Devin Sok1,2,3,4, Khoa M Le1,2,3,4, Melissa Vadnais5, Karen L Saye-Francisco1,2,3, Joseph G Jardine1,2,3, Jonathan L Torres6, Zachary T Berndsen6, Leopold Kong6, Robyn Stanfield6, Jennifer Ruiz1,2,3,4, Alejandra Ramos1,2,3,4, Chi-Hui Liang1,2,3, Patricia L Chen7, Michael F Criscitiello7, Waithaka Mwangi8, Ian A Wilson2,3,6, Andrew B Ward2,3,6, Vaughn V Smider5, Dennis R Burton1,2,3,9. 1. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 2. IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 3. Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology and Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 4. International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, New York 10004, USA. 5. Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 6. Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 7. Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA. 8. Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medical, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA. 9. Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02129, USA.
Abstract
No immunogen to date has reliably elicited broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV in humans or animal models. Advances in the design of immunogens that antigenically mimic the HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env), such as the soluble cleaved trimer BG505 SOSIP, have improved the elicitation of potent isolate-specific antibody responses in rabbits and macaques, but so far failed to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies. One possible reason for this failure is that the relevant antibody repertoires are poorly suited to target the conserved epitope regions on Env, which are somewhat occluded relative to the exposed variable epitopes. Here, to test this hypothesis, we immunized four cows with BG505 SOSIP. The antibody repertoire of cows contains long third heavy chain complementary determining regions (HCDR3) with an ultralong subset that can reach more than 70 amino acids in length. Remarkably, BG505 SOSIP immunization resulted in rapid elicitation of broad and potent serum antibody responses in all four cows. Longitudinal serum analysis for one cow showed the development of neutralization breadth (20%, n = 117 cross-clade isolates) in 42 days and 96% breadth (n = 117) at 381 days. A monoclonal antibody isolated from this cow harboured an ultralong HCDR3 of 60 amino acids and neutralized 72% of cross-clade isolates (n = 117) with a potent median IC50 of 0.028 μg ml-1. Breadth was elicited with a single trimer immunogen and did not require additional envelope diversity. Immunization of cows may provide an avenue to rapidly generate antibody prophylactics and therapeutics to address disease agents that have evolved to avoid human antibody responses.
No immunogen to date has reliably elicited broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV in humans or animal models. Advances in the design of immunogens that antigenically mimic the HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env), such as the soluble cleaved trimer BG505 SOSIP, have improved the elicitation of potent isolate-specific antibody responses in rabbits and macaques, but so far failed to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies. One possible reason for this failure is that the relevant antibody repertoires are poorly suited to target the conserved epitope regions on Env, which are somewhat occluded relative to the exposed variable epitopes. Here, to test this hypothesis, we immunized four cows with BG505 SOSIP. The antibody repertoire of cows contains long third heavy chain complementary determining regions (HCDR3) with an ultralong subset that can reach more than 70 amino acids in length. Remarkably, BG505 SOSIP immunization resulted in rapid elicitation of broad and potent serum antibody responses in all four cows. Longitudinal serum analysis for one cow showed the development of neutralization breadth (20%, n = 117 cross-clade isolates) in 42 days and 96% breadth (n = 117) at 381 days. A monoclonal antibody isolated from this cow harboured an ultralong HCDR3 of 60 amino acids and neutralized 72% of cross-clade isolates (n = 117) with a potent median IC50 of 0.028 μg ml-1. Breadth was elicited with a single trimer immunogen and did not require additional envelope diversity. Immunization of cows may provide an avenue to rapidly generate antibody prophylactics and therapeutics to address disease agents that have evolved to avoid human antibody responses.
No immunogen to date has been able to reliably elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) to HIV by vaccination. The difficulty in eliciting bnAbs has been attributed to the enormous antigenic diversity of the envelope glycoprotein and to the dense N-linked glycan coat that covers Env (the ‘glycan shield’). BnAbs isolated from chronic infection have a number of unusual features that have been selected to cope with the glycan shield including much longer than average HCDR3 loops[10-12]. HCDR3s in most vertebrates have restricted lengths that predominantly encode loops of 12–16 amino acids upon VDJ recombination[9,13-15]. Therefore, in many species, relatively few antibody precursors can be affinity-matured to HIV bnAbs. Cows, however, produce antibodies with HCDR3s that average ~26 amino acids in length with an ultralong subset (10–15% of the repertoire) that can be over 70 amino acids in length[4-6,8,9,16]. Previous work has shown that repeated immunization over multiple years with a non-well-ordered Env trimer in cows can lead to some neutralization breadth in the immunoglobulin-rich colostrum[17-19], although with relatively low potency. Here, we immunized cows with the well-ordered BG505 trimer, showed the longitudinal development of potent extensive neutralization breadth and demonstrated that antibodies with ultralong HCDR3s are responsible for serum breadth and potency.To investigate immunization with a well-ordered Env trimer in cows, two experiments were performed (Fig. 1a). A first pilot experiment involved immunization with JR-FL gp120 and BG505 SOSIP on each flank of two cows. Evaluation of sera on an indicator virus panel[20] showed that both cows developed neutralization breadth and potency, with one cow (#3441) developing exceptionally potent responses (Fig. 1b). Based on these initial results, two additional cows were immunized with BG505 SOSIP alone (Fig. 1a). The terminal bleeds (day 381) for these two cows were also tested on the indicator virus panel and similar cross-clade neutralizing serum responses were observed (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1
Cows develop broadly neutralizing serum antibodies when immunized with the HIV envelope trimer mimic BG505 SOSIP
(a) Schematic of SOSIP immunization experiments in cows. (b) Sera from all four cows were tested for neutralization on a 12-virus “global isolate” panel that serves as an indicator for breadth and potency. Presented values are neutralization ID50 titers. Murine Leukemia Virus (MLV) was included as a negative control.
