Literature DB >> 32713271

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Yan-Feng Zhou1, Na Liu1, Pei Wang2, Jae Jeong Yang3, Xing-Yue Song1, Xiong-Fei Pan1, Xiaomin Zhang4,5, Meian He4,5, Honglan Li6, Yu-Tang Gao6, Yong-Bing Xiang6, Tangchun Wu4,5, Danxia Yu3, An Pan1,5.   

Abstract

Systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg has been defined as stage I hypertension by the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines. Drug treatment is recommended for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines but not in the 2018 Chinese guidelines. However, the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment among this subgroup of Chinese patients is unclear. This study developed a microsimulation model to compare costs and effectiveness of drug treatment and nondrug treatment for the subgroup of stage I hypertensive patients over a lifetime horizon from a government affordability perspective. Event rates of mortality and cardiovascular complications were estimated from 3 cohorts in the Chinese population. Costs and health utilities were obtained from the national statistics report and published literature. The model predicted that drug treatment generated quality-adjusted life-years of 13.52 and associated with expected costs of $6825 in comparison with 13.81 and $7328 produced by nondrug treatment over a lifetime horizon among stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $8836/quality-adjusted life-year (the GDP per capita in 2017), drug treatment only had a 1.8% probability of being cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment after 10 000 probabilistic simulations. Sensitivity analysis of treatment costs, benefits expected from treatment, health utilities, and discount rates did not change the results. Our results suggested that drug treatment was not cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Heart Association; Asian continental ancestry group; cost-benefit analysis; quality-adjusted life-years

Year:  2020        PMID: 32713271      PMCID: PMC7429361          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  39 in total

1.  Implications of the New American College of Cardiology Guidelines for Hypertension Prevalence in India.

Authors:  Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy; Pascal Geldsetzer; Lindsay M Jaacks; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The Shanghai Women's Health Study: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Wong-Ho Chow; Gong Yang; Fan Jin; Nathaniel Rothman; Aaron Blair; Hong-Lan Li; Wanqing Wen; Bu-Tian Ji; Qi Li; Xiao-Ou Shu; Yu-Tang Gao
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Availability, cost, and prescription patterns of antihypertensive medications in primary health care in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Meng Su; Qiuli Zhang; Xueke Bai; Chaoqun Wu; Yetong Li; Elias Mossialos; George A Mensah; Frederick A Masoudi; Jiapeng Lu; Xi Li; Sebastian Salas-Vega; Anwen Zhang; Yuan Lu; Khurram Nasir; Harlan M Krumholz; Lixin Jiang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

6.  Self-Rated Health Status and Risk of Incident Stroke in 0.5 Million Chinese Adults: The China Kadoorie Biobank Study.

Authors:  Wenhong Dong; Xiong-Fei Pan; Canqing Yu; Jun Lv; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Ling Yang; Yiping Chen; Tangchun Wu; Zhengming Chen; An Pan; Liming Li
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

7.  Prevalence of Hypertension, Treatment, and Blood Pressure Targets in Canada Associated With the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines.

Authors:  Stephanie Garies; Sylvia Hao; Kerry McBrien; Tyler Williamson; Mingkai Peng; Nadia A Khan; Raj S Padwal; Hude Quan; Alexander A Leung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

8.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study.

Authors:  Dongfeng Gu; Jiang He; Pamela G Coxson; Petra W Rasmussen; Chen Huang; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Keane Y Tzong; Juyang Xiong; Miao Wang; Dong Zhao; Lee Goldman; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Association of "Elevated Blood Pressure" and "Stage 1 Hypertension" With Cardiovascular Mortality Among an Asian Population.

Authors:  Mohammad Talaei; Naeimeh Hosseini; Angela S Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Impact of 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on prevalence of hypertension and eligibility for antihypertensive treatment in United States and China: nationally representative cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Yuan Lu; Jiapeng Lu; Anshul Saxena; Khurram Nasir; Lixin Jiang; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Blood pressure categories defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline and all-cause mortality: a national cohort study in China and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Wang; Jieyu Liu; Haoyue Teng; Yushan Zhang; Xingxuan Dong; Wei Chen; Jieyun Yin
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Sacubitril-valsartan for the treatment of hypertension in China: A cost-utility analysis based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yake Lou; Ying Yu; Jinxing Liu; Jing Huang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  The blood pressure control and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular risk among Chinese community hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Shijun Liu; Hanyan Yuan; Caixia Jiang; Jue Xu; Xin Qiu; Jun Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.