Literature DB >> 29800138

Estimating the Association of the 2017 and 2014 Hypertension Guidelines With Cardiovascular Events and Deaths in US Adults: An Analysis of National Data.

Joshua D Bundy1,2,3, Katherine T Mills1,2, Jing Chen2,4, Changwei Li1, Philip Greenland3, Jiang He1,2,4.   

Abstract

Importance: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline recommends lower blood pressure (BP) thresholds for initiating antihypertensive medication and treatment goals than the 2014 evidence-based hypertension guideline. Objective: To estimate the potential association of the 2017 and 2014 hypertension guidelines with the proportion of US adults defined as being hypertensive or recommended for antihypertensive treatment and with risk reduction of major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013 to 2016, we estimated the proportions of US adults with hypertension or recommended for antihypertensive treatment according to the 2017 and 2014 hypertension guidelines. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, antihypertensive clinical trials, and population-based cohort studies, we estimated risk reductions of CVD and all-cause mortality assuming the entire US adult population achieved guideline-recommended systolic BP (SBP) treatment goals. Data were analyzed between October 2017 and March 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportions and numbers of individuals with hypertension or recommended for antihypertensive treatment and numbers of CVD and all-cause mortality reduction.
Results: According to the 2017 hypertension guideline, the prevalence of hypertension (BP level ≥130/80 mm Hg) was 45.4% (95% CI, 43.9%-46.9%), representing 105.3 (95% CI, 101.9-108.8) million US adults, which was significantly higher than estimates per the 2014 hypertension guideline (BP level ≥140/90 mm Hg): 32.0% (95% CI, 30.3%-33.6%) or 74.1 (95% CI, 70.3-77.9) million individuals, respectively. Additionally, the proportion of individuals recommended for antihypertensive treatment was significantly higher according to the 2017 hypertension guideline (35.9%; 95% CI, 34.2%-37.5%) compared with the 2014 hypertension guideline (31.1%; 95% CI, 29.6%-32.7%). Achieving the 2017 hypertension guideline SBP treatment goals is estimated to reduce 610 000 (95% CI, 496 000-734 000) CVD events and 334 000 (95% CI, 245 000-434 000) total deaths in US adults 40 years and older. Corresponding estimates after achieving the 2014 hypertension guideline SBP treatment goals were 270 000 (95% CI, 202 000-349 000) and 177 000 (95% CI, 123 000-241 000), respectively. Implementing the 2017 hypertension guideline is estimated to increase 62 000 hypotension and 79 000 acute kidney injury or failure events. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with the 2014 hypertension guideline, the 2017 hypertension guideline was associated with an increase in the proportion of adults recommended for antihypertensive treatment and a further reduction in major CVD events and all-cause mortality, but a possible increase in the number of adverse events in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800138      PMCID: PMC6324252          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  32 in total

Review 1.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

2.  Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015.

Authors:  Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Patrick Liu; Gregory A Roth; Marie Ng; Stan Biryukov; Laurie Marczak; Lily Alexander; Kara Estep; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Tomi F Akinyemiju; Raghib Ali; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Peter Azzopardi; Amitava Banerjee; Till Bärnighausen; Arindam Basu; Tolesa Bekele; Derrick A Bennett; Sibhatu Biadgilign; Ferrán Catalá-López; Valery L Feigin; Joao C Fernandes; Florian Fischer; Alemseged Aregay Gebru; Philimon Gona; Rajeev Gupta; Graeme J Hankey; Jost B Jonas; Suzanne E Judd; Young-Ho Khang; Ardeshir Khosravi; Yun Jin Kim; Ruth W Kimokoti; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Dhaval Kolte; Alan Lopez; Paulo A Lotufo; Reza Malekzadeh; Yohannes Adama Melaku; George A Mensah; Awoke Misganaw; Ali H Mokdad; Andrew E Moran; Haseeb Nawaz; Bruce Neal; Frida Namnyak Ngalesoni; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Farshad Pourmalek; Anwar Rafay; Rajesh Kumar Rai; David Rojas-Rueda; Uchechukwu K Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Aletta E Schutte; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Girma Temam Shifa; Ivy Shiue; Bemnet Amare Tedla; Amanda G Thrift; Marcello Tonelli; Thomas Truelsen; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Olalekan A Uthman; Tommi Vasankari; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Theo Vos; Ronny Westerman; Lijing L Yan; Yuichiro Yano; Naohiro Yonemoto; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Deaths: Final Data for 2014.

