Literature DB >> 29795935

Observation-Oriented Modeling: Going Beyond "Is It All a Matter of Chance"?

James W Grice1, Maria Yepez1, Nicole L Wilson2, Yuichi Shoda2.   

Abstract

An alternative to null hypothesis significance testing is presented and discussed. This approach, referred to as observation-oriented modeling, is centered on model building in an effort to explicate the structures and processes believed to generate a set of observations. In terms of analysis, this novel approach complements traditional methods based on means, variances, and covariances with methods of pattern detection and analysis. Using data from a previously published study by Shoda et al., the basic tenets and methods of observation-oriented modeling are demonstrated and compared with traditional methods, particularly with regard to null hypothesis significance testing.

Keywords:  inference to best explanation; integrated model; null hypothesis significance testing; observation-oriented modeling

Year:  2016        PMID: 29795935      PMCID: PMC5965635          DOI: 10.1177/0013164416667985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  10 in total

1.  An abductive theory of scientific method.

Authors:  Brian D Haig
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-12

2.  Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Ruud Wetzels; Denny Borsboom; Han L J van der Maas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-03

3.  Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.

Authors:  Daryl J Bem
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-03

4.  NIH mulls rules for validating key results.

Authors:  Meredith Wadman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data?

Authors:  Daryl J Bem; Jessica Utts; Wesley O Johnson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-10

Review 6.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Cognitive-affective processing system analysis of intra-individual dynamics in collaborative therapeutic assessment: translating basic theory and research into clinical applications.

Authors:  Yuichi Shoda; Nicole L Wilson; Jessica Chen; Amanda K Gilmore; Ronald E Smith
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2013-04-08

8.  Toward a brighter future for psychology as an observation oriented science.

Authors:  James W Grice; Paul T Barrett; Liz A Schlimgen; Charles I Abramson
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2012-01-16

9.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

10.  From means and variances to persons and patterns.

Authors:  James W Grice
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-24
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Four Bad Habits of Modern Psychologists.

Authors:  James Grice; Paul Barrett; Lisa Cota; Crystal Felix; Zachery Taylor; Samantha Garner; Eliwid Medellin; Adam Vest
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-14

2.  Conspecific and interspecific stimuli reduce initial performance in an aversive learning task in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Christopher A Varnon; Christopher W Dinges; Adam J Vest; Charles I Abramson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.