We next determined how quickly these responses developed. Sera from cow 26 and cow 27 were sampled approximately every 7 days and tested on the same virus indicator panel (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 1). Remarkably, the results show the development of cross-neutralizing activity (8% breadth, n = 12) only 42 days following a prime and single homologous boost with BG505 SOSIP for cow #26. Autologous neutralization emerged at the same time as broad responses and potency increased over time (Extended Data Fig. 2). Cow #27 also developed broad responses, although more delayed than for cow #26 (Fig. 2a). Evaluation of the day 35 timepoint (14 days after first boost) for cows #148 and #344 (Fig. 2a) from experiment 1 similarly showed rapid emergence of breadth albeit with lower potency (Extended Data Fig. 3).
Figure 2
Rapid development of neutralization breadth and potency in cows
(a) Sera collected longitudinally for cow #26 and cow #27 were tested for neutralization on the 12-virus indicator panel. Neutralization ID50 titers are presented for each virus by color at each timepoint. Percent neutralization breadth is indicated by the black line. (b) Sera at select timepoints were tested on a larger cross-clade 117-virus panel. Presented values are neutralization breadth and median neutralization ID50 titers grouped by virus clade.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Serum collected at different timepoints over the course of immunization for cows 26 and 27 were evaluated for neutralization breath and potency on the 12-virus global indicator panel
Values represent serum ID50 against the indicated virus and colored according to the legend.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Autologous serum timepoints tested for neutralization on BG505 pseudovirus
Neutralization against autologous virus emerged at the same time as breadth (d42) and increased in potency over time. Values represent serum ID50.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Development of neutralization breadth at 35 days post immunization from cows in experiment 1
Serum collected at day 35 from experiment 1 were tested for neutralization breadth and potency on the 12-virus global indicator panel. Values represent serum ID50.
To fully evaluate the extent of neutralization breadth, we tested sera from cow #26 on a 117 cross-clade virus panel (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 1) using the following timepoints: d42, d77, d238, and d381. The results showed higher neutralization breadth at the earliest time point (day 42, 20% breadth) than observed for the indicator panel (8%). Following a second boost (d77), this breadth expanded to 79% of isolates. At day 238 and day 381, breadth continued to rise to 92% and 96% of isolates, respectively. Potency, determined by median ID50 titers, also increased with consecutive boosts.Next, we attempted to isolate bnAbs from cow #26. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from timepoints d70 and d238 were sorted with fluorophores conjugated to anti-cow IgG, and biotinylated BG505 SOSIP was used as antigen bait as described previously (Extended Data Fig. 4)[21]. Sorting and screening of PBMCs at different timepoints (Extended Data Fig. 5) using different sort strategies (Extended Data Fig. 4) resulted in the isolation of 10 mAbs named NC-Cow1 to NC-Cow10. Sequences and alignments of the heavy and light chain sequences for NC-Cow1 to NC-Cow10 are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Interestingly, all 10 antibodies have ultralong HCDR3s (Fig. 3a)
Extended Data Fig. 4
Sorting strategy for isolating antigen-specific IgG+ B cells
(A) Cow PBMCs were sorted for IgG+ cells that bound to biotinylated BG505 SOSIP-AviTag conjugated on PE and APC fluorophores. (B) To isolate epitope-specific antibodies, unliganded BG505 SOSIP (blue) and BG505 SOSIP liganded with NC-Cow1 was used to antigen-sort memory B cells. Epitope-specific B cells are defined as binding unliganded SOSIP and not binding to liganded SOSIP. This sort strategy yielded the broadly neutralizing antibodies NC-Cow7 to NC-Cow10.
Extended Data Fig. 5
Functional screening and sequencing information for isolated antibodies
(A) Amplified heavy chains were paired with universal cow light chain or with NC-Cow1 light chain and tested for expression (anti-Fc ELISA), Ag binding (BG505 SOSIP), autologous neutralization (BG505 pseudovirus), and heterologous neutralization (Q23 pseudovirus). Sequence alignment of recovered heavy chains are listed underneath. As ultralong HCDR3 antibodies have been reported to pair with a single germline light chain (V30), amplified heavy chain genes were first paired with the universal cow light chain and screened for expression, binding to BG505 SOSIP, neutralization of BG505 virus, and neutralization of a clade A heterologous virus, Q23. From this dataset, 3 antibodies (named NC-Cow1, NC-Cow2, and NC-Cow3) were selected that showed autologous neutralization (all from d238) and corresponding native light chains were amplified, with success for only NC-Cow1. These three antibodies were expressed and purified at larger scale for additional characterization by maintaining native pairing for NC-Cow1 and pairing with germline V30 for NC-Cow2 and NC-Cow3. For the d70 timepoint, three heavy chains were selected that showed binding to BG505 SOSIP, but no neutralization, and these antibodies were produced with their native light chain pairs (NC-Cow4 to NC-Cow6). Finally, as NC-Cow1 could neutralize isolate Q23 in the neutralization screen, an additional sort with PBMCs from d381 was performed, but used BG505 SOSIP liganded with and without NC-Cow1 to enrich for epitope-specific antibodies. The enrichment yielded an additional 5 hits by neutralization screen, and 4 out of these 5 antibodies were produced at larger scale with their native light chain pairs (NC-Cow7 to NC-Cow10). Small-scale screening was also performed with all heavy chains paired with NC-Cow1 light chain and no significant increase in neutralization breadth was observed, although there were slight improvements in BG505 SOSIP affinity or autologous potency. (B) Nucleotide alignment of heavy chain sequences of isolated monoclonal antibodies[34].
