Literature DB >> 31473837

Comparison of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline with Earlier Guidelines on Estimated Reductions in Cardiovascular Disease.

Joshua D Bundy1, Katherine T Mills1, Jiang He2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recommendations of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline and to compare it with previous guidelines on potential cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk reductions. RECENT
FINDINGS: Compared with previous guidelines, the 2017 hypertension guideline increased the prevalence of hypertension and the number of adults recommended for antihypertensive therapy in the US population. Based on data from recent analyses, the new guideline effectively directs antihypertensive therapy toward individuals at higher CVD risk. Two recent analyses using US national data estimated that implementation of the 2017 hypertension guideline could further reduce hundreds of thousands of CVD events and deaths compared with previous guidelines. However, the new guideline might increase the number of adverse events. The new guideline also improves the number of individuals needed to treat to prevent CVD events and deaths, suggesting implementation is cost-effective. Implementation of the 2017 hypertension guideline is projected to substantially reduce CVD events and deaths in the USA but might increase the number of adverse events. Future research is needed to implement and scale up effective, equitable, and sustainable strategies for applying the new guideline in daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Epidemiology; Hypertension guidelines; Mortality; Population

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473837      PMCID: PMC6889199          DOI: 10.1007/s11906-019-0980-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep        ISSN: 1522-6417            Impact factor:   5.369


  57 in total

Review 1.  Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  F Turnbull; B Neal; T Ninomiya; C Algert; H Arima; F Barzi; C Bulpitt; J Chalmers; R Fagard; A Gleason; S Heritier; N Li; V Perkovic; M Woodward; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-14

2.  Epidemiological Versus Trial Evidence for Hypertension Treatment: Adding a Piece to the Puzzle.

Authors:  Sandra J Taler
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.

Authors:  L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Fine; Daniel T Lackland; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Bora Toklu; Eugenia Gianos; Arthur Schwartzbard; Howard Weintraub; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, incident cardiovascular events, and death in elderly persons: the role of functional limitation in the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Carmen A Peralta; Ronit Katz; Anne B Newman; Bruce M Psaty; Michelle C Odden
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Association between pre-hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Xiaofan Guo; Xiaoyu Zhang; Liang Guo; Zhao Li; Liqiang Zheng; Shasha Yu; Hongmei Yang; Xinghu Zhou; Xingang Zhang; Zhaoqing Sun; Jue Li; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 10.  Effect of antihypertensive treatment at different blood pressure levels in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Mattias Brunström; Bo Carlberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Network Pharmacology Prediction and Pharmacological Verification Mechanism of Yeju Jiangya Decoction on Hypertension.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Mao He; Yuzhong Du; Suhong Chen; Guiyuan Lv
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.629

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.