Literature DB >> 24302771

Robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes for sequential treatment decisions.

Baqun Zhang1, Anastasios A Tsiatis, Eric B Laber, Marie Davidian.   

Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime is a list of sequential decision rules for assigning treatment based on a patient's history. Q- and A-learning are two main approaches for estimating the optimal regime, i.e., that yielding the most beneficial outcome in the patient population, using data from a clinical trial or observational study. Q-learning requires postulated regression models for the outcome, while A-learning involves models for that part of the outcome regression representing treatment contrasts and for treatment assignment. We propose an alternative to Q- and A-learning that maximizes a doubly robust augmented inverse probability weighted estimator for population mean outcome over a restricted class of regimes. Simulations demonstrate the method's performance and robustness to model misspecification, which is a key concern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-learning; Double robustness; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Q-learning

Year:  2013        PMID: 24302771      PMCID: PMC3843953          DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ast014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrika        ISSN: 0006-3444            Impact factor:   2.445


  11 in total

1.  Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.

Authors:  Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky; James M Robins
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Thomas S Richardson; David A Stephens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Regret-regression for optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Robin Henderson; Phil Ansell; Deyadeen Alshibani
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; David W Oslin; A John Rush; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Structural nested mean models for assessing time-varying effect moderation.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Thomas Ten Have; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  53 in total

1.  Optimizing delivery of a behavioral pain intervention in cancer patients using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial SMART.

Authors:  Sarah A Kelleher; Caroline S Dorfman; Jen C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Joseph Winger; Vicky Gandhi; Christine Nunez; Alyssa Van Denburg; Rebecca A Shelby; Shelby D Reed; Susan Murphy; Marie Davidian; Eric B Laber; Gretchen G Kimmick; Kelly W Westbrook; Amy P Abernethy; Tamara J Somers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  W Xiao; H H Zhang; W Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Entropy Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Binyan Jiang; Rui Song; Jialiang Li; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.261

4.  Efficient augmentation and relaxation learning for individualized treatment rules using observational data.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Eric B Laber; Yang Ning; Sumona Saha; Bruce E Sands
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.654

5.  A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Ying Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Phillip J Schulte; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Estimation of the optimal regime in treatment of prostate cancer recurrence from observational data using flexible weighting models.

Authors:  Jincheng Shen; Lu Wang; Jeremy M G Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Comment.

Authors:  Jingxiang Chen; Yufeng Liu; Donglin Zeng; Rui Song; Yingqi Zhao; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Comment.

Authors:  Qian Guan; Eric B Laber; Brian J Reich
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Longitudinal Effects of Adaptive Interventions With a Speech-Generating Device in Minimally Verbal Children With ASD.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Charlotte DiStefano; Ya-Chih Chang; Stephanie Shire; Ann Kaiser; Xi Lu; Inbal Nahum-Shani; Rebecca Landa; Pamela Mathy; Connie Kasari
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.