Figure 3
Isolation and characterization of a broadly neutralizing cow antibody
(a) HCDR3s are shown for antibodies NC-Cow1–10. The sequence for germline IGHV1-7/VHBUL, IGHD8-2, and IGHJ10 regions are shown at the top. HCDR3 length (L), number of cysteines within HCDR3 (#Cys), and HCDR3 numbering are listed. Cysteines within HCDR3 are highlighted yellow, with those conserved with the germline underlined, and the cysteine and tryptophan defining HCDR3 are highlighted cyan. (b) NC-Cow1 was analyzed for neutralization breadth and potency on a 117-virus panel. (c) NC-Cow1–10 antibodies map to the VRC01-class epitope by competition ELISA. (d) To determine if the HCDR3 of NC-Cow1 is effective at neutralization on its own, four chimeras were tested on the 12-virus global isolates indicator panel. An IC50 value of 50μg/ml was used a cut-off for neutralization.
To understand the neutralization properties of these 10 antibodies, we evaluated them on the 12-virus indicator panel as well as several clade A viruses and found that NC-Cow2 to NC-Cow6 had narrow breadth, while NC-Cow1 and NC-Cow7 to NC-Cow10 have broadly neutralizing activity (Extended Data Table 1). NC-Cow1 demonstrated the greatest breadth, so this bnAb was evaluated on a larger 117-virus panel and was found to have 72% neutralization breadth with a potent median IC50 of 0.028 μg/ml (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 1). All 10 mAbs competed with VRC01-class antibodies on a stabilized BG505 SOSIP trimer termed MD39 (Fig. 3c)[22]. With the epitope specificity of NC-Cow1 identified, we next performed serum competition experiments with NC-Cow1 and found that the main serum specificity was to the CD4bs (Extended Data Table 2). We found relatively low serum reactivity to the BG505 V3 loop (Extended Data Table 2). Finally, we determined that NC-Cow1 was not polyreactive to human antigens in a HEp-2 assay and in an ELISA binding assay (Extended Data Fig. 6).
Extended Table 1
Evaluation of purified recombinant antibody for neutralization breadth and potency.Antibodies were expressed and purified and tested on the 12-virus global indicator panel as well as clade A viruses. Values are neutralization IC50 in mg/ml. The timepoint from which the antibodies were isolated are indicated at the top and antibodies paired with universal light chain are indicated with an asterisk – all other antibodies were produced using native heavy and light chain pairs.
PBMC timepoint:CLADE
d238NC-Cow1
d238NC-Cow2*
d238NC-Cow3*
d70NC-Cow4
d70NC-Cow5
d70NC-Cow6
d381NC-Cow7
d381NC-Cow8
d381NC-Cow9
d381NC-Cow10
BG505.N332
A
0.010
0.440
1.69
0.027
10.1
0.134
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.003
MG505.A2
A
0.011
1.72
1.53
0.023
4.48
0.057
0.002
0.003
0.011
0.020
398F1
A
0.015
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
5.80
4.87
7.94
0.317
25710
C
0.006
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
2.14
0.251
0.211
0.002
CNE8
CRF01_AE
2.81
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
TRO.11
B
0.035
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
X2278
B
0.019
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
10.7
21.5
>50
BJOX2000
CRF07_BC
2.14
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
2.25
>50
>50
>50
X1632
G
0.022
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
1.26
0.051
0.165
0.034
Ce1176
C
0.013
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
25.6
0.247
2.300
0.079
246F3
AC
0.147
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
20.5
CH119
CRF07_BC
0.032
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
21.0
>50
>50
1.88
Ce0217
C
0.007
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
1.87
0.211
0.913
0.004
CNE55
CRF01_AE
0.001
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
0.27
1.86
0.48
MS208.A1
A
0.036
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
4.30
6.67
13.4
4.15
Q23.17
A
0.023
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
0.002
0.021
0.160
0.009
Q461.e2
A
0.071
1.64
>50
2.46
>50
2.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.02
Q769.d22
A
0.012
0.566
35.3
0.543
>50
0.858
0.000
0.003
0.059
0.003
Q259.d2.17
A
3.983
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
Q842.d12
A
0.010
0.896
5.50
0.085
13.9
0.150
0.003
0.088
0.128
0.042
0260.v5.c36
A
0.020
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
0.003
0.006
0.118
0.006
191955_A11
A
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
0.008
>50
>50
>50
191084 B7-19
A
0.008
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
1.40
0.668
3.86
0.035
SIVmac239
NA
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
M-MLV
NA
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
Extended Table 2
Mapping epitope specificity over time.Serum samples from cow 26 were for competition by NC-Cow1. Values present serum dilution EC50 titers for BG505 SOSIP and for BG505 V3 peptide.
Prime
D14
D28
Boost D35
D56
Boost D63
D91
Boost D98
D182
Boost D211
D238
Boost D360
D0
D50
D77
D133
D231
D381
BG505 SOSIP
Serum
36
29
20
988
1058
6556
3310
450
3749
18309
9376
11554
Serum + NC-Cow1
10
10
10
225
282
786
602
201
606
3537
1332
1888
V3 peptide
Serum
24
20
23
138
200
546
353
205
342
847
414
350
Extended Data Fig. 6
NC-Cow1 is not polyreactive to human antigens
(A) NC-Cow1 was tested for antigen reactivity in a HEp2 assay compared to the known polyreactive antibody 4E10, and negative and positive control sera supplied by the manufacturer. (B) NC-Cow1 was also tested for reactivity with a range of typical human autoantigens by ELISA as well as for binding to solubilized membrane (SMP) and cytosolic preparations (SCP) from CHO cells. Values are optical density values (OD405) at a 100 μg/ml dose. Black line indicates cut-off values as indicated by the manufacturer.
To further understand the binding mechanisms of these antibodies, single particle negative stain electron microscopy was used to visually characterize the NC-Cow1 and NC-Cow2 epitopes. In each dataset, the Fab was clearly visible adjacent to the CD4bs in 2-dimensional class averages (Extended Data Fig. 7). We calculated a 3-dimensional reconstruction of NC-Cow1, which confirmed the CD4bs epitope (Extended Data Fig. 7). We next compared VRC01 and NC-Cow1 binding to a panel of gp120 CD4 binding site alanine mutants for isolates BG505 and JR-CSF (Extended Data Fig. 7). NC-Cow 1 showed sensitivity to several known CD4bs Ab residues including D368R for binding to BG505 gp120 (Extended Data Fig. 7). For both isolates, VRC01 was shown to be highly dependent on N279, as described previously[23]. In contrast, NC-Cow1 was not dependent on N279, but was instead dependent on residues in the C2 and C5 regions of gp120.
Extended Data Fig. 7
Epitope mapping of NC-Cow1
(A) Representative 2D class averages of cow Fabs NC-Cow1 and NC-Cow2 bound to BG505 SOSIP trimers to demonstrate CD4bs site specificity. The Fabs appear at slightly different angles relative to the trimer, perhaps due to some flexibility between the Fab and HCDR3. In the 2D class averages for NC-Cow1, the HCDR3 appears as a faint density bridging between the Fab and CD4bs. (B) Top and side views of 3D reconstruction of NC-Cow1 bound to BG505 SOSIP trimer with previously published Env trimer structure (green, PDB 5CEZ) and cow Fab (orange, PDB 5IJV) docked in. The body of NC-Cow1 Fab is approximately 20 Å away from the CD4 binding site, which is the estimated length of the ultralong HCDR3. (C) NC-Cow 1 was tested for binding by ELISA to BG505 or JRCSF gp120 captured from lysed virions with PGT121 (V3-glycan epitope) and VRC01 (CD4bs epitope) included for comparison. Values are EC50 in mg/ml. NC-Cow1 was also tested on BG505 or JR-CSF pseudoviruses and corresponding alanine mutants with PGT121 (V3-glycan epitope) and 12A12 (CD4bs epitope) included for comparison. Values are IC50 in mg/ml. (D) NC-Cow1 was tested for binding to WT and D368R protein. Antibodies VRC01 (CD4bs) and 14e (V3) were included for comparison.
We next sought to determine if the HCDR3 knob is functional on its own and/or if the antibody retains function when reverted to its inferred germline. We evaluated NC-Cow1 for neutralization on the 12-virus indicator panel, which demonstrated 100% breadth at a potent median IC50 of 0.007 μg/ml (Fig. 3d). Compared to this affinity-matured antibody, partial or fully reverted antibody variants showed no or little decrease in neutralization breadth and potency (Fig. 3d). We next transplanted the 60-amino acidHCDR3 of NC-Cow1 to a germline reverted variant of HIV bnAb PG9 and tested for neutralization on the 12-virus indicator panel. We observed a moderate drop to 88% neutralization breadth with a reduction in potency to a median IC50 of 0.054 μg/ml. Although somewhat less active than the original antibody, the neutralization breadth and potency of a 60-amino acidHCDR3 knob transplanted onto a germline antibody is remarkable, and may have implications for therapeutic designs.A number of HIV bnAbs have been or are being tested as potential microbicides to prevent mucosal HIV acquisition[24]. Of note, VRC01-class antibodies rely on a critical salt bridge interaction with an aspartic acid residue at position 368 of gp120[23] that is disrupted at low pH (Extended Data Fig. 8), which is characteristic of conditions found in the vagina. NC-Cow1, however, retained affinity for gp120 in simulated vaginal fluid (SVF), pH 4.5, suggesting that the antibody might be useful as a potential microbicide, although this application warrants further exploration (Extended Data Fig. 8).
Extended Data Fig. 8
Effects of pH on binding of NC-Cow1 and CD4bs antibodies to gp120
(A) CD4bs antibodies PGV04, 12A12, 3BNC60, and b12 were tested for binding to gp120 (isolate 92BR020) by ELISA in buffers at different pHs (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0). (B) NC-Cow1 and VRC01 were tested for binding to BG505 gp120 in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) compared to simulated vaginal fluid (SVF), pH 4.5.
Here we have shown that immunization with a well-ordered Env trimer in cows reliably and rapidly elicits broad and potent neutralizing serum responses in contrast to previous experiments in other animals. As far as we are aware, the only previous example of elicitation of broad serum neutralization and subsequent isolation of bnAbs was in llamas, when 7 immunizations with an Env trimer (not well-ordered) over 4 months resulted in poor serum neutralization breadth and potency and subsequent screening of >2,800 unique camelid-specific variable region (VHH) fragments identified only one with broad and potent neutralizing activity[25,26].The results described here argue that bnAb epitopes on HIV Env are only immunoquiescent in a repertoire-dependent fashion. The CDbs is recessed and occluded on the native trimer, which greatly hinders access by human neutralizing antibodies and thereby renders the CD4bs effectively immunoquiescent in humans. The long HCDR3 of cow antibodies are nonetheless able to easily access the CD4bs on the trimer, therefore rendering this region immunogenic in the context of the cow antibody repertoire.Importantly, different trimer isolates were not required to elicit breadth, indicating that diversity might not be required provided that conserved epitopes are accessible. The speed of developing a bnAb to the CD4bs of HIV Env in cows is remarkable when contrasted with the length of time required to elicit similar antibodies in humans through natural infection (> 5 years). One lesson from these studies for HIV vaccine design is that immunization-priming steps that favor the selection of long HCDR3s may accelerate the development of bnAbs.Finally, the rapid elicitation of functional responses against a difficult target like HIV Env suggests that cow immunization should be explored to rapidly generate antibodies against other pathogens that have evolved to avoid human antibody responses, such as malaria. Such antibodies, as well as their intrinsic prophylactic and therapeutic value, can help define targets for vaccine and drug design.
METHODS/SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Pseudovirus Neutralization Assays
Plasmids encoding HIV Env were co-transfected into HEK 293T cells (ATCC) with pSG3ΔEnv, an Env-deficient genomic backbone plasmid, in a 1:2 ratio using X-tremeGENE HP (Roche) as transfection reagent. Cell culture supernatants were harvested 3 days post transfection and sterile filtered through a 0.22μm filter. Neutralizing activity was measured by incubating monoclonal antibodies or sera with replication incompetent pseudovirus for 1h at 37C before transferring onto TZM-bl target cells (aidsreagent.org) as described previously[10].
BG505 SOSIP trimer expression and purification
BG505 SOSIP.664 gp140, BG505 SOSIP.664-His gp140, and BG505 SOSIP.664-avi gp140 were expressed in HEK293F (Invitrogen) as described previously[14]. Briefly, HEK293F cells were maintained in FreeStyle medium (Invitrogen). For gp140 trimer production, HEK293F cells were seeded at a density of 0.5×106/mL. After 24 h, cells were transfected with 1 mg of 293Fectin (Invitrogen) with 300 μg of Env plasmid and 75 μg of furin plasmid in OPTI-MEM according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Supernatants were purified using a Galanthus nivalis lectin (Vector Labs) column and protein was eluted with 1M methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside (MMP, Sigma). Following buffer exchange into PBS, only trimers with AviTags were in vitro biotinylated using the BirA enzyme according to the manufacturer protocol (Avidity). The affinity-purified Env proteins were further purified to size homogeneity using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on a Superose 6 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in PBS. The trimer fractions were collected and pooled and protein concentrations were determined using either a bicinchonic acid-based assay (Thermo Scientific) or UV280 absorbance using theoretical extinction coefficients.
Cow immunization
Bos tauruscalves six months of age were used to analyze the bovine immune response against HIV antigens. Animals were primed and boosted by intradermal inoculation. Two animals were selected for two different immunization experiments as a pilot study, yielding a sample size of four animals total. All four animals were bled from the jugular vein as often as once a week for serum and for the isolation of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood. Animals and subsequent analyses were not randomized or blinded. Heifers 148 and #3441 were Angus cross breeds immunized with 200 μg BG505 SOSIP trimer (200 μL antigen/800 μL adjuvant inoculations were divided into five 200 μl injections with Iscomatrix adjuvant for #148 and RIBI for #3441) on one side and 200 μg JRFL gp120 on the other (200 μL antigen/800 μL adjuvant inoculations were split into five 200 μl injections with RIBI adjuvant). Both heifers #148 and #3441 were boosted at Day 21 with 200 μg of the same antigen on the same side of the neck as previously received, and once more on Day 78 with the same delivery of immunogen as the first boost. All boosts of these two heifers employed RIBI as adjuvant. Holstein steers #26 and #27 received immunizations of 200 μg BG505 SOSIP trimer (total spread over five sites on each side of neck) emulsified in equal volume of ENABL C1 (VaxLiant) adjuvant. Boosts of equal amounts of antigen were administered on Days 36, 64, and 99, 148, 211, and 360. Exceptions were that on Day 99 the boost was administered with RIBI adjuvant instead of ENABL C1. Cows #26 and #27 were euthanized for tissue harvest into RNAlater for RNA and cDNA preparation of immune tissues. These protocols were approved by the Texas A&M Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for MFC as AUP 2015-078.
Single Particle Negative Stain Electron Microscopy
BG505 SOSIP.664 + NC-Cow1 complexes were placed on glow-discharged carbon coated copper mesh grids and stained with 2% uranyl formate. Grids were screened for appropriate stain thickness and particle distribution using an FEI Morgagni (80keV) electron microscope. The final data set was collected on an FEI Tecnai Spirit T12 (120keV) electron microscope with a Tietz TVIPS CMOS (4K by 4K) camera controlled with Leginon automated imaging software[27]. Images were collected at 52,000× magnification with a −1.3 μm defocus for a final magnified pixel size of 2.05 Å/pix. Both Automated particle picking performed with DoG-Picker[28] and reference-free 2-D classification with iterative MRA-MSA[29] were executed through the Appion database[30]. For 3D analysis, micrographs were first CTF estimated with GCTF then particles were extracted, phase-flipped, and subjected to reference-based 3D classification and refinement in Relion version 2.0[31]. The final 3D reconstruction contained ~3.5k particles out of the initial ~13.5k that went into 3D classification. UCSF Chimera was used to generate figures[32].
Single-Cell Sorting of Cow PBMCs using Flow Cytometry
Sorting of cow PBMCs was performed as described previously with some modifications[21]. Cow PBMCs were stained with primary fluorophore-conjugated antibodies binding cow IgG (AbCam) and 50 nM of biotinylated BG505 SOSIP.664-avi gp140 coupled to streptavidin-APC and PE (Life Technologies) in equimolar ratios. Cells were stained for 1 hr at 4 °C in PBS containing 1 mM EDTA and 1% FBS. Cells were sorted for IgG+/BG505 SOSIP.664-avi-PE+/BG505 SOSIP.664-avi-APC+ events. Target cells were single-cell sorted into 96-well plates containing lysis buffer on a BD Fusion sorter and were immediately frozen on dry ice.
Single Cell PCR Amplification and Cloning of Antibody Variable Genes
cDNA synthesis from mRNA and subsequent rounds of PCR amplification of antibody variable genes were performed as previously described, but using primers for cow immunoglobulin (Supplementary Table 3). PCR reactions were set up in 25 μL volume with 2.5 μL cDNA or PCR1 product using HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen). Heavy and light chain paired retrieved form single sorted cells were cloned into human antibody expression vectors as described previously[33].
Antibody production and purification
Antibody plasmids containing heavy chain and light chain genes were co-transfected (1:1 ratio) in either HEK 293T or 293F cells using X-tremeGENE (Roche) or 293fectin (Invitrogen) as transfection reagents, respectively. Antibody containing supernatants were harvested 4 days after transfection and 0.22μm sterile filtered. Antibodies produced in 293T cells were quantified by anti-Fc ELISA and used directly in neutralization assays for screening purposes. Antibody supernatants produced in 293F cells were purified over Protein A Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (GE healthcare) columns as described previously[18].
ELISA assays
ELISA plates were first coated with an anti-C5 gp120 antibody at 4°C in 1× PBS overnight. Plates were then washed 5× with PBS + 0.05% tween and blocked with 3% BSA in 1× PBS at room temperature for 1 hr. Mutant pseudovirus supernatants were lysed with 1% NP40 and then captured on ELISA plates at 37°C for 2 hr. Plates were washed 5× with PBS + 0.05% tween and then serial dilutions of mAb were added to the wells and plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Plates were washed 5× with PBS + 0.05% tween and then goat anti-human IgG F(ab′)2 conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Pierce) was diluted 1:1000 in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.05% tween and added to the wells. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 h and washed 5× with PBS + 0.05% tween. Plates were then developed by adding 50 uL of alkaline phosphatase substrate (Sigma) dissolved in alkaline phosphatase staining buffer (pH 9.8), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density at 405 nm was read on a microplate reader (Molecular Devices). For experiments involving antibody binding to antigen at different pH, serial dilutions of mAbs were incubated in PBS at different pHs or simulated vaginal fluid[19] (SVF) for 1 hr at RT and then washed 5× with PBS + 0.05% tween before addition of goat anti-human IgG F(ab′)2 conjugated to alkaline phosphatase secondary. SVF was made with citric acid instead of lactic acid to improve buffering at higher pH levels.
Competition ELISA
For competition ELISA experiments, competing antibodies were biotinylated using an antibody biotinylation kit (Thermo Scientific). Plates were coated with an anti-His antibody (Roche) at 5 μg/mL overnight. Following washing, plates were blocked with 3% BSA for 1 h at RT. The stabilized BG505 SOSIP construct MD39[22] was then captured at 2.5 μg/mL in PBS (50 μl/well) for 2 h at 37°C. Following washing, serially diluted antibodies in PBS/1% BSA were added for 30 min. To this was added biotinylated antibody at a constant EC70 concentration for 1 h. Plates were washed and detection was measured using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin (Pierce) at 1:1000 for 1 h at RT. Absorption was measured at 405 nm.
Polyreactivity assay: HEp-2 cell staining assay
The HEp-2 cell-staining assay was performed using kits purchased from Aesku Diagnostics (Oakland, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. These Aesku slides use optimally fixed human epithelial (HEp-2) cells (ATCC) as substrate and affinity purified, FITC-conjugated goat anti-human IgG for the detection. Briefly, 2.5 μg or 25 μl of 100 μg/ml mAb and controls were added to wells and incubated on HEp-2 slides in a moist chamber at room temperature for 30 min. Slides were then rinsed and submerged in PBS and 25 μl of FITC-conjugated goat anti-human IgG was immediately applied to each well. Slides were allowed to incubate at room temperature in a moist chamber for another 30 min. Slides were then washed in the same manner as above and then mounted on coverslips using the provided mounting medium. Slides were viewed at 20× magnification and photographed on an EVOS f1 fluorescence microscope at a 250 ms exposure with 100% intensity. Positive and negative control sera were provided by the vendor. Samples showing fluorescence greater than the negative control were considered positive for HEp-2 staining.
Monoclonal antibodies were screened for reactivity with preparations of solubilized membrane proteins (SMP) and cytosolic proteins (SCP) as described previously with a small modification[20]. Briefly, SMP and SCP were extracted from CHO cells (ATCC). The protein concentration was determined using the Dc-protein assay kit (BioRad). SMP and SCP were then immobilized on ELISA plates for mAb screening. The results were established by reading the absorbance at 450 nm of the examined samples.
Polyreactivity assay: Single autoantigen reactivity
Single antigen ELISA assays for SSA/Ro, SS-B/La, Sm, ribonucleoprotein (RNP), Jo-1, double-stranded DNA, centromere B, and histones were purchased from Aesku Diagnostics (Oakland, CA). The 96 wells were separately coated with these eight cellular and nuclear antigens for the qualitative detection of mAbs reactivity. A cut-off calibrator was provided by the manufacturer. The negative control was diluted human serum.
Serum collected at different timepoints over the course of immunization for cows 26 and 27 were evaluated for neutralization breath and potency on the 12-virus global indicator panel
Values represent serum ID50 against the indicated virus and colored according to the legend.
Autologous serum timepoints tested for neutralization on BG505 pseudovirus
Neutralization against autologous virus emerged at the same time as breadth (d42) and increased in potency over time. Values represent serum ID50.
Development of neutralization breadth at 35 days post immunization from cows in experiment 1
Serum collected at day 35 from experiment 1 were tested for neutralization breadth and potency on the 12-virus global indicator panel. Values represent serum ID50.
Sorting strategy for isolating antigen-specific IgG+ B cells
(A) Cow PBMCs were sorted for IgG+ cells that bound to biotinylated BG505 SOSIP-AviTag conjugated on PE and APC fluorophores. (B) To isolate epitope-specific antibodies, unliganded BG505 SOSIP (blue) and BG505 SOSIP liganded with NC-Cow1 was used to antigen-sort memory B cells. Epitope-specific B cells are defined as binding unliganded SOSIP and not binding to liganded SOSIP. This sort strategy yielded the broadly neutralizing antibodies NC-Cow7 to NC-Cow10.
Functional screening and sequencing information for isolated antibodies
(A) Amplified heavy chains were paired with universal cow light chain or with NC-Cow1 light chain and tested for expression (anti-Fc ELISA), Ag binding (BG505 SOSIP), autologous neutralization (BG505 pseudovirus), and heterologous neutralization (Q23 pseudovirus). Sequence alignment of recovered heavy chains are listed underneath. As ultralong HCDR3 antibodies have been reported to pair with a single germline light chain (V30), amplified heavy chain genes were first paired with the universal cow light chain and screened for expression, binding to BG505 SOSIP, neutralization of BG505 virus, and neutralization of a clade A heterologous virus, Q23. From this dataset, 3 antibodies (named NC-Cow1, NC-Cow2, and NC-Cow3) were selected that showed autologous neutralization (all from d238) and corresponding native light chains were amplified, with success for only NC-Cow1. These three antibodies were expressed and purified at larger scale for additional characterization by maintaining native pairing for NC-Cow1 and pairing with germline V30 for NC-Cow2 and NC-Cow3. For the d70 timepoint, three heavy chains were selected that showed binding to BG505 SOSIP, but no neutralization, and these antibodies were produced with their native light chain pairs (NC-Cow4 to NC-Cow6). Finally, as NC-Cow1 could neutralize isolate Q23 in the neutralization screen, an additional sort with PBMCs from d381 was performed, but used BG505 SOSIP liganded with and without NC-Cow1 to enrich for epitope-specific antibodies. The enrichment yielded an additional 5 hits by neutralization screen, and 4 out of these 5 antibodies were produced at larger scale with their native light chain pairs (NC-Cow7 to NC-Cow10). Small-scale screening was also performed with all heavy chains paired with NC-Cow1 light chain and no significant increase in neutralization breadth was observed, although there were slight improvements in BG505 SOSIP affinity or autologous potency. (B) Nucleotide alignment of heavy chain sequences of isolated monoclonal antibodies[34].
NC-Cow1 is not polyreactive to human antigens
(A) NC-Cow1 was tested for antigen reactivity in a HEp2 assay compared to the known polyreactive antibody 4E10, and negative and positive control sera supplied by the manufacturer. (B) NC-Cow1 was also tested for reactivity with a range of typical human autoantigens by ELISA as well as for binding to solubilized membrane (SMP) and cytosolic preparations (SCP) from CHO cells. Values are optical density values (OD405) at a 100 μg/ml dose. Black line indicates cut-off values as indicated by the manufacturer.
Epitope mapping of NC-Cow1
(A) Representative 2D class averages of cowFabs NC-Cow1 and NC-Cow2 bound to BG505 SOSIP trimers to demonstrate CD4bs site specificity. The Fabs appear at slightly different angles relative to the trimer, perhaps due to some flexibility between the Fab and HCDR3. In the 2D class averages for NC-Cow1, the HCDR3 appears as a faint density bridging between the Fab and CD4bs. (B) Top and side views of 3D reconstruction of NC-Cow1 bound to BG505 SOSIP trimer with previously published Env trimer structure (green, PDB 5CEZ) and cowFab (orange, PDB 5IJV) docked in. The body of NC-Cow1 Fab is approximately 20 Å away from the CD4 binding site, which is the estimated length of the ultralong HCDR3. (C) NC-Cow 1 was tested for binding by ELISA to BG505 or JRCSF gp120 captured from lysed virions with PGT121 (V3-glycan epitope) and VRC01 (CD4bs epitope) included for comparison. Values are EC50 in mg/ml. NC-Cow1 was also tested on BG505 or JR-CSF pseudoviruses and corresponding alanine mutants with PGT121 (V3-glycan epitope) and 12A12 (CD4bs epitope) included for comparison. Values are IC50 in mg/ml. (D) NC-Cow1 was tested for binding to WT and D368R protein. Antibodies VRC01 (CD4bs) and 14e (V3) were included for comparison.
Effects of pH on binding of NC-Cow1 and CD4bs antibodies to gp120
(A) CD4bs antibodies PGV04, 12A12, 3BNC60, and b12 were tested for binding to gp120 (isolate 92BR020) by ELISA in buffers at different pHs (3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0). (B) NC-Cow1 and VRC01 were tested for binding to BG505 gp120 in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) compared to simulated vaginal fluid (SVF), pH 4.5.Evaluation of purified recombinant antibody for neutralization breadth and potency.Antibodies were expressed and purified and tested on the 12-virus global indicator panel as well as clade A viruses. Values are neutralization IC50 in mg/ml. The timepoint from which the antibodies were isolated are indicated at the top and antibodies paired with universal light chain are indicated with an asterisk – all other antibodies were produced using native heavy and light chain pairs.Mapping epitope specificity over time.Serum samples from cow 26 were for competition by NC-Cow1. Values present serum dilution EC50 titers for BG505 SOSIP and for BG505 V3 peptide.
Authors: Marit Kramski; Rob J Center; Adam K Wheatley; Jonathan C Jacobson; Marina R Alexander; Grant Rawlin; Damian F J Purcell Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Laura E McCoy; Anna Forsman Quigley; Nika M Strokappe; Bianca Bulmer-Thomas; Michael S Seaman; Daniella Mortier; Lucy Rutten; Nikita Chander; Carolyn J Edwards; Robin Ketteler; David Davis; Theo Verrips; Robin A Weiss Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Gabriel C Lander; Scott M Stagg; Neil R Voss; Anchi Cheng; Denis Fellmann; James Pulokas; Craig Yoshioka; Christopher Irving; Anke Mulder; Pick-Wei Lau; Dmitry Lyumkis; Clinton S Potter; Bridget Carragher Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Bin Shi; Long Ma; Xiaoyan He; Xiaomei Wang; Peng Wang; Li Zhou; Xinsheng Yao Journal: Theor Biol Med Model Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 2.432
Authors: Jon M Steichen; Daniel W Kulp; Talar Tokatlian; Amelia Escolano; Pia Dosenovic; Robyn L Stanfield; Laura E McCoy; Gabriel Ozorowski; Xiaozhen Hu; Oleksandr Kalyuzhniy; Bryan Briney; Torben Schiffner; Fernando Garces; Natalia T Freund; Alexander D Gitlin; Sergey Menis; Erik Georgeson; Michael Kubitz; Yumiko Adachi; Meaghan Jones; Andrew A Mutafyan; Dong Soo Yun; Christian T Mayer; Andrew B Ward; Dennis R Burton; Ian A Wilson; Darrell J Irvine; Michel C Nussenzweig; William R Schief Journal: Immunity Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Maya Sangesland; Larance Ronsard; Samuel W Kazer; Julia Bals; Seyhan Boyoglu-Barnum; Ashraf S Yousif; Ralston Barnes; Jared Feldman; Maricel Quirindongo-Crespo; Patrick M McTamney; Daniel Rohrer; Nils Lonberg; Bryce Chackerian; Barney S Graham; Masaru Kanekiyo; Alex K Shalek; Daniel Lingwood Journal: Immunity Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: David H Mulama; Lorraine Z Mutsvunguma; Jennifer Totonchy; Peng Ye; Joslyn Foley; Gabriela M Escalante; Esther Rodriguez; Ramina Nabiee; Murali Muniraju; Felix Wussow; Anne K Barasa; Javier Gordon Ogembo Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Robyn L Stanfield; Jeremy Haakenson; Thaddeus C Deiss; Michael F Criscitiello; Ian A Wilson; Vaughn V Smider Journal: Adv Immunol Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 3.543
Authors: Hui Cai; Rou-Shu Zhang; Jared Orwenyo; John Giddens; Qiang Yang; Celia C LaBranche; David C Montefiori; Lai-Xi Wang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.446