonathan L Torres; Heather Arendt; Joanne DeStefano; Wayne C Koff; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Dirk Eggink; Ben Berkhout; Hansi Dean; Celia LaBranche; Shane Crotty; Max Crispin; David C Montefiori; P J Klasse; Kelly K Lee; John P Moore; Ian A Wilson; Andrew B Ward; Rogier W Sanders Journal: Cell Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Hui Cai; Jared Orwenyo; Javier Guenaga; John Giddens; Christian Toonstra; Richard T Wyatt; Lai-Xi Wang Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Marcella Sarzotti-Kelsoe; Robert T Bailer; Ellen Turk; Chen-li Lin; Miroslawa Bilska; Kelli M Greene; Hongmei Gao; Christopher A Todd; Daniel A Ozaki; Michael S Seaman; John R Mascola; David C Montefiori Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Nancy S Longo; Matthew S Sutton; Andrea R Shiakolas; Javier Guenaga; Marissa C Jarosinski; Ivelin S Georgiev; Krisha McKee; Robert T Bailer; Mark K Louder; Sijy O'Dell; Mark Connors; Richard T Wyatt; John R Mascola; Nicole A Doria-Rose Journal: J Virol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Joseph G Joyce; Isaac J Krauss; Hong C Song; David W Opalka; Karen M Grimm; Deborah D Nahas; Mark T Esser; Renee Hrin; Meizhen Feng; Vadim Y Dudkin; Michael Chastain; John W Shiver; Samuel J Danishefsky Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura M Walker; Michael Huber; Katie J Doores; Emilia Falkowska; Robert Pejchal; Jean-Philippe Julien; Sheng-Kai Wang; Alejandra Ramos; Po-Ying Chan-Hui; Matthew Moyle; Jennifer L Mitcham; Phillip W Hammond; Ole A Olsen; Pham Phung; Steven Fling; Chi-Huey Wong; Sanjay Phogat; Terri Wrin; Melissa D Simek; Wayne C Koff; Ian A Wilson; Dennis R Burton; Pascal Poignard Journal: Nature Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jeong Hyun Lee; Raiees Andrabi; Ching-Yao Su; Anila Yasmeen; Jean-Philippe Julien; Leopold Kong; Nicholas C Wu; Ryan McBride; Devin Sok; Matthias Pauthner; Christopher A Cottrell; Travis Nieusma; Claudia Blattner; James C Paulson; Per Johan Klasse; Ian A Wilson; Dennis R Burton; Andrew B Ward Journal: Immunity Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Satoru Horiya; Jennifer K Bailey; J Sebastian Temme; Yollete V Guillen Schlippe; Isaac J Krauss Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Thomas C Donahue; Guanghui Zong; Nicholas A O'Brien; Chong Ou; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve; Lai-Xi Wang Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.069
Authors: Hui Cai; Rou-Shu Zhang; Jared Orwenyo; John Giddens; Qiang Yang; Celia C LaBranche; David C Montefiori; Lai-Xi Wang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.446