Literature DB >> 29799619

How attention gates social interactions.

Francesca Capozzi1, Jelena Ristic1.   

Abstract

Social interactions are at the core of social life. However, humans selectively choose their exchange partners and do not engage in all available opportunities for social encounters. In this review, we argue that attentional systems play an important role in guiding the selection of social interactions. Supported by both classic and emerging literature, we identify and characterize the three core processes-perception, interpretation, and evaluation-that interact with attentional systems to modulate selective responses to social environments. Perceptual processes facilitate attentional prioritization of social cues. Interpretative processes link attention with understanding of cues' social meanings and agents' mental states. Evaluative processes determine the perceived value of the source of social information. The interplay between attention and these three routes of processing places attention in a powerful role to manage the selection of the vast amount of social information that individuals encounter on a daily basis and, in turn, gate the selection of social interactions.
© 2018 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional selection; mentalizing; social attention; social perception; socio-evaluative processes

Year:  2018        PMID: 29799619     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  10 in total

1.  Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Andrew P Bayliss; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Tracking the Leader: Gaze Behavior in Group Interactions.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Cigdem Beyan; Antonio Pierro; Atesh Koul; Vittorio Murino; Stefano Livi; Andrew P Bayliss; Jelena Ristic; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-05-28

3.  Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.

Authors:  S Gareth Edwards; Andrew P Bayliss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition.

Authors:  Pauline Chevalier; Kyveli Kompatsiari; Francesca Ciardo; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

5.  Cross-cultural asymmetries in oculomotor interference elicited by gaze distractors belonging to Asian and White faces.

Authors:  Xinyuan Zhang; Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Shimin Fu; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Tablet PC use directly affects children's perception and attention.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Dunja Kunke; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Bidirectional Social-Cognitive Mechanisms of the Social-Attention Symptoms of Autism.

Authors:  Peter Mundy; Jenifer Bullen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Direct Gaze Holds Attention, but Not in Individuals with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Lara Petri; Elisabetta Patron; Andrea Spoto; Michele Vicovaro
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-19

9.  Face Masks Do Not Alter Gaze Cueing of Attention: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Xinyuan Zhang; Giovanni Galfano; Luigi Castelli
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-11-30

10.  Wearing the face mask affects our social attention over space.

Authors:  Caterina Villani; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Elisa Scerrati; Paola Ricciardelli; Roberto Nicoletti; Luisa Lugli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.