Literature DB >> 29949018

Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle.

Francesca Capozzi1, Andrew P Bayliss2, Jelena Ristic3.   

Abstract

Research shows that humans spontaneously follow another individual's gaze. However, little remains known on how they respond when multiple gaze cues diverge across members of a social group. To address this question, we presented participants with displays depicting three (Experiment 1) or five (Experiment 2) agents showing diverging social cues. In a three-person group, one individual looking at the target (33% of the group) was sufficient to elicit gaze-facilitated target responses. With a five-person group, however, three individuals looking at the target (60% of the group) were necessary to produce the same effect. Gaze following in small groups therefore appears to be based on a quorum-like principle, whereby the critical level of social information needed for gaze following is determined by a proportion of consistent social cues scaled as a function of group size. As group size grows, greater agreement is needed to evoke joint attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gaze cuing; Joint attention; Small groups; Social influence; Socially acquired information

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29949018     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1464-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds.

Authors:  Andrew C Gallup; Joseph J Hale; David J T Sumpter; Simon Garnier; Alex Kacelnik; John R Krebs; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The burden of social proof: shared thresholds and social influence.

Authors:  Robert J MacCoun
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity.

Authors:  S L Franconeri; S V Jonathan; J M Scimeca
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09

4.  Gaze following.

Authors:  Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups.

Authors:  R I Dunbar; N D Duncan; D Nettle
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-03

7.  To follow or not? How animals in fusion-fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making.

Authors:  Jerod A Merkle; Marie Sigaud; Daniel Fortin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  How attention gates social interactions.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Perceiving crowd attention: Gaze following in human crowds with conflicting cues.

Authors:  Zhongqiang Sun; Wenjun Yu; Jifan Zhou; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects.

Authors:  Francesca Capozzi; Andrew P Bayliss; Marco R Elena; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  ERP evidence on how gaze convergence affects social attention.

Authors:  Nanbo Wang; Shan Xu; Shen Zhang; Yiqi Luo; Haiyan Geng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence.

Authors:  Emiel Cracco; Ulysses Bernardet; Robbe Sevenhant; Nette Vandenhouwe; Fran Copman; Wouter Durnez; Klaas Bombeke; Marcel Brass
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.