Authors:  Kenneth D Kochanek; Sherry L Murphy; Jiaquan Xu; Betzaida Tejada-Vera
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2016-06

4.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeff D Williamson; Mark A Supiano; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Ruth C Campbell; Glenn M Chertow; Larry J Fine; William E Haley; Amret T Hawfield; Joachim H Ix; Dalane W Kitzman; John B Kostis; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Lenore J Launer; Suzanne Oparil; Carlos J Rodriguez; Christianne L Roumie; Ronald I Shorr; Kaycee M Sink; Virginia G Wadley; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Nancy F Woolard; Jackson T Wright; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial.

Authors:  O R Benavente; C S Coffey; R Conwit; R G Hart; L A McClure; L A Pearce; P E Pergola; J M Szychowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Brandon K Bellows; Jordan B King; Rachel Hess; Srinivasan Beddhu; Zugui Zhang; Dan R Berlowitz; Molly B Conroy; Larry Fine; Suzanne Oparil; Donald E Morisky; Lewis E Kazis; Natalia Ruiz-Negrón; Jamie Powell; Leonardo Tamariz; Jeff Whittle; Jackson T Wright; Mark A Supiano; Alfred K Cheung; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  33 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Yan-Feng Zhou; Na Liu; Pei Wang; Jae Jeong Yang; Xing-Yue Song; Xiong-Fei Pan; Xiaomin Zhang; Meian He; Honglan Li; Yu-Tang Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Tangchun Wu; Danxia Yu; An Pan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Bridging the Gap Between Cardiology and Family Medicine.

Authors:  Cezary Wójcik; Michael D Shapiro
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Evidence for the Universal Blood Pressure Goal of <130/80 mm Hg Is Strong: Controversies in Hypertension - Pro Side of the Argument.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Comparison of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline with Earlier Guidelines on Estimated Reductions in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Joshua D Bundy; Katherine T Mills; Jiang He
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Evolution of Blood Pressure Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Personal Perspective.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Implications of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline in a Modern Primary Prevention Multi-Ethnic Prospective Cohort (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Charles Amir German; John W McEvoy; Michael J Blaha; Alain Bertoni; Michael D Miedema; Gregory L Burke; Joseph Yeboah
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Deaths from total and premature cardiovascular disease associated with high normal blood pressure and hypertension in rural Chinese men and elderly people.

Authors:  Leilei Liu; Yu Liu; Yongcheng Ren; Yang Zhao; Pei Qin; Dechen Liu; Xu Chen; Cheng Cheng; Feiyan Liu; Chunmei Guo; Qionggui Zhou; Quanman Li; Gang Tian; Minghui Han; Ranran Qie; Xiaoyan Wu; Shengbing Huang; Xinping Luo; Ruirong Cheng; Dongsheng Hu; Jian Wang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Predicting response to lisinopril in treating hypertension: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brandon J Sonn; Jessica L Saben; Glenn McWilliams; Shelby K Shelton; Hania K Flaten; Angelo D'Alessandro; Andrew A Monte
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 9.  Impact of therapeutic lifestyle changes in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Cemal Ozemek; Stephanie Tiwari; Ahmad Sabbahi; Salvatore Carbone; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 8.194

10.  Potential Cardiovascular Disease Events Prevented with Adoption of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Lisandro D Colantonio; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; John N Booth; Michelle C Odden; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Daichi Shimbo; Paul K Whelton; Emily B Levitan; George Howard; Brandon K Bellows; Dawn Kleindorfer; Monika M Safford; Paul Muntner; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.