Literature DB >> 29805186

HIGH-DIMENSIONAL A-LEARNING FOR OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES.

Chengchun Shi1, Alin Fan1, Rui Song1, Wenbin Lu1.   

Abstract

Precision medicine is a medical paradigm that focuses on finding the most effective treatment decision based on individual patient information. For many complex diseases, such as cancer, treatment decisions need to be tailored over time according to patients' responses to previous treatments. Such an adaptive strategy is referred as a dynamic treatment regime. A major challenge in deriving an optimal dynamic treatment regime arises when an extraordinary large number of prognostic factors, such as patient's genetic information, demographic characteristics, medical history and clinical measurements over time are available, but not all of them are necessary for making treatment decision. This makes variable selection an emerging need in precision medicine. In this paper, we propose a penalized multi-stage A-learning for deriving the optimal dynamic treatment regime when the number of covariates is of the non-polynomial (NP) order of the sample size. To preserve the double robustness property of the A-learning method, we adopt the Dantzig selector which directly penalizes the A-leaning estimating equations. Oracle inequalities of the proposed estimators for the parameters in the optimal dynamic treatment regime and error bounds on the difference between the value functions of the estimated optimal dynamic treatment regime and the true optimal dynamic treatment regime are established. Empirical performance of the proposed approach is evaluated by simulations and illustrated with an application to data from the STAR*D study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-learning; Dantzig selector; Model misspecification; NP-dimensionality; Optimal dynamic treatment regime; Oracle inequality

Year:  2018        PMID: 29805186      PMCID: PMC5966293          DOI: 10.1214/17-AOS1570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stat        ISSN: 0090-5364            Impact factor:   4.028


  9 in total

1.  Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.

Authors:  J M Robins; M A Hernán; B Brumback
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

3.  A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 5.  Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Harold A Sackeim; Frederic M Quitkin; Steven Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06

6.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

8.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; A John Rush; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes for sequential treatment decisions.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  High-Dimensional Inference for Personalized Treatment Decision.

Authors:  X Jessie Jeng; Wenbin Lu; Huimin Peng
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 1.125

2.  A constrained single-index regression for estimating interactions between a treatment and covariates.

Authors:  Hyung Park; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Step-adjusted tree-based reinforcement learning for evaluating nested dynamic treatment regimes using test-and-treat observational data.

Authors:  Ming Tang; Lu Wang; Michael A Gorin; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A single-index model with multiple-links.

Authors:  Hyung Park; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  Selecting Biomarkers for building optimal treatment selection rules using Kernel Machines.

Authors:  Sayan Dasgupta; Ying Huang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.864

6.  Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).

Authors:  Palash Ghosh; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Bonnie Spring; Bibhas Chakraborty
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-09-09

7.  A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity.

Authors:  Yifan Cui; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Optimal treatment regimes for competing risk data using doubly robust outcome weighted learning with bi-level variable selection.

Authors:  Yizeng He; Soyoung Kim; Mi-Ok Kim; Wael Saber; Kwang Woo Ahn
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.035

9.  Multithreshold change plane model: Estimation theory and applications in subgroup identification.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Yaguang Li; Baisuo Jin